ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To explore the application of the modified scalp coronal incision in the treatment of zygomatic and zygomatic arch fracture, and analyze its prognosis. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 236 cases with zygomatic and zygomatic arch fracture from 2008 to 2016 was performed. They were treated with zygomatic and zygomatic arch fracture open reduction and firm fixation by the modified scalp coronal incision and postoperative mouse rehabilitation. After 3-6 months, the infection of incision, facial paralysis, occlusal, degree of mouth opening, facial deformity and subjective satisfaction index were followed up. The prognosis and recovery were evaluated. RESULTS 1. All of the patients had no postoperative incision infection, subcutaneous hematoma, temporal region sag, bald, and permanent facial paralysis. They all got satisfied face recovery. 2. All patients with occlusal disorders and limited mouth opening obtained functional occlusal and ideal degrees of mouth opening. Satisfaction was 97％. CONCLUSION The modified coronal scalp incision in the reconstruction of 3 d structure of zygomatic and zygomatic arch, has the advantages of a clear operation field and accurateresetting, good restoration of face, concealed scar. It contributes to the protection of the facial nerve and vascular structureand reduces the incidence of surgical complications.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>This study aimed to examine the complications of supratemporalis approach with scalp coronal incision for the treatment of orbital-zygomatic fractures.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 206 patients with orbital-zygomatic fractures were treated with scalp coronal incision through the supratemporalis approach. The effects and complications of the treatment were analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The degree of fracture of the 206 patients was successfully reduced. The facial morphologies and functions were improved. No facial nerve injury was observed in all of the cases. However, the following complications were noted: fossa introcession in 1 case, forehead scalp pain or paresthesia in 11 cases, incision infection in 1 case, subcutaneous hematoma in 1 case, incision scar in 5 cases, and alopecia in 3 cases.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The supratemporalis approach prevents facial nerve injury and does not increase the frequency of other complications. Therefore, this approach can be applied as a routine and safe procedure in clinical settings. .</p>