ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:To optimize the formulation of Roxatidine acetate hydrochloride(ROX)sustained-release tablets. METHODS:ROX sustained-release tablets were prepared by direct powder compression method. Central composite design-response surface methodology was used to optimize the formulation with composite index of 1,4,8 h in vitro accumulative release rate as index,using mass ratio of lactose/microcrystalline cellulose(MCC)(m/m),ethyl cellulose(EC)amount and HPMC amount as factors. Validation test was also conducted. RESULTS:The optimal formulation was as follows as ROX 75 mg,lactose 45 mg, MCC 91 mg,EC 65 mg,HPMC 124 mg,micropowder silica gel 2 mg. 1,4,8 h in vitro accumulative release rates of prepared sustained-release tablets were(30.7 ± 0.5)%,(65.8 ± 0.7)%,(89.4 ± 0.6)%,respectively. Related errors of them to predicted value were 0.6%,0.8%,1.2%,respectively. CONCLUSIONS:ROX sustained-release tablets are prepared successfully,and sustained-release effect is consisted with the expected effect.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore absorption kinetics of roxatidine acetate hydrochloric (ROX) in intestine of rats.Methods The absorption kinetics and permeability of ROX under different concentrations and different intestinal segments were investigated by double wavelength spectrophotometry via the in situ perfusing method in rats.Results There was no significant difference in Ka of ROX under different concentrations.The absorption rate in rats descended in order of duodenum,jejunum,ileum and colon [(3.87±0.12)×10-2,(2.53±0.18)×10-2,(1.43-±0.10)×10-2,(0.91±0.15)×10-2 · h-1].Conclusion The absorption of ROX in intestine complies with the passive transport mechanism and first order kinetics.ROX is well absorbed in thewhole intestine.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To synthesize roxatidine acetate and its salt. Methods: Using orthogonal test method, reactant ratio was made. Roxatidine acetate was synthesized. Excel was used to synthesize data and make statistics chart. Result: Salt of roxatidine ac?etate was synthesized in four steps with overall yield of 28?8%. Conclusion: The process is moderate and simple and the production cost is low.