ABSTRACT
Objective@#To study the feasibility, safety and aesthetics of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a single-port through the umbilicus in patients with chronic cholecystitis with cholecystolithiasis.@*Methods@#From Jan 2007 to Jun 2017, the clinical data of 4790 patients who underwent single-port, 4 426 patients conventional three-ports, and 3 304 patients two-ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospectively studied.@*Results@#There were no death in all the three groups. There were no significant differences in the incidences of postoperative bleeding, bile leakage, biliary tract injury and other significant short-term complications (all P>0.05). The operation time of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was significantly longer than that of two-ports and three-ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy [(35.3±9.0)min vs. (28.4±7.2)min vs. (23.3±6.4)min, P<0.05]. Looking only in a single year, there was no significant difference in the operation time of the three groups in the year 2017 (P>0.05). There were no significant differences among the three groups in intraoperative blood loss, first postoperative passing of flatus, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay (all P>0.05). The satisfaction score of surgical scar in the single-port group was higher than that in the two-ports and three-ports groups [(9.6±1.6) vs. (7.6±1.9) vs. (6.7±2.0), P<0.05].@*Conclusions@#Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was safe and feasible, with good aesthetics and other advantages. It was more difficult than the traditional laparoscopic technique. After the learning curve, the operation time could be comparable to the three-ports technique.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the feasibility, safety and aesthetics of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a single-port through the umbilicus in patients with chronic cholecystitis with cholecystolithiasis. Methods From Jan 2007 to Jun 2017, the clinical data of 4790 patients who underwent single-port, 4426 patients conventional three-ports, and 3304 patients two-ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospec-tively studied. Results There were no death in all the three groups. There were no significant differences in the incidences of postoperative bleeding, bile leakage, biliary tract injury and other significant short-term complications (all P>0. 05). The operation time of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was significantly longer than that of two-ports and three-ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy [(35. 3 ± 9. 0) min vs. (28. 4 ± 7. 2)min vs. (23. 3 ± 6. 4)min, P<0. 05]. Looking only in a single year, there was no significant difference in the operation time of the three groups in the year 2017 (P>0. 05). There were no significant differences among the three groups in intraoperative blood loss, first postoperative passing of flatus, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay (all P>0. 05). The satisfaction score of surgical scar in the single-port group was higher than that in the two-ports and three-ports groups [ ( 9. 6 ± 1. 6 ) vs. (7. 6 ± 1. 9) vs. (6. 7 ± 2. 0), P < 0. 05]. Conclusions Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was safe and feasible, with good aesthetics and other advantages. It was more difficult than the traditional laparoscopic technique. After the learning curve, the operation time could be comparable to the three-ports technique.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>Objective</b>To compare the clinical effect of transumbilical single-port laparoscopy combined with improved double hernia needles with that of traditional open surgery in the treatment of hydrocele in children.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We retrospectively analyzed 35 cases (54 sides) of pediatric hydrocele treated by transumbilical single-port laparoscopy combined with improved double hernia needles (laparoscopy group). We recorded the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, scrotal edema, and postoperative complications and compared them with those of another 46 cases (58 sides) treated by traditional open surgery (open surgery group) during the same period.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The laparoscopy group showed a significantly shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, milder scrotal edema, and fewer hospital days than the open surgery group (all P<0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Subcutaneous emphysema developed in 2 patients in the laparoscopy group, which disappeared after 1－3 days of oxygen inhalation and other symptomatic treatment, while scrotal hematoma occurred in 1 and incision fat liquefaction in 2 patients in the open surgery group 3 days postoperatively, which healed after debridement suture and daily dressing, respectively. The patients were followed up for 3－6 months, which revealed no late complications in the laparoscopy group but 1 case of unilateral recurrence and 2 cases of offside recurrence in the open surgery group, all cured by laparoscopic internal ring ligation.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Transumbilical single-port laparoscopy combined with improved double hernia needles is superior to traditional open surgery for the treatment of pediatric hydrocele and therefore deserves clinical generalization.</p>