Comparing Torque Loss in Standard Implants and Short Implants with Increased Vertical Cantilever Abutments: an In Vitro Study / Comparação da perda de torque em implantes padrão e implantes curtos com pilares cantilever verticais aumentados (in vitro)

Objectives: With regard to the prevalence of abutment screw loosening (SL) and bone height reduction, particularly in the posterior regions of the jaws, as well as the contradictory issue of applying short implants instead of surgeries, along with all preparations associated with longer implants, the present study aimed to compare the amount of torque loss in short implants with increased vertical cantilever abutments and standard ones. Material and Methods: In this experimental study, a total number of 20 implants (MegaGen Implant Co., Ltd, South Korea) with 4.5 mm diameter including 10 short implants (7 mm) and 10 standard ones (10 mm) were utilized. Using a surveyor, fixtures were perpendicularly mounted in 13×34 mm resin for short implants and 19×34 mm resin for standard ones. The abutments of the same height but different cuff heights (2.5 mm for the standard implants and 5.5 mm for the short ones) were then tightened with 30 N.cm, via a digital torque meter. To compensate the settling effect, the abutment screw was re-tightened with 30 N.cm after 10 min. Upon applying 500,000 cycles at 75 N.cm and 1 Hz along the longitudinal axis on each sample, blind reverse torque value (RTV) was measured with a digital torque meter. The data were finally analyzed using Student's t-test. Results:Both groups experienced torque loss, but there was no statistically significant difference between the case and control groups in terms of abutment SL (p = 0451). Conclusion: Short implants seem to be a good mechanical alternative in emergencies with respect to torque loss and abutment SL. (AU)

Objetivos: Considerando a prevalência de afrouxamento de parafuso dos pilares, redução da altura óssea especialmente nas regiões posteriores, a questão contraditória da aplicação de implantes curtos em vez de cirurgias e todos os preparos associados a implantes mais longos, este estudo buscou comparar implantes curtos com pilares cantilever verticais aumentados e implantes padrão na quantidade de perda de torque. Material e métodos: Neste estudo experimental, foram utilizados 20 implantes (Megagen, Coreia do Sul) com diâmetro de 4,5 mm, incluindo 10 implantes curtos (7 mm) e 10 implantes padrão (10 mm). A fixação foi realizada perpendicularmente em uma resina 13 × 34 mm para implantes curtos e uma resina 19 × 34 mm para implantes padrão, usando um topógrafo. Os pilares da mesma altura, mas com diferentes comprimentos de manguito (2,5 mm para os implantes padrão e 5,5 mm para os implantes curtos) foram apertados com 30 N, utilizando um torquímetro digital. Para compensar o efeito de sedimentação, o parafuso do pilar foi reapertado com 30 N após 10 min. Depois de aplicar 500.000 ciclos a 75 N e 1 Hz ao longo do eixo longitudinal em cada amostra, o valor de torque reverso cego foi medido com um medidor de torque digital. Os dados foram analisados pelo teste t de Student. Resultados: Todos os grupos tiveram perda de torque, mas não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos caso e controle em termos de afrouxamento do parafuso do pilar (p = 0451). Conclusão: Os implantes curtos parecem ser uma boa alternativa mecânica em emergências em termos de perda de torque e afrouxamento do parafuso do pilar. (AU)

Research progress on the crown-implant ratio and clinical complications / 口腔疾病防治

@#The crown-root ratio (C/R) theory of natural teeth has been widely recognized in the field of stomatology,and has important clinical significance in predicting and assessing the prognosis of natural teeth as well as for abutment selection during denture restoration. In the past few decades, scholars have advocated for the implantation of implants as long in length as possible to improve the success rate according to the theory of crown-root ratio of natural teeth. However, with the application of short implants, our philosophy of implantation has changed, and the relationship between the crown-implant (C/I) ratio and complications has become one of the current research hotspots. In this paper, the concept of the crown-implant ratio, the research progress of the C/I ratio, the implant survival rate and clinical complications of implant restoration were reviewed and summarized, and the following suggestions were put forward: although most studies have shown no significant correlation between the C/I ratio and implant survival or marginal bone loss, this relationship may increase the risk of mechanical complications. A C/I < 3 and a crown length < 15 mm are recommended in implant restoration; when ultra-short implants are applied, the implant system can increase the bone-to-implant contact area, and splint prostheses such as crown or bridge are recommended.

Clinical application and complications of short implants (≤6 mm) / 口腔疾病防治

@#Short implants can be used as an alternative in cases of insufficient vertical bone volume after dentition defect or absence of dentition to simplify or avoid bone augmentation procedures. Short implants (≤ 6 mm) are reported to have a mean survival rate of 96% after a period of 1-5 years in function and have been widely used in cases of dentition defects or absence of dentition. Compared with conventional implants (≥ 10 mm) combined with bone augmentation procedures, short implants have fewer surgery-related complications, less marginal bone loss, shortened treatment times and reduced costs, and are preferred by patients. Due to a lack of evidence, a high crown-implant ratio should not be an obstacle for the use of short implants. In addition, most of the current literature has not enough follow-up time, the long-term implant survival data of short implants remain unclear. To improve the clinical outcomes of short implants, attention should be paid to the implant site, bone quality, and occlusal force as well as to the presence of oral health maintenance, periodontal diseases and habits through a careful intraoral and radiographic examination. The choices of wider implant use and splint restoration are recommended, occlusal force should be paid attention during implant maintenance. Inappropriate stress on restorations should be avoided. Future studies should be focused on the long-term clinical outcomes of short implants.

