Satisfaction of medical students in studying histology using virtual and light microscopy: A cross-sectional study

Background@#Medical education has changed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. There has been a shift from face to face learning to virtual classes using online learning platforms such as Canvas. These virtual and online alternative methods to medical education brought up concerns about the preparedness of medical students in studying Histology. This study addresses the student’s preference and attitude on the learning of histology using light microscopy vs virtual microscopy. @*Objectives@#The specific objectives of the study are to determine students’ preference, attitudes, and overall satisfaction on the use of light microscopy vs virtual microscopy using a Likert scale. @*Methods@#An enhancement program was conducted by the Department of Anatomy, UP College of Medicine from June 13 to June 17, 2022 among first year medical students. The students were exposed to prosected cadavers, models, specimens, histologic glass slides, and electronic images. During the activity, the second and third floor of Calderon Hall was divided into several stations, each with its own learning outcomes.This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. In all the learning stations, both virtual and light microscopy learning modalities were made available to the students. The student was at liberty to select virtual microscopy, light microscopy or both. In one of the stations, allocated to OS 205 (The study of the anatomy and histology of the thorax), students were randomized to one learning modality (light vs virtual microscopy) and made to identify one predetermined structure. Students answered a short questionnaire that allowed them to express their preference for the modality that was assigned. The questionnaire survey included questions on students’ preference for either light microscopy (LM) or virtual microscopy (VM), ease of use, and satisfaction. A total of five statements were included in the survey questionnaire. All questions in the survey were scored on a 5-point Likert scale (5: strongly disagree, 4: disagree, 3: neutral, 2: agree, and 1: strongly agree). A comments section was also included in the survey to explore students’ experiences of the two learning methods.@*Results@#A total of 160 students participated in the study. Seventy-nine (79) students were randomized to the light microscopy group and 81 one students were randomized to the virtual microscopy group. There were no differences in the demographic characteristics between those randomized to virtual vs light microscopy.There were no differences in the net ratings between those randomised to virtual vs light microscopy in the following domains: 1) ease in looking for structures, 2) ability to identify the structure correctly, 3) method enhancing learning, and 4) overall satisfaction. There was a difference in the net rating between those randomized to virtual vs light microscopy in the domain on quality of the image being easily adjusted (58% vs 97.5%).@*Conclusion@#Medical students who used light microscopes demonstrated a more positive attitude towards its ability to enhance learning and showed greater satisfaction in using this method. Ease in manipulating image quality was better in the light microscopy group. However, the accuracy of identification of histological structures using either platform did not differ. Both virtual and light microscopy are effective learning methods.

Randomized cross-over study and a qualitative analysis comparing virtual microscopy and light microscopy for learning undergraduate histopathology

Background: Virtual microscopy (VM) use in teaching and learning is increasing worldwide. However, there is a paucity of information comparing it to light microscopy (LM) in learning undergraduate histopathology. We investigated whether VM or LM had a higher impact on student learning and performance in histopathology. In addition, we investigated whether students preferred VM over LM, and whether VM use provided a platform to fulfill the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies. Materials and Methods: We used a sequential exploratory mixed method study design. A qualitative phase inquiring about student preference for VM or LM was followed by a randomized cross-over study. Student preference was measured by an online survey based on a Likert scale. In the cross-over study, students were randomized to either the VM or the LM arm, and their mean scores in standardized exams were compared after using VM and LM. Results: A total of 152 students completed the qualitative study and a total of 64 students participated in the cross-over study. Eighty-three percent (83%) of the students preferred to use VM over LM. Students who used VM scored significantly (P < 0.001) higher [(87.1% vs. 72.4%) and (85.3% vs. 76.1%)], respectively, in both phases of the cross-over study compared to those who used LM. Conclusions: Using VM to learn histopathology has significantly increased student learning and performance compared to using LM.

