ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the effect between Saccharomyces boulardii sachets and tetragenous viable bifidobacterium tablets in the treatment of rotaviral gastroenteritis of children .Methods A total of 191 patients (below 2 months to 8 years old) with rotaviral gastroenteritis admitted to this hospital from January 2012 to May 2014 were divided randomly into control groups (smectite ,conventional treatment ,number=62) ,tetragenous viable bifidobacterium tablets group (conventional treatment combined with tetragenous viable bifidobacterium tablets ,number= 64) ,saccharomyces boulardii group (conventional treatment combined with saccharomyces boulardii ,number=65) .Therapeutic effects were compared between 3 groups after 3 days and 5 days of treat‐ment .Results The obvious curative rate ,effective ratio and total rate in the groups of saccharomyces boulardii and tetragenous via‐ble bifidobacterium tablets were higher than those in the control group(P0 .05) .There was significant difference in 3 days and 5 days therapeutic effect among 3 groups (P<0 .05) .The duration of diarrhea in the group of Saccharomyces boulardii was lower than this in the group of tetragenous viable bifidobacterium tablets (P<0 .05) .Conclusion The therapeutic effect of Saccharomyces boulardii is similar to that of tetragenous viable bifidobacterium tablets in treatment of children with Rotaviral gastroenteritis .The duration of diarrhea in the group of Sac‐charomyces boulardii was lower than that of the group of tetragenous viable bifidobacterium tablets .