Prolonged Doppler US-guided pneumatic compression of a radial artery pseudoaneurysm after percutaneous coronary intervention: a simple and effective solution for a rare and challenging problem / Compressão pneumática prolongada e guiada por ultrassom de um pseudoaneurisma da artéria radial após intervenção coronariana percutânea: solução simples e eficaz para um problema raro e desafiador

Abstract Transradial access is associated with fewer access site-related complications, earlier patient mobilization, and greater postprocedural comfort. Pseudoaneurysms are an extremely rare complication after transradial procedures and the radial artery itself is the most atypical arterial site of occurrence. We report a case in which a non-surgical, non-invasive, simple, and effective solution (prolonged pneumatic compression) was used to manage a radial artery pseudoaneurysm, a very rare and challenging complication of transradial procedures.

Resumo O acesso arterial transradial está associado a menos complicações relacionadas ao sítio de punção, com deambulação precoce do paciente e maior conforto pós-procedimento. O pseudoaneurisma é uma complicação extremamente rara após procedimentos transradiais, sendo a artéria radial, por si só, o sítio mais incomum para tal ocorrência. Relata-se um caso de um pseudoaneurisma de artéria radial, uma complicação rara e desafiadora, resolvido com êxito e de maneira simples, não invasiva e não cirúrgica (compressão pneumática prolongada).

Could radiation exposure be the Achilles’ heel of distal transradial artery access?

Distal transradial access for vascular interventions has gained ground recently. While the novel approach is associated with reduced radial artery occlusion and faster hemostasis, it could be related with prolonged procedural time, higher crossover rate and increased radiation, comparing to conventional transradial approach. Whether the radiation is increased in the procedures performed by the novel approach remains unambiguous. In the specific article, we aim to review the current literature and to propose possible explanations for this phenomenon. Could radiation be the Achilles’ heel of distal transradial artery access?

Experiencia inicial de la revascularización coronaria percutánea mediante el acceso transradial en el Instituto de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular / Initial experience of percutaneous coronary revascularization through transradial access at the Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery

RESUMEN Introducción: En los últimos años la utilización de la vía radial como forma de acceso para la realización de estudios diagnósticos e intervencionista ha cobrado mayor importancia e interés dentro de los servicios de cardiología intervencionista a nivel mundial. Nuestro país no escapa de este auge por la baja tasa de complicación y la mayor comodidad para el paciente. Objetivo: Caracterizar la intervención coronaria percutánea mediante la vía de acceso radial en pacientes atendidos en el Instituto de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular. Método: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, transversal. Muestra compuesta por 211 pacientes a los que se les realizó intervencionismo coronario percutáneo mediante la vía de acceso radial. Resultados: Predominó el sexo masculino (61,2 %). La edad media fue 60,1 ± 9,8 años. El Síndrome Coronario Crónico (76,3 %) fue el diagnóstico mayoritario, la hipertensión arterial el factor de riesgo más frecuente (73,9 %) y entre los antecedentes personales la cardiopatía isquémica (30,3 %). El intervencionismo de forma electiva se realizó en el 76,3 de los casos, utilizando la vía radial derecha en el 88,2 %. Se demostró enfermedad de 2 y 3 vasos en el 45,1 % de los pacientes. El proceder fue exitoso en el 96,7 % de los pacientes. Las variables que demostraron relación estadísticamente significativa con el fracaso fueron: fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo < 40 % (p= 0.0001), filtrado glomerular ≤ 60 ml/min (p= 0.002), antecedente de cardiopatía isquémica (p= 0.016) y presencia de enfermedad coronaria de 3 vasos (p= 0.019). Conclusiones: La intervención coronaria percutánea mediante el acceso radial en el ICCCV es segura y eficaz, con una tasa de éxito elevada y escasas complicaciones.

ABSTRACT Introduction: In recent years the use of the radial approach as a form of access for diagnostic and interventional studies has become increasingly important and of interest in interventional cardiology services worldwide. Our country has not escaped this boom due to the low complication rate and greater patient comfort. Objective: To characterise percutaneous coronary intervention using the radial access route in patients attended at the Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. The sample consisted of 211 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial access route. Results: Male sex predominated (61.2%). Mean age was 60.1 ± 9.8 years. Chronic coronary syndrome (76.3%) was the most common diagnosis, hypertension the most frequent risk factor (73.9%) and ischaemic heart disease (30.3%). Elective intervention was performed in 76.3% of cases, using the right radial approach in 88.2%. Two- and three-vessel disease was demonstrated in 45.1% of patients. The procedure was successful in 96.7% of patients. Variables demonstrating statistically significant relationship with failure were: left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% (p= 0.0001), glomerular filtration rate ≤ 60 ml/min (p= 0.002), history of ischaemic heart disease (p= 0.016) and presence of 3-vessel coronary artery disease (p= 0.019). Conclusions: Percutaneous coronary intervention via radial access in ICCCV is safe and effective, with a high success rate and few complications.