Academic achievement and perception of two teaching methods in histology: light and digital microscopy: pilot study / Rendimiento académico y percepción de dos métodos de enseñanza en histología: microscopio de luz y microscopio digital: estudio piloto

With new digital systems, the role of the microscope as an irreplaceable instrument in the teaching of histology has been called into question. In this study academic performance and student perception for two learning methods were compared: digital and light microscopy, in the muscle tissue unit of the morphology course for first-year undergraduate dentistry at Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile. 92 students were divided into 2 groups: Group 1: light microscopy and Group 2: digital microscope in a web application. All participants observed the same striate muscle, cardiac striated muscle, and smooth muscle samples. An academic performance test was applied (diagnostic and individual structures identify ability). A perception test was conducted after everyone had learned with both systems. For data analysis the T student test and central tendency with their standard deviation was used. In the cognitive evaluation, the median grades were 5.4 for group 1 and 5.7 for group 2. In the perception survey, 73.24 % considered the virtual microscope evaluation more fair. It was concluded that the use of virtual microscope tends to have better results than light microscopy. Further investigation is needed to evaluate this new teaching instrument.

Los sistemas digitales han puesto en tela de juicio el rol del microscopio óptico como instrumento insustituible para la enseñanza práctica de la histología. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar el rendimiento académico y la percepción de los alumnos utilizando microscopía óptica y microscopía virtual en base a una aplicación web, utilizada por primera vez. Se dividieron 92 alumnos de primer año de Odontología en 2 grupos: 1: microscopía óptica, 2: microscopía digital. Todos observaron los mismos preparados de músculo estriado esquelético, estriado cardíaco y liso. Al finalizar, rindieron una evaluación formativa para medir conocimientos y luego se invertieron los grupos. Una vez que todos aprendieron con ambos sistemas se aplicó un test de percepción. Para el análisis de datos se utilizó el Test-t de student, medidas de tendencia central y desviación estandar. En la evaluación cognitiva se obtuvo un promedio de 5,4 en el grupo 1 y 5,7 el grupo 2. Respecto a la percepción, un 73,24 % consideró que la evaluación con microscopia virtual es más justa. La microscopía vitual tiene una mejor percepción por parte de los alumnos y tiende a mejorar el rendimiento académico. Nuevas investigaciones serán necesarias para evaluar esta herramienta de enseñanza.

Trends in morphology laboratory teaching in basic medical school / 中华医学教育探索杂志

This paper summarized and analyzed the reforming trends in ideas,methods and contents of morphology laboratory education in basic medical school.In order to fulfill the education goals of imparting knowledge and fostering capability and quality education,we should combine the traditional and virtual methods effectively,transform the secondary status ( verifying lecture) of morphology laboratory teaching to independent subject,try to integrate the subjects of morphology,use bilingual education and cultivate scientific research ability.

How can the postgraduate training program in pathology departments in India be improved.

There exists a wide variation in the competence of the postgraduate residents trained in pathology in different institutions across India. This results in strong disparities in the clinical diagnostic skills, teaching skills, research capabilities and the managerial skills of the graduates. The end users of this training, namely the community, clinicians and health care institutions would benefit from a more uniform and better trained pathologist. The article reviews the reasons for the variation in the quality of the training programs. The main deficiencies include, lack of well-defined criteria for recruitment of residents, training facilities, faculty resources, curriculum with well-defined learning objectives and competencies, hands-on experiences in diagnostic and research activities, diagnostic specimens and medical autopsies, exposure to molecular pathology, pathology informatics, electron microscopy, research experiences, communication skills, professional behavior and bioethics, business practices in pathology and quality assurance. There is also a lack of defined career tracks in various disciplines in laboratory medicine, standard protocols for evaluation and regional and national oversight of the programs. The steps for rectification should include defining the competencies and learning objectives, development of the curriculum including teaching methods, facilities and evaluation strategies, communication skills, professional behavior skills, teaching skills, legal aspects of practicing pathology and the various career pathways to subspecialties in pathology. The training should include defined exposure to molecular pathology, electron microscopy, quality control and assurance, laboratory accreditation, business aspects of pathology practice, review of literature, evidence-based medicine, medical autopsy and medical informatics. Efforts should be made to share human and laboratory resources between regional cooperation. The oversight and accreditation policies should be evolved and well-documented. Web-based platforms need to be developed for easy interaction among residents, faculty and administrators on a national level.