ABSTRACT
【Objective】 To compare the clinical effect of single channel-spinal endoscopy （Delta） and unliateral biportal endoscopic technique （UBE） for the treatment of senile lumbar spinal stenosis. 【Methods】 We retrospectively analyzed 48 elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated between February and October 2020. The patients were divided into single channel-spinal endoscopy （Delta） group （n=25） and UBE group （n=23） according to different surgical methods. We compared the operation time， intraoperative blood loss， length of hospital stay， and surgical complications between the two groups. The visual analogue score （VAS） and Oswestry disability index （ODI） were compared between the groups. 【Results】 Single channel-spinal endoscopy （Delta） group was significantly inferior to UBE group in operation time （P0.05）. The VAS scores at 24， 48， and 72 postoperative hours did not differ between the two groups （P>0.05）. The ODI scores at 3 postoperative months and final follow-up were significantly improved over the preoperative score in both groups （P0.05）. The incidence rate of complications was 8% （2/25） in single channel-spinal endoscopy （Delta） group and 9% （2/23） in UBE group， and no significant difference was found （P>0.05）. 【Conclusion】 Single channel-spinal endoscopy （Delta） and UBE technique both achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy in the treatment of senile lumbar spinal stenosis. but the former one exhibits advantages over the latter in easier performance and lower learning curve. Single channel-spinal endoscopy （Delta） is an efficacious minimally invasive surgical technique for treating senile lumbar spinal stenosis.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic posterior cervical Key-Hole fenestration decompression and nucleus pulposus extirpation in the treatment of paracentral cervical disc herniation. Methods: Between December 2015 and October 2018, 29 cases of paracentral cervical disc herniation were treated with percutaneous endoscopic posterior cervical Key-Hole fenestration decompression and nucleus pulposus extirpation. There were 16 males and 13 females, with an average age of 49.7 years (range, 39-78 years). The disease duration was 3.5-15.0 months (mean, 6.2 months). The herniated disc located at C 3, 4 in 2 cases, C 4, 5 in 5 cases, C 5, 6 in 9 cases, C 6, 7 in 12 cases, and C 7, T 1 in 1 case. The main symptoms were radiculopathy symptom. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and complications were observed and recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, cervical range of motion (ROM), Macnab standard, and cervical segment stability were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the operation. Results: All patients were followed up 11-43 months, with an average of 19.4 months. The operation time was 67-89 minutes (mean, 73.3 minutes); the intraoperative blood loss was 18-30 mL (mean, 22.9 mL); the hospital stay was 5-10 days (mean, 7.3 days). All the incisions healed by first intention. There was 1 case of hypodynia and hyperalgesia in the affected limb after operation,1 case of decreased limb muscle strength. The VAS scores and JOA scores at each time point after operation were superior to those before operation ( P0.05). At last follow-up, the effectiveness was rated according to the Macnab standard as excellent in 11 cases, good in 15 cases, fair in 2 cases, and bad in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 89.7%. The CT and MRI showed the decompression of spinal canal and nerve canal. There was no significant difference in cervical ROM between pre- and post-operation ( t=1.427, P=0.165), and no surgical segment instability occurred by X-ray films of flexion and extension of cervical vertebrae. Conclusion: For the paracentral cervical disc herniation with simultaneous compression of nerve roots and spinal cord, percutaneous endoscopic posterior cervical Key-Hole fenestration decompression and nucleus pulposus extirpation has the advantages of small trauma, quick recovery, and satisfactory effectiveness, and can be used as a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To design the surgical strategy of percutaneous full-endoscopic bilateral decompression via unilateral posterior approach for bilateral lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and to evaluate the effectiveness. Methods: The percutaneous full-endoscopic bilateral decompression via unilateral posterior approach for bilateral LSS was designed according to the pathological features of LSS. The technique was used to treat 42 patients with LSS between January 2016 and January 2018. There were 18 males and 24 females with an average age of 61.7 years (range, 46-81 years). The duration of symptoms was 1-20 years, with an average of 9.7 years. The surgical segment at L 4, 5 were 27 cases, at L 5, S 1 were 15 cases. The operation time and perioperative complications were recorded. Lumbar X-ray, CT, and MRI examinations were performed at 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year after operation. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the low back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate the lumbar function, and single continuous walking distance (SCWD) was used to evaluate lower extremity nerve function. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by MacNab criteria at 1 year after operation. Results: All patients underwent surgery successfully. The operation time was 68-141 minutes with an average of 98.2 minutes. All 42 patients were followed up 12-24 months with an average of 18.8 months. There were 2 cases of dural tears during operation, and 1 case of transient dysfunction of the lower limbs of the decompression channel after operation. All of them were cured after corresponding treatment. No serious complications such as death, major bleeding, or irreversible nerve injury occurred during follow-up. No segmental instability was found according to postoperative lumbar hyperextension and flexion X-ray films, and postoperative CT and MRI imaging showed that the stenotic lumbar spinal canal was significantly enlarged, and the compression of the nerve root was sufficient. The VAS score of low back pain and leg pain, ODI score, and SCWD at each time point after operation were significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05); the indexes were significantly improved over time after operation, and the differences were significantly ( P<0.05). The clinical efficacy was evaluated by MacNab standard at 1 year after operation, and the results were excellent in 18 cases, good in 20 cases, fair in 3 cases, and poor in 1 case. The excellent and good rate was 90.5%. Conclusion: The percutaneous full-endoscopic bilateral decompression via unilateral posterior approach for LSS is a safe and effective procedure. A well-designed surgical strategy and mastery of its technical points are important guarantees for successful operation and satisfactory results.