Short implants in posterior maxilla in elderly patients: A case series

@#<p>Placement of dental implants in reduced bone in the posterior maxilla requires maxillary sinus floor elevation. However, in elderly patients this is to be avoided. A case series on the successful placement of multiple short implants in posterior maxilla and splinted crown restorations in elderly patients was presented. Long term follow up revealed survival of the implants. Short implant is a suitable treatment option for elderly patients</p>

Implantes de altura reduzida devem ser esplintados em região posterior de mandíbula? / Should implants with reduced height be splinted in the posterior mandible?

A reabilitação de pacientes parcialmente desdentados é um tratamento viável e com excelente prognóstico. Todavia, a disponibilidade óssea em altura é um fator crucial para o sucesso desse tratamento. O levantamento de seio maxilar, apesar da baixa qualidade óssea da maxila posterior, é considerado um procedimento bastante previsível. Entretanto, técnicas reconstrutivas em mandíbula não possuem a mesma previsibilidade, além de apresentar maior morbidade pós-operatória. Apesar da alta previsibilidade dos implantes com altura reduzida, poucos são os estudos que avaliam a real necessidade da esplintagem do mesmo em mandíbula posterior atrófica. Dessa forma, o objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar a necessidade de um implante curto ser esplintado a outro. Após análise criteriosa da literatura concluiu-se que os implantes com altura reduzida unitários apresentam igual previsibilidade em relação ao esplintado. Todavia, a heterogeneidade dos estudos e a falta de ensaios clínicos randomizados justifica a elaboração de novas pesquisas.(AU)

Rehabilitation of partially edentulous patients is a viable treatment with an excellent prognosis. However, bone height availability is a crucial factor in the treatment success. The maxillary sinus lift, despite poor bone quality of posterior maxilla, is considered a predictable procedure. However, reconstructive techniques in the mandible do not have the same predictability and present more postoperative morbidity. Despite the high predictability of short implants, there are few studies evaluating the real necessity for splinting implants in posterior atrophic mandible. Thus, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the need for a short implant to be splinted to another. After analysis of the literature, this review concluded that unitary short implants presented equal predictability compared to splinted implants. However, the heterogeneity of the studies and the lack of randomized clinical trials justify the development of new research.(AU)

A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the stress distribution of 2-short implants (2SIs) installed in a severely atrophic maxillary molar site. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different diameters of internal connection implants were modeled: narrow platform (NP), regular platform (RP), and wide platform (WP). The maxillary first molars were restored with one implant or two short implants. Three 2SI models (NP-oblique, NP-vertical, and NP-horizontal) and four single implant models (RP and WP in a centered or cantilevered position) were used. Axial and oblique loadings were applied on the occlusal surface of the crown. The von Mises stress values were measured at the bone-implant, peri-implant bone, and implant/abutment complex. RESULTS: The highest stress distribution at the bone-implant interface and the peri-implant bone was noticed in the RP group, and the lowest stress distribution was observed in the 2SI groups. Cantilevered position showed unfavorable stress distribution with axial loading. 2SI types did not affect the stress distribution in oblique loading. The number and installation positions of the implant, rather than the bone level, influenced the stress distribution of 2SIs. The implant/abutment complex of WP presented the highest stress concentration while that of 2SIs showed the lowest stress concentration. CONCLUSION: 2SIs may be useful for achieving stable stress distribution on the surrounding bone and implant-abutment complex in the atrophic posterior maxilla.

Utilização de implante curto como opção de tratamento em região de maxila com altura óssea reduzida / Use of short implant as a treatment option in maxilla with reduced bone height

Os implantes dentários têm sido uma opção segura na reabilitação bucal. Os curtos, menores que 10mm, são usados em situações clínicas com grandes reabsorções ósseas após perda dentária, ao invés de um processo de enxertia óssea. Esse trabalho consiste no relato de um caso de perda do elemento dentário 15 há mais de 17 anos, e da consequente deficiência de volume ósseo remanescente. Entre as possíveis opções de tratamento com implantes dentários, foram apresentados os enxertos ósseos e instalação de implantes de tamanho convencional e implantes curtos. Como forma mais conservadora, de menor morbidade, de menor custo e com diminuição de tempo de tratamento, os implantes curtos tornaram-se a opção de escolha da paciente. Muitos trabalhos têm relatado altos índices de sucesso dos implantes curtos, considerando a importância da qualidade óssea, diâmetro, geometria, desenho e tratamento de superfície. Essa escolha de técnica pode ser uma boa alternativa de tratamento para áreas onde o volume ósseo é reduzido. Entretanto, o sucesso desse tipo de tratamento está relacionado à execução de um planejamento criterioso.

Short implants in oral rehabilitation

Introduction and objective: The placement of short dental implants is used as an alternative treatment modality to bone grafting procedures. The aim of this study was to discuss, through a literature review, the features, indications and biomechanical aspects of short implants, as well as to report the clinical factors that influence on their indication. Literature review and conclusion: It was found that short implants osseointegration can be compromised by risk factors that must be controlled to achieve treatment success. In conclusion, the main indication of short implants is to avoid an invasive surgery at atrophic areas of maxilla and mandible. Furthermore, implant design associated with surface treatment are factors that compensate its short length.

Stress distribution pattern of the different diameter and length of short implants according to the bone quality: 3-D Finite Elements Analysis

Retrospective study of short rough surface implants