Clinical study of supra-aortic artery stenting angioplasty via transradial access / 介入放射学杂志

Objective To investigate the safety, reliability and effectiveness of supra - aortic artery stenting angioplasty via transradial access in treating supra-aortic artery occlusion or stenosis. Methods The clinical data of 325 consecutive patients with supra-aortic artery occlusion or stenosis, who were admitted to authors' hospital during the period from January 2012 to January 2016 to receive stenting angioplasty, were retrospectively analyzed. According to patient's own will, the 325 patients were divided into transradial access group (n=52) and transfemoral access group (n=273). The results of the puncturing, the operative results, the duration of operation, the amount of intraoperative blood loss, the postoperative complications, the time of postoperative rest in bed, the average time of hospitalization of both groups were recorded. Results No statistically significant differences in the success rate of puncturing, the success rate of operation and the amount of intraoperative blood loss existed between the two groups (P＞0. 05). In 73. 1％ of patients (38/52) of the transradial access group the duration of operation was ≤30 min, while only in 43. 2％ of patients (118/ 273) of the transfemoral access group the duration of operation was ≤30 min, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P＜0. 000 1). After the operation, in transradial access group puncture point bleeding was seen in 8 patients and hematoma at the puncture site in one patient, the complication rate was 17. 3％ (9/52), while in transfemoral access group puncture point bleeding was observed in 23 patients, hematoma at the puncture site in 7 patients, pain of puncture site in one patient, and cerebral hemorrhage in one patient, the total complication rate was 11. 7％ (32/273); but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (χ2=1. 236, P=0. 266). Patients in the transradial access group could get out of bed immediately after the operation. No statistically significant difference in the average time of hospitalization existed between the two groups (P＞0. 05). Conclusion In performing endovascular stenting angioplasty for supra-aortic artery occlusion or stenosis, both transradial access and transfemoral access are safe, reliable and effective. Transradial access can be used as a replacement of transfemoral access. (J Intervent Radiol, 2018, 27:207-210)

A comparative observational multicenter analysis of the clinical performance of vascular compression devices following transradial arterial access / Análisis comparativo multicéntrico observacional del desempeño clínico de dispositivos de compresión vascular posterior a acceso arterial transradial

Abstract: Introduction: Multiple vascular compression aimed for transradial access have been developed. We aimed to compare the time required to achieve hemostasis in three different radial vascular compression devices. Methods: ST and non-ST elevation MI, unstable and stable angina as well as diagnostic coronary angiograms patients with transradial vascular access (TVA) in 2 centers were enrolled between June 2010-November 2010. Patients were divided according the TVA compression device (TAVCD) used. Group I received TR Band(tm) (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan), Group II received Neptuno(tm) (Biotronik, Berlin, Deutschland) and Group III received Finale(tm) (Merit Medical, South Jordan, UT).Patients were evaluated immediately after TVACD implantation and 24 hour post-procedure follow up. Results: 60 patients were enrolled in this observational study (Group I = 22 patients; Group II = 18; Group III = 20). All patients demonstrated evidence of radial pulse after hemostasis. 28% developed a superficial hematoma (Group I, 31%; Group II, 30%; Group III, 22%). Pain at the access site was uncommon among patients in both immediate and follow-up evaluations, however, 3% (Group I and II) presented paresthesia immediately following the procedure that resolved by the 24-hour evaluation. Conclusion: In our study, all three evaluated radial compression devices successfully achieved hemostasis regardless of the slight alterations of mechanism, yet similarity in aim of non-occlusive compression. Group I (TR band) had a slight increase in compression time recorded but all groups required an approximate three hours to display no evidence of bleeding. None of the patients in the study presented major vascular complications. We consider that further investigation of radial compression devices as compared to manual compression are necessary to evaluate their advantages and may further simplify the procedure

Resumen: Introducción: Múltiples dispositivos de compresión vascular para el acceso radial han sido desarrollados. Nuestro objetivo es comparar el tiempo requerido para lograr la hemostasis con tres diferentes dispositivos de compresión vascular radial. Métodos: Pacientes de angiografía coronaria de diagnóstico, con elevación y no elevación del ST, con angina de pecho inestable y estable, así como pacientes con acceso vascular radial (AVR) en dos centros, fueron incluidos entre junio y noviembre de 2010. Los pacientes fueron divididos según el dispositivo de compresión AVR (DCAVR) usado. Al Grupo I se le dio el TR Band(tm) (Terumo, Tokio, Japón), el Grupo II recibió el Neptuno(tm) (Biotronik, Berlín, Alemania) y el grupo III recibió el Final(tm) (Merit Medica, South Jordan, UT). Los pacientes fueron evaluados inmediatamente después de la implantación del DCAVR y a las 24 horas de postprocedimiento para seguimiento. Resultados: 60 pacientes fueron incluidos en este estudio observacional (Grupo I = 22 pacientes; Grupo II = 18; Grupo III = 20). Todos los pacientes mostraron evidencia de pulso radial después de la hemostasis. 28% desarrolló un hematoma superficial (Grupo I, 31%; Grupo II, 30%; Grupo III, 22%). El dolor en el sitio de acceso fue poco común entre los pacientes de los dos evaluaciones inmediatas y de seguimiento, sin embargo, el 3% (Grupo I y II) presentó parestesias inmediatamente después del procedimiento que se resolvieron para la evaluación de 24 horas. Conclusión: En nuestro estudio, los tres dispositivos de compresión radiales evaluados lograron con éxito la hemostasis sin importar las pequeñas variaciones del mecanismo, dando resultados similares en el objetivo de la compresión no oclusiva. Grupo I (Banda TR) tuvo un ligero aumento en el tiempo de compresión registrado pero todos los grupos requieren un tiempo aproximado de tres horas para mostrar ninguna evidencia de sangrado. Ninguno de los pacientes en el estudio presentó mayores complicaciones vasculares. Consideramos necesario hacer investigación adicional de los dispositivos de compresión radiales, en comparación con la compresión manual para evaluar sus ventajas y poder simplificar aún más el procedimiento.