Effects of in vitro amitriptyline, fluoxetine, tranylcypromine and venlafaxine on saphenous vein grafts

Abstract Objective: In this study, we aimed to examine the effects of amitriptyline, fluoxetine, tranylcypromine and venlafaxine on saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass graft surgeries. Methods: 59 patients (40 males and 19 females; mean age 65.1 years, distribution: 45-84 years) who had coronary artery bypass graft surgery between February 2014 and May 2016 were included in the study. After the saphenous vein grafts with intact and denuded endothelium were precontracted with 3×10-6M phenylephrine, amitriptyline, fluoxetine and tranylcypromine were cumulatively added to isolated organ baths in the range of 10-11-3x10-5M, while venlafaxine was added in the range of 10-9-3×10-5M. Then, the antidepressant-induced relaxation responses were recorded isometrically. Results: While the relaxation response of amitriptyline at -6.42 (Log M) was 74.6%, the response at -6.32 (Log M) was 75.5%. While the relaxation response at -6.46 (Log M) of fluoxetine was 68.02%, the response at -6.02 (Log M) was 72.12%. While the relaxation response of tranylcypromine at -7.53 (Log M) was 61.13%, the response at -7.23 (Log M) was 65.53%. While the relaxation response of venlafaxine at -6.21 (Log M) was 29.98%, the response at -5.90 (Log M) was 32.96%. Conclusion: The maximum relaxation at minimum and maximum therapeutic concentrations was obtained with amitriptyline, fluoxetine and tranylcypromine, and the minimum relaxation was obtained with venlafaxine. The relaxation responses were independent of the endothelium.

Validated, Ultra High Efficiency RP-HPLC and Stability Indicating Method for Determination of Tranylcypromines Sulphate in Bulk and in Tablet Dosage Forms.

Simple, sensitive, rapid and stability indicating ultra high efficiency RP-HPLC method was developed and validated for analysis of Tranylcypromine sulphate in bulk drug and in tablet dosage forms. Well- resolved peaks of target analyte and its degradation products were achieved on a Kinetex® column (75 mm x 4.6 mm ID) 2.6 μm at 30 °C, using simple isocratic mobile phase of acetonitrile - orthophosphoric acid 0.1 % (10: 90, v/v). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the detection was performed at 220 nm. The retention time of the drug was 2 min while for the reported method was 6.7 min. The method was validated according to International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines. Tranylcypromine was subjected to the stress conditions of hydrolytic acidic, basic, oxidative, and photolytic degradation. The assay was linear over the concentration range of 3-150 μg mL-1 and the correlation coefficient was 1. The RSD% of inter and intraday precision was less than 1 %. The % recoveries were found to be 100.58 % proved that the proposed method is sufficiently accurate and precise. The method distinctly separates the drug from its degradation products within 2 min and total run time of 8 min.

MAO-inhibitors in Parkinson's Disease

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAO-I) belong to the earliest drugs tried in Parkinson's disease (PD). They have been used with or without levodopa (L-DOPA). Non-selective MAO-I due to their side-effect/adverse reaction profile, like tranylcypromine have limited use in the treatment of depression in PD, while selective, reversible MAO-A inhibitors are recommended due to their easier clinical handling. For the treatment of akinesia and motor fluctuations selective irreversible MAO-B inhibitors selegiline and rasagiline are recommended. They are safe and well tolerated at the recommended daily doses. Their main differences are related to (1) metabolism, (2) interaction with CYP-enzymes and (3) quantitative properties at the molecular biological/genetic level. Rasagiline is more potent in clinical practise and has a hypothesis driven more favourable side effect/adverse reaction profile due to its metabolism to aminoindan. Both selegiline and rasagiline have a neuroprotective and neurorestaurative potential. A head-to head clinical trial would be of utmost interest from both the clinical outcome and a hypothesis-driven point of view. Selegiline is available as tablet and melting tablet for PD and as transdermal selegiline for depression, while rasagiline is marketed as tablet for PD. In general, the clinical use of MAO-I nowadays is underestimated. There should be more efforts to evaluate their clinical potency as antidepressants and antidementive drugs in addition to the final proof of their disease-modifying potential. In line with this are recent innovative developments of MAO-I plus inhibition of acetylcholine esterase for Alzheimer's disease as well as combined MAO-I and iron chelation for PD.