Comparative Effectivenesses of Pulsed Radiofrequency and Transforaminal Steroid Injection for Radicular Pain due to Disc Herniation: a Prospective Randomized Trial

Transforaminal Epidural steroid injections (TFESI) have been widely adopted to alleviate and control radicular pain in accord with current guidelines. However, sometimes repeated steroid injections have adverse effects, and thus, this prospective randomized trial was undertaken to compare the effectivenesses of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) administered to a targeted dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and TFESI for the treatment of radicular pain due to disc herniation. Subjects were recruited when first proved unsuccessful (defined as a score of > 4 on a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-10 mm) and of > 30% according to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or the Neck Disability Index (NDI)). Forty-four patients that met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. The 38 subjects were randomly assigned to receive either PRF (PRF group; n = 19) or additional TFESI (TFESI group; n = 19) and were then followed for 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. To evaluate pain intensity were assessed by VAS. ODI and NDI were applied to evaluate functional disability. Mean VAS scores for cervical and lumbar radicular pain were significantly lower 12 weeks after treatment in both study groups. NDI and ODI scores also declined after treatment. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the PRF and TFESI groups in terms of VAS, ODI, or NDI scores at any time during follow-up. PRF administered to a DRG might be as effective as TFESI in terms of attenuating radicular pain caused by disc herniation, and its use would avoid the adverse effects of steroid.

Comparative Effectivenesses of Pulsed Radiofrequency and Transforaminal Steroid Injection for Radicular Pain due to Disc Herniation: a Prospective Randomized Trial

Transforaminal Epidural steroid injections (TFESI) have been widely adopted to alleviate and control radicular pain in accord with current guidelines. However, sometimes repeated steroid injections have adverse effects, and thus, this prospective randomized trial was undertaken to compare the effectivenesses of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) administered to a targeted dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and TFESI for the treatment of radicular pain due to disc herniation. Subjects were recruited when first proved unsuccessful (defined as a score of > 4 on a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-10 mm) and of > 30% according to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or the Neck Disability Index (NDI)). Forty-four patients that met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. The 38 subjects were randomly assigned to receive either PRF (PRF group; n = 19) or additional TFESI (TFESI group; n = 19) and were then followed for 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. To evaluate pain intensity were assessed by VAS. ODI and NDI were applied to evaluate functional disability. Mean VAS scores for cervical and lumbar radicular pain were significantly lower 12 weeks after treatment in both study groups. NDI and ODI scores also declined after treatment. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the PRF and TFESI groups in terms of VAS, ODI, or NDI scores at any time during follow-up. PRF administered to a DRG might be as effective as TFESI in terms of attenuating radicular pain caused by disc herniation, and its use would avoid the adverse effects of steroid.

Comparison of incidence of intravascular injections during transforaminal epidural steroid injection using different needle types / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Infrequent but serious complications of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) occur due to inadvertent intravascular injections. A few studies reported that the different needle types can influence on the occurrences of intravascular incidence in TFESI. This study prospectively evaluated whether short-bevel needle can reduce the incidences of intravascular injection of TFESI compared to long-bevel needles. METHODS: From March 2013 to December 2013, 239 consecutive patients were enrolled and received 249 fluoroscopically guided TFESI using the classic technique. Confirmation of intravascular spread was done initially with real time fluoroscopy and then with digital subtraction angiography method in a same patient. Injection technique for TFESI was the same for both short-bevel and long-bevel needle types. RESULTS: The incidences of intravascular injections with the long-bevel and short-bevel needles were 15.0% (21/140) and 9.2% (4/140), respectively. More than half of intravascular injections occurred simultaneously with epidural injections (8.0%, 20/249). There were no statistically significant differences between the long-bevel and the short-bevel needles in the rates of intravascular injections (P = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Short-bevel needles did not demonstrate any benefits in reducing the incidence of intravascular injection.

