ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of surgical procedure for tibia-fibula fracture using a combination of internal fixation and vacuum sealing drainage(VSD).Methods Totally 108 patients were enrolled in this study and these patients were from January 2012 to December 2015 divided into two groups(54 per group) according to the surgical method.Patients in the observation group were treated with locking plates or intramedullary naiis fixation combined with VSD covered the wound for the following 6 to 10 days,and then the transplantation was performed.Patients in control group received external fixation with kirschner wire and screw fixation.When granulation tissue filled the wound,flap transplantation was performed to repair tissue defect and cover the exposed bone.The average hospital stay,operation time,local infection rate,fracture healing time were recorded and analyzed.Results In the observation group,the average hospital stay was (24.8 ± 4.2) d,wound closure time was (9.4 ± 1.7) d,rate of local infection was 5.6％,rate of bone nonunion was 7.4％,rate of osteomyelitis was 1.9％,fracture healing time was (17 ±4.7)weeks;the corresponding data in the control group was (32.2 ±8.7)d,(14.1 ±3.8)d,22.2％,9.3％,0 and (16 ± 6.5) weeks.The average hospital stay,wound closure time and infection rate of the two groups were of significant difference(P ＜0.05).There was no significant difference in terms of bone nonunion rate,osteomyelitis rate and union time (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Tibia-fibula fracture patients can be effectively treated with a combination of internal fixation and vacuum sealing drainage (VSD).This treatment may shorten the length of hospital stay,reduce the wound-close time and lower the infection rate.
ABSTRACT
[Objective]To evaluate and compare the effects of fibial-tibial fracture(FTF) treated by interlocking intramedullary nail (I I N group A) and intramedullary expand expanded self-lock nail (IESN group B).[Method]From June 2000 to September 2003,one hundred sixteen cases of FTF were treated by I I N(N=60)or IESN (N=56) and followed-up for 12~24 months (average 17.9 months).Results were compared between group A and group B.[Result]In group A,the satisfactory rate,union rate,close reduction rate,medullary expanding rate,complication rate and antirotation ability were 89.5%, 96.7%, 71.6%, 51.6%,21.6% and +++ respectively.In group B,that were correspondently 91.0%,98.5%,89.3%,5.3%,3% and +.[Conclusion]Adopting the biological osteosynthesis either the I I N or IESN for treatment of FTF could get a result of more satisfactory rate and higer union rate.Applying a stable fixation,the IESN is more suitable for instable FTF.Such as multisegmental or comminuted targe oblique FTF,while of fering a flexible fixation,IESN is preferable for transverse fractures of middle and lower third tibia and fibula.