ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Introduction: The smile arc is an esthetic parameter that has been better investigated by Orthodontics after the "new esthetic paradigm". Its diagnostic evaluation and inclusion in the objectives of orthodontic planning has become fundamental for professionals seeking for more beautiful and youthful natural esthetic outcomes. Objectives: To review concepts related to the smile arc, analyze the determinants of its appearance, understanding how the possible variations can affect the esthetic perception of smile.
RESUMO Introdução: O arco do sorriso é um parâmetro estético que passou a ser mais bem estudado pela Ortodontia a partir do "novo paradigma estético". A sua avaliação diagnóstica e inclusão nos objetivos dos planejamentos ortodônticos tornou-se fundamental para profissionais que buscam resultados estéticos mais belos e joviais. Objetivos: Revisar conceitos relacionados com o arco do sorriso, analisar as determinantes da sua aparência, e compreender como suas possíveis variações podem repercutir na percepção estética do sorriso.
Subject(s)
Orthodontics , Esthetics, Dental , Smiling , BeautyABSTRACT
Todos sabemos que um sorriso harmonioso é a busca daqueles que necessitam de alguma reconstrução oclusal e isso é conseguido quando as bordas incisivas dos dentes superiores acompanham a curvatura do lábio inferior durante o sorriso e a isso chamamos de Smile Arc, ou curva do sorriso. Para que isso seja obtido, a colagem dos braquetes deve sofrer algumas mudanças no posicionamento, pois durante muitos anos seguimos a colagem preconizada pelo Prof. Andrews, colando os braquetes no meio da coroa clínica e ao final invariavelmente tínhamos um sorriso reto e não com a curva do sorriso. A modificação sugerida é uma colagem progressiva a partir do último dente, seguindo anatomicamente os pontos de contato até os caninos. A partir deste, aumentamos 0,5mm para o centro e 0,25mm para o lateral, criando assim a curva do sorriso.
Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Orthodontic Brackets , SmilingABSTRACT
Aims: To assess the influence of profession, treatment experience, age and gender on the perception of smile aesthetics with different buccal corridors and smile arcs, and to identify the threshold where buccal corridor space becomes aesthetically displeasing. Study Design: A questionnaire-based descriptive study on the assessment of attractiveness ratings by laypeople. Place and Duration of Study: Amman/Jordan, University of Jordan Hospital; Faculty of Dentistry, Division of Orthodontics, from 2010-2011. Methodology: A coloured photograph of a female smile was digitally modified to produce six smile images with buccal corridor spaces (BCSs) ranging from 0% to 25% and three smile images with altered smile arcs (consonant, flat and reverse). These images were shown to 104 laypeople who were asked to rate the attractiveness of each smile on a scale of one to ten. Analysis of variance was used to study the effect of age, gender, profession and treatment experience on smile attractiveness rating. A one-way ANOVA post hoc Duncan test was used to establish the threshold where BCS was considered unattractive. Results: The most attractive smile was the broadest and consonant smile (7.42 +/- 1.87). The image with a reverse smile arc was rated as the least attractive (2.65 +/- 1.85). Duncan’s test revealed that the threshold at which BCS was considered significantly unattractive was when it reached 25%. Analysis of variance showed that young adults perceived the broadest smile as significantly more attractive than older adults (P = .03). Profession had a significant influence on smile attractiveness ratings while gender and treatment experience did not. Conclusion: Flattening the smile arc was found to have more of an unattractive bearing than small variations in BCS. Thus, it is advisable to take into consideration the smile arc during any treatment that involves the anterior maxillary area, especially prosthodontic and restorative treatments, orthognathic surgery and orthodontics.