ABSTRACT
@#Objective To explore the surgical technique and preliminary results of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (E-NSM) and immediate pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction (BR) with titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLoop Bra) via single axillary incision for breast cancer patients. Methods The clinical data of 9 consecutive female patients who underwent E-NSM and immediate pre-pectoral implant-based BR with TiLoop Bra from March to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of patients was 40.6 (22-60) years. The operation time, early complications were collected, and the patients' social and mental health, breast satisfaction and chest function before and after the operation were assessed with the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Results All the patients had unicentric tumor with a mean diameter of 2.4 (0.6-4.7) cm. The mean distance from the tumor to the nipple was 2.5 (2-4) cm. There were 2 patients with tumor stage 0 and 7 patients with stageⅠ. The mean operation time was 161.1 (125-201) min, the mean blood loss was 41.1 mL and the hospital stay time was 1.5 d. There were 5 patients in the day-care unit. All the patients were successfully followed up with a median follow-up time of 1 (1-2) month. One (11.1%) patient with depigmentation of the nipple-areola complex caused by mild ischemia. None of the patients had incision complications, subcutaneous emphysema, hematoma, infection, nipple-areola or skin flaps necrosis, implant loss. During the follow-up period, no local/regional recurrence or distant metastasis was found. Chest well-being was decreased in the first month after the surgery compared with preoperative status, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.001). There was no statistical difference in the breast satisfaction or psychosocial function scores between pre- and post-operation (P>0.05). Conclusion E-NSM and immediate pre-pectoral implant-based BR with TiLoop Bra via single axillary incision has minimal trauma, rapid postoperative recovery, short operation time, few early complications and good early cosmetic effect, and the short-term result is satisfactory.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The sequence method of determining baroreflex sensitivity (BRSSEQ) has been reported to correlate poorly with the phenylephrine method of determining BRS in individuals with attenuated BRS. Inhalation anesthetics are also known to decrease BRS. We therefore assessed the effect of varying the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and R-R interval (RRI) thresholds on BRSSEQ values and compared these results with the BRS obtained by the modified Oxford technique (BRSMODOX). METHODS: The average number of valid sequences and BRSSEQ values were derived by varying the SBP threshold from 0.5 to 2.5 mmHg and the RRI threshold from 1 to 6 ms, and the relation of BRSSEQ values to BRSMODOX values using sequential administration of nitroprusside and phenylephrine was assessed in 40 healthy individuals during sevoflurane anesthesia. RESULTS: Increasing either the SBP thresholds or RRI thresholds resulted in a decrease in the number of valid sequences. As the SBP thresholds were decreased and the RRI thresholds were increased, BRSSEQ values increased. When the SBP threshold exceeded 1 mmHg, no significant correlations were observed between BRSSEQ and BRSMODOX values. Significant correlations between the two methods were observed for an SBP threshold of 0.5 mmHg and RRI thresholds of 1, 2, 3 and 4 ms. Biases between the two methods were 2.1, 2.1, 0.4, and 0.4 ms/mmHg for 0.5 mmHg and 1, 2, 3 and 4 ms. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that adjusting the SBP threshold to 0.5 mmHg and the RRI threshold to 3 or 4 ms may improve BRSSEQ validity during sevoflurane anesthesia, when compared to BRSMODOX.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Anesthetics, Inhalation , Baroreflex , Bias , Blood Pressure , Nitroprusside , PhenylephrineABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In contrast to classic drug injection method, various types of noninvasive spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (SBRS) methods have been developed using the computer analysis of the spontaneous fluctuation of heart rate and arterial blood pressure for baroreflex evaluation. In this study, we evaluated the effects of sevoflurane anesthesia on SBRS by comparing various SBRS estimates and their correlations before and after sevoflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Radial arterial pressure and electrocardiography were recorded in 50 patients before and after sevoflurane anesthesia. We derived six SBRS indices from the methods including sequence, alpha-index, transfer function analysis and impulse response function. The sequence method measured an average of baroreflex sequences. The alpha-index used the average of the square roots of the ratios between the RRI and SBP spectral power. The transfer function index used RRI and SBP cross-spectral magnitude for this index. The impulse response function method employed an inverse Fourier transform. RESULTS: All SBRS and accompanying correlations were reduced after sevoflurane anesthesia. Low (44%) and high (4%) frequency transfer function gain and sequence SBRS (4%) failed to be computed out of some patients after sevoflurane anesthesia due to poor coherence and absence of a valid sequence. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane anesthesia caused marked depression of SBRS and weakened their correlations. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of each SBRS method for selecting an appropriate method during anesthesia.