Efficacy of Epidural Neuroplasty Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Radiating Pain Caused by a Herniated Lumbar Disc

OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment effects of epidural neuroplasty (NP) and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) for the radiating pain caused by herniated lumbar disc. METHODS: Thirty-two patients diagnosed with herniated lumbar disc through magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography were included in this study. Fourteen patients received an epidural NP and eighteen patients had a TFESI. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and functional rating index (FRI) were measured before the treatment, and at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after the treatment. RESULTS: In the epidural NP group, the mean values of the VAS before the treatment, and at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after the treatment were 7.00+/-1.52, 4.29+/-1.20, 2.64+/-0.93, 1.43+/-0.51 and those of FRI were 23.57+/-3.84, 16.50+/-3.48, 11.43+/-2.44, 7.00+/-2.15. In the TFESI group, the mean values of the VAS before the treatment, and at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after the treatment were 7.22+/-2.05, 4.28+/-1.67, 2.56+/-1.04, 1.33+/-0.49 and those of FRI were 22.00+/-6.64, 16.22+/-5.07, 11.56+/-4.18, 8.06+/-1.89. During the follow-up period, the values of VAS and FRI within each group were significantly reduced (p<0.05) after the treatment. But there were no significant differences between the two groups statistically. CONCLUSION: Epidural NP and TFESI are equally effective treatments for the reduction of radiating pain and for improvement of function in patients with a herniated lumbar disc. We recommend that TFESI should be primarily applied to patients who need interventional spine treatment, because it is easier and more cost-effective than epidural NP.

Effect of Intensive Conservative Treatment on Extraforaminal Lumbar Disc Herniations - 1 Year Prospective Follow-up Study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of intensive conservative treatment on extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations. METHOD: Twenty five patients with extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations with symptomatic radicular pain were included. Under fluoroscopic guidance, 40 mg of triamcinolone was infused around the nerve root after provocation of patient's usual radicular pain. Lumbosacral dynamic stabilization exercise, thermal and electrical therapy, and education of posture correction were added. The clinical outcomes were measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) before treatment, one, three, six, and twelve months after the treatment. After twelve months, patients' satisfaction was classified to four categories: excellent, good, fair, or poor. Four patients were dropped out. RESULTS: Follow-up VAS and ODI significantly decreased since post-treatment one month (p<0.0001). The average score of VAS for lower extremity and back pain reduced significantly from 6.6, 4.5 at pretreatment to 1.5, 1.9 at 12 months post-treatment, respectively (p<0.0001). The averages of ODI reduced significantly from 65.4% at pretreatment to 25.4% at post-treatment 12 months (p<0.0001). In patients' satisfaction, seventeen patients (81.0%) were recorded as excellent or good after post-treatment 12 months. CONCLUSION: Intensive conservative treatment was effective on patients who underwent extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation. Pain relief and functional improvement sustained for 12 months.

The Effects of Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block in the Patients with Spinal Stenosis and the Skin Temperature Changes according to the Contrast Spread Patterns

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that if a fluoroscopic image of the lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (LSGB) showed the spread patterns of contrast at both the L2/3 and L4/5 disc areas, then this would demonstrate a more profound blockade effect because the spread patterns are close to sympathetic ganglia. In addition, we compared the effects of LSGB and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) for the patients suffering with spinal stenosis. METHODS: Eighty patients were divided into two groups (Group S: the patients treated with TFESI, Group L: the patients treated with LSGB). The patients of group L were classified into three groups (groups A, B and, C) according to their contrast spread pattern. The preblock and postblock temperature difference between the ipsilateral and contralateral great toe (DT(pre), DT(post), degrees C), and the DTnet were calculated as follows. DT(net) = DT(post) - DT(pre). RESULTS: Both group showed a significant reduction of the visual analogue score (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) score. Only the patients of group L showed a significant increase of their walking distance (WD). Group A showed the most significant changes in the DT(post) (6.1 +/- 1.2degrees C, P = 0.021), and the DTnet (6.0 +/- 1.0degrees C, p = 0.023), as compared to group C. CONCLUSIONS: LSGB showed a similar effect on the VAS, and ODI, and a significant effect, on WD, compared with TFESI. Group A showed a significant sympatholytic effect, as compared to group C.