ABSTRACT
Due to damage to the hemi-advanced central nervous system of stroke hemiplegic patients, their ability of sit-to-stand transfer is impaired, and they are prone to fall during the sit-to-stand transfer. This article describes the characteristics of sit-to-stand transfer for hemiplegic patients at different foot placement from a biomechanical perspective, discusses the correlation between different features, analyzes the reasons for their fall, and describes the application of sit-to-stand transfer training in postoperative rehabilitation of hemiplegic patients， so as to provide references for postoperative rehabilitation of hemiplegic patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To study the human body's sit to stand transfer trajectory and kinematics based on knee joint support to provide a basis for designing the transfer aid with knee joint support. Methods:From April to June, 2019, 20 healthy volunteers were recruited and divided into three groups according to height and gender. Under the premise of knee support, the sit to stand transfer experiments with 20 cm and 30 cm between feet were conducted respectively. All subjects were repeated twice for each experiment with an interval of one minute. High-definition camera was used to record the motion trajectories of each subject's shoulder (armpit) and knee joint during the experiment, and the kinematics rules of subjects with different heights and masses were analyzed. Results:The body forward leaning displacement was less with 20 cm between feet than with 30 cm for subjects less than 172 cm tall; and was less with 30 cm than with 20 cm for subjects more than 173 cm tall. The forward flexion displacement of trunk was less with 20 cm between feet than with 30 cm for subjects with body mass index (BMI) < 23.9 kg/m2; and was less with 30 cm than with 20 cm for subjects with BMI > 23.9 kg/m2. The average time during sit to stand transfer was (1.7±0.05) s. Conclusion:In the process of sit to stand transfer, distance between feet may affect the way of joint extension, the body forward leaning distance and the forward flexion displacement of trunk. With the increase of height and mass, appropriate increase of distance between feet can reduce the difficulty of sit to stand transfer. With the increase of BMI, the time of sit to stand transfer also increases. The time spent on sit to stand transfer is more in female than in male.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed to evaluate a sit-to-stand (STS) pattern in the children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy in comparison with the normal children. METHOD: Fifteen young children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy and 21 normally developed children were recruited as subjects. A motion analysis system using a Motion analyzer (Vicon 370 M.A. with 6 infrared cameras) was used to examine the STS task. The changes in joint angle, moment, and power of each joints in lower limbs, total duration of STS transfer and each transitional points were assessed. RESULTS: Total duration of STS in patients was 2.44 sec, which was significantly prolonged in comparing with 1.10 sec in normal control. The major prolongation of STS occurred in the phase of vertical movement of center of mass (CoM). Cerebral palsied children showed more anterior pelvic tilting and hip flexion throughout STS transfer than normal control. Asymmetries in initial angle of ankle and maximal momentum of knee extension were shown in spastic diplegic children with cerebral palsy, but not in normal control. Less extension momentum and power of knee joint and more plantar flexion momentaum of ankle joint were observed in cerebral palsy in comparing with those of normal children. CONCLUSION: This study showed that STS pattern in spastic diplegic cerebral palsy was quite different from that of normal children. The characteristics of STS pattern in these children was slowness of speed; mainly from slowness of vertical displacement of CoM, and more anterior pelvic tilt, hip flexion and earlier abrupt change of knee extension. As well, the major moments required for this task in these patients occurred at hip and ankle joints instead of knee joint.
Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Ankle , Ankle Joint , Cerebral Palsy , Hip , Joints , Knee , Knee Joint , Lower Extremity , Muscle SpasticityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Rising from a sitting position is a very common, yet essential activity in daily life. The activity to perform the sit-to-stand (STS) transfer is a prerequisite for upright mobility. This study aims to provide fundamental data concerning the execution of the STS, and in particularly the followings: 1) how do the angles of the lower limbs change throughout the process of rising from a chair; 2) how much motion torque and power in each joint are required per kilogram of body weight to complete the STS transfer? METHOD: Twenty-one children who have developed normally and could understand the command requested are involved as subjects. Their age ranged from 3 to 5 years old. Motion analysis of STS transfer were assessed with the Vicon 370 M.A (Oxford Metrics Limited, United Kingdom). The changes in joint angle, maximal moment and power in lower limb were calculated throughout the STS transfer. RESULTS: A series of transition points was observed in the angles of the hip, knee and ankle joints throughout the sit-to-stand movements, which was classified into five stages. The first stage is trunk and hip flexion phase; second stage, buttock take-off; third stage, ankle dorsiflexion and knee extension; forth stage, just-standing; fifth stage, stabilizing phase. The extension moment of each joint is 0.65 Nm/kg on right, 0.71 Nm/kg on left in hip, 0.41 Nm/kg on right, 0.38 Nm/kg on left in knee and 0.21 Nm/kg on right, 0.22 Nm/kg on left in ankle joint. The extension power is 0.60 watt/kg on right, 0.68 watt/kg on left in hip, 0.59 watt/kg on right, 0.50 watt/kg on left in knee and 0.15 watt/kg on right, 0.15 watt/kg on left in ankle joint. CONCLUSION: A consistent pattern was observed throughout the sit-to-stand transfer and six transition points were observed in the angles of the hip, knee and ankle joints throughout the STS transfer. By these 6 points, the movement of the STS transfer was classified into 5 stages. Major changes in angle, moment, and power of each joint were observed in sagittal plane. There were no side to side difference during the STS transfer.