Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics ; : 75-84, 2016.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-26932

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the surface structure and shear bond strength (SBS) of different ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 288 specimens (lithium-disilicate, leucite-reinforced, and glass infiltrated zirconia) were first divided into two groups according to the resin cement used, and were later divided into four groups according to the given surface treatments: G1 (hydrofluoric acid (HF)+silane), G2 (silane alone-no heat-treatment), G3 (silane alone-then dried with 60℃ heat-treatment), and G4 (silane alone-then dried with 100℃ heat-treatment). Two different adhesive luting systems were applied onto the ceramic discs in all groups. SBS (in MPa) was calculated from the failure load per bonded area (in N/mm2). Subsequently, one specimen from each group was prepared for SEM evaluation of the separated-resin–ceramic interface. RESULTS: SBS values of G1 were significantly higher than those of the other groups in the lithium disilicate ceramic and leucite reinforced ceramic, and the SBS values of G4 and G1 were significantly higher than those of G2 and G3 in glass infiltrated zirconia. The three-way ANOVA revealed that the SBS values were significantly affected by the type of resin cement (P<.001). FIN ceramics had the highest rate of cohesive failure on the ceramic surfaces than other ceramic groups. AFM images showed that the surface treatment groups exhibited similar topographies, except the group treated with HF. CONCLUSION: The heat treatment was not sufficient to achieve high SBS values as compared with HF acid etching. The surface topography of ceramics was affected by surface treatments.


Subject(s)
Adhesives , Ceramics , Glass , Hot Temperature , Lithium , Resin Cements
2.
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics ; : 30-36, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-141477

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this in-vitro investigation was to describe the effect of reinforcement with different fibers on impact strength of heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base resin and to analyze the effect of surface treatment of the fibers on the impact strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The specimens were fabricated from the dies formed as per standard ASTM D4812. 2% by weight of glass, polyethylene and polypropylene fibers were incorporated in the PMMA resin. The Izod impact testing was performed on the unnotched specimens and the values obtained were analyzed using appropriate one way ANOVA, followed by unpaired t-test. Fractured ends of the samples were subjected to the SEM analysis. RESULTS: The polypropylene fibers with plasma treatment showed the highest impact strength (9.229 x 10(2) J/m) followed by the plasma treated polyethylene fibers (9.096 x 10(2) J/m), untreated polypropylene fibers (8.697 x 10(2) J/m), untreated polyethylene fibers (7.580 x 10(2) J/m), silane treated glass fibers (6.448 x 10(2) J/m) and untreated glass fibers (5.764 x 10(2) J/m). Also the surface treatment of all the fibers has shown the significant improvement in impact strength. Findings of the SEM analysis justified the improvement in impact strength after surface treatment. CONCLUSION: Reinforcement with the fiber is an effective method to increase the impact strength of PMMA denture base resin. The surface treatment of fibers further increases the impact strength significantly.


Subject(s)
Denture Bases , Dentures , Glass , Hot Temperature , Plasma , Polyethylene , Polymers , Polymethyl Methacrylate , Polypropylenes , Reinforcement, Psychology
3.
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics ; : 30-36, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-141476

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this in-vitro investigation was to describe the effect of reinforcement with different fibers on impact strength of heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base resin and to analyze the effect of surface treatment of the fibers on the impact strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The specimens were fabricated from the dies formed as per standard ASTM D4812. 2% by weight of glass, polyethylene and polypropylene fibers were incorporated in the PMMA resin. The Izod impact testing was performed on the unnotched specimens and the values obtained were analyzed using appropriate one way ANOVA, followed by unpaired t-test. Fractured ends of the samples were subjected to the SEM analysis. RESULTS: The polypropylene fibers with plasma treatment showed the highest impact strength (9.229 x 10(2) J/m) followed by the plasma treated polyethylene fibers (9.096 x 10(2) J/m), untreated polypropylene fibers (8.697 x 10(2) J/m), untreated polyethylene fibers (7.580 x 10(2) J/m), silane treated glass fibers (6.448 x 10(2) J/m) and untreated glass fibers (5.764 x 10(2) J/m). Also the surface treatment of all the fibers has shown the significant improvement in impact strength. Findings of the SEM analysis justified the improvement in impact strength after surface treatment. CONCLUSION: Reinforcement with the fiber is an effective method to increase the impact strength of PMMA denture base resin. The surface treatment of fibers further increases the impact strength significantly.


Subject(s)
Denture Bases , Dentures , Glass , Hot Temperature , Plasma , Polyethylene , Polymers , Polymethyl Methacrylate , Polypropylenes , Reinforcement, Psychology
4.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-139855

ABSTRACT

Aim: To assess the influence of silane evaporation procedures on bond strength between a dental ceramic and a chemically activated resin cement. Materials and Methods: Eighteen blocks (6 mm Χ 14 mm Χ 14 mm) of ceramic IPS Empress 2 were cemented (C and B) to composite resin (InTen-S) blocks using a chemical adhesive system (Lok). Six groups were analyzed, each with three blocks divided according to ceramic surface treatment: two control groups (no treatment, NT; 10% hydrofluoric acid plus silane Monobond-S dried at room temperature, HFS); the other four groups comprised different evaporation patterns (silane rinsed and dried at room temperature, SRT; silane rinsed in boiling water and dried as before, SBRT; silane rinsed with boiling water and heat dried at 50°C, SBH; silane dried at 50 ± 5°C, rinsed in boiling water and dried at room temperature, SHBRT). The cemented blocks were sectioned to obtain specimens for microtensile test 7 days after cementation and were stored in water for 30 days prior to testing. Fracture patterns were analyzed by optical and scanning electron microscopy. Statistics and Results: All blocks of NT debonded during sectioning. One way ANOVA tests showed higher bond strengths for HFS than for the other groups. SBRT and SBH were statistically similar, with higher bond strengths than SRT and SHBRT. Failures were 100% adhesive in SRT and SHBRT. Cohesive failures within the "adhesive zone" were detected in HFS (30%), SBRT (24%) and SBH (40%). Conclusion: Silane treatment enhanced bond strength in all conditions evaluated, showing best results with HF etching.


Subject(s)
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate , Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Etching/methods , Dental Porcelain , Dental Stress Analysis , Hydrofluoric Acid , Lithium Compounds , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Resin Cements , Self-Curing of Dental Resins , Silanes/chemistry , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength , Volatilization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL