ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of esketamine for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in elderly patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.Methods:Ninety elderly female patients, aged 65-78 yr, weighing 46-75 kg, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅱ or Ⅲ, undergoing elective modified radical surgery for breast cancer under general anesthesia, were divided into 2 groups ( n=45 each) using a random number table method: esketamine PCIA group (group E) and sufentanil PCIA group (group S). Anesthesia was induced with target-controlled infusion of propofol, intravenous atracurium besylate and sufentanil and maintained with target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil and intermittent intravenous boluses of cis-benzenesulfonic acid atracurium.The patients were connected to an analgesic pump for PCIA at 10 min before completion of operation.The PCIA solution in group E contained esketamine 2 mg/kg, ketorolac tromethamine 90 mg and tropisetron 5 mg in 100 ml of normal saline.The PCIA solution in group S contained sufentanil 1 μg/kg, ketorolac tromethamine 90 mg and tropisetron 5 mg in 100 ml of normal saline.The PCA pump was set up with a 1.5 ml bolus dose, a 15 min lockout interval and background infusion at a rate of 1.5 ml/h, and the analgesia was performed until 48 h after operation.When numeric rating scale score ≥ 4 points and the efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia was not good, tramadol 100 mg was intravenously injected for rescue analgesia.Steward recovery scores were recorded at 4, 8, 24 and 48 h after operation.The requirement for rescue analgesia, effective pressing times of analgesic pump and time to first flatus were recorded within 48 h after operation.The nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression, dizziness and pruritus within 48 h after operation and delirium within 7 days after operation were recorded.The 40-item Quality of-Recovery scale was used to evaluate the early postoperative recovery of patients at 24 and 48 h after operation. Results:Compared with group S, the 40-item Quality of Recovery scale score was significantly increased at each time point, postoperative time to first flatus was shortened, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and pruritus was decreased ( P<0.05), and no significant change was found in the Steward recovery score at each time point after operation, effective pressing times of PCA and requirement for rescue analgesia in group E ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Esketamine provides better efficacy than sufentanil when used for PCIA in elderly patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To preliminarily evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nalbuphine for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after cesarean section.Methods:This study was a single arm clinical trial.Sixty parturients, aged 20-44 yr, weighing 50-80 kg, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ⅠorⅡ, scheduled for cesarean section with epidural anesthesia, were enrolled in this study.PCIA was performed when visual analogue scale (VAS) score for postoperative pain ≥3 points following cesarean section.A bolus of nalbuphine 10 mg was intravenously injected as a loading dose.PCIA pump solution contained 110 mg nalbuphine diluted to 200 ml with normal saline.The pump was set up with a background infusion at a rate of 4 ml/h, 2 ml bolus dose and 15 min lockout interval.The VAS scores for pain at rest and during activity and uterine contraction pain, Ramsay sedation scores and adverse reactions were observed within 48 h after surgery.Results:The VAS scores for pain at rest and during activity and uterine contraction pain were all ≤3 points, the Ramsay scores were maintained at 2-4 points, hemodynamic parameters were maintained in the normal range, and no adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting, drowsiness, hyperhidrosis, dizziness, pruritus, and respiratory depression occurred.Conclusion:PCIA with nalbuphine given according to the method mentioned above has good feasibility when used for analgesia following cesarean section.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the effect of epidural labor analgesia administration methods on occurrence of postpartum urinary retention in nulliparous parturients through a comparison between programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) and continuous epidural infusion.Methods:Two hundred nulliparous parturients who were at full term with a singleton fetus in vertex presentation, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, aged 22-35 yr, with body mass index of 22.4-42.6 kg/m 2, were divided into 2 groups ( n=100 each) using a random number table method: continuous epidural infusion group (group CEI) and group PIEB.Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) was performed in active phase of labor (cervical dilatation≥1 cm) during the first stage of labor.The PCEA solution contained the mixture (10 ml) of 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.5 μg/ml sufentanil.The PCEA pump was set up to deliver a 5-ml bolus dose with a 30-min lockout interval.The analgesia solution contained the mixture (100 ml) of 0.08% ropivacaine and sufentanil 0.5 μg/ml.In group CEI, the drugs were given at 8 ml/h immediately after the initial dose.PIEB regimens were programmed as 8 ml over 80 s once an h after the initial bolus, and the administration was stopped after delivery of fetus.The labor time, consumption of analgesia solution and the incidence of postpartum urinary retention were recorded. Results:Compared with group CEI, the duration of the second stage of labor was significantly shortened, and consumption of analgesia solution and the incidence of postpartum urinary retention were decreased in group PIEB ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with the continuous epidural infusion, the application of PIEB in labor analgesia can reduce the incidence of postpartum urinary retention in nulliparous parturients.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the effects of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with esketamine on postpartum depression (PPD) in puerpera undergoing cesarean section.Methods:A total of 300 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients, aged 25-35 yr, with body mass index≤35 kg/m 2, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, were divided into 2 groups ( n=150 each) by a random number table method: control group (group C) and esketamine group (group E). PCIA was performed at the end of surgery.In group C, the PCIA solution contained sufentanil citrate 50 μg, butorphanol tartrate 12 mg and metoclopramide injection 20 mg in 200 ml of 0.9% normal saline.In group E, the PCIA solution contained esketamine 1 mg/kg, sufentanil citrate 50 μg, butorphanol tartrate 12 mg and metoclopramide injection 20 mg in 200 ml of 0.9% normal saline.The PCA pump was set to deliver a background infusion of 4 ml/h and a bolus dose of 4 ml at 30 min lockout interval.The analgesia lasted for 48 h after surgery, and the visual analog scale (VAS) score was maintained<4 points.Acetaminophen 0.5 g was administered orally as a rescue analgesic when VAS score≥4 points and pain was still unrelieved after PCA pump was pressed twice in a row.The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was performed at 1 day before and at 3, 7 and 42 days after surgery.Depression was classified on EPDS as mild (score≥10) and severe (score≥13). The patients with preoperative depression were excluded from the study.The occurrence and degree of depression were recorded.The requirement for rescue analgesia within 0-6 h, 6-12 h, 12-24 h and 24-48 h after surgery and development of adverse effects within 3 days after surgery were recorded. Results:Compared with group C, the incidence of PPD was significantly decreased and degree was reduced at 3 and 7 days after surgery, incidence of rescue analgesia was decreased in different time periods ( P<0.05), and no significant change was found in the incidence of adverse effects in group E ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Esketamine can not only provide good postoperative analgesia but also improve PPD in puerpera when it is used for PCIA after cesarean section.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with tramadol on intravenous analgesia and sleep quality after cesarean section.Methods:One hundred and twenty pregnant women who underwent cesarean section in Zhongshan Boai Hospital from March 2019 to July 2020 were selected. They were randomly divided into four groups, with 30 patients in each group. The patients in group Awere given patient controlled anesthesia with tramadol 800 mg+ tropisetron 5mg after cesarean section, and the patients in group B1, B2 and B3 were given 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 μg/kg dexmedetomidine on the basis of group A. The scores of exercise and rest of visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after the surgery were observed. The scores of Athens insomnia scale (AIS) before and after surgery were compared. The Ramsay sedation scores and basic vital signs were recorded, compared and analyzed at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after the surgery. The incidence of adverse reactions within 48 h after the surgery was counted in the four groups.Results:The scores of exercise and rest of VAS at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after the surgery in four groups had significant differences ( P<0.05). The scores of group A were the highest, and next were the group B1, B2 and B3. The scores of AIS at 1 and 2 d after surgery in four groups had significant differences ( P<0.05).The scores of group A were the highest, and next were the group B1, B2 and B3.The level of oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO 2) after surgery in four groups had no significant difference ( P>0.05). The levels of systolicblood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) after surgery in four groups had significant differences ( P<0.05). The levels of SBP, DBP, HR in group A were the highest, and next were the group B1, B2 and B3. Thelevels of SBP, DBP, HR in group A, B1 and B2 were in normal range, but the levels of SBP, DBP and HR in group B3 were in lower limits of normal, the level of HR in some patients was below normal. The Ramsay sedation scores at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery in the four groups had significant differences ( P<0.05). Ramsay sedation scores in group A were the lowest, and next were the group B1, B2 and B3. The total incidence of adverse reactions in group B3 was the highest with 33.33%(10/30), and in group B1 was the lowest with 6.67%(2/30). Conclusions:Medium dose of dexmedetomidine (1.5 μg/kg) combined with tramadol has a good effect on postoperative intravenous sedation and analgesia in patients after cesarean section, which can improve the sleep quality of patients. Besides, the drug safety can be guaranteed.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare the effects of alone and combined administration of nalbuphine and sufentanyl for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after caesarean section.@*Methods@#From June 2017 to December 2017, 90 women undergoing cesarean section in the Sixth Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University were selected.They were divided into three groups(with 30 cases in each group) using a random number table: sufentanyl 1.5μg/kg group (group S), nalbuphine 2.0mg/kg group (group N) and nalbuphine 1.0mg/kg+ sufentanyl 1μg/kg group (group NS). In each group tropisetron 6 mg was added, and PCIA solution was then diluted to 10mL in normal saline.Postoperative vital signs, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, the highest Ramsay sedation score, number of self-control analgesia and the occurrence of side effects within 24h after operation were recorded.@*Results@#The highest VAS score within 24h after surgery had statistically significant difference among the three groups [group N (2.66±1.09)points > group S (1.45±0.57)points > group NS (0.90±0.55)points](F=40.11, P<0.05). The Ramsay sedation score among the three groups had no statistically significant difference [group S (2.34±0.61)points, group N (3.13±0.63)points, group NS (2.60±0.72)points] (F=11.00, P>0.05). The number of controlled analgesia among the three groups had no statistically significant difference [group S (0.76±0.69), group N (2.93±0.87), group NS (0.54±0.57)] (F=101.11, P>0.05). The incidence rates of adverse reactions of the three groups were 26.66%(8/30), 16.67%(5/30) and 6.66%(2/30), respecyively, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).@*Conclusion@#Combination of nalbuphine and sufentanyl has more significant effect of PCIA after cesarean section than either of the drugs use alone, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided continuous anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) on postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty.Methods Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅱ or Ⅲ patients of both sexes,aged 65-80 yr,weighing 45-80 kg,scheduled for elective total hip arthroplasty under subarachnoid block,were divided into 2 groups (n =25 each) using a random number table method:ultrasound-guided continuous anterior quadratus lumborum block group (group Q) and routine analgesia group (group R).Anterior QLB was performed at the end of operation in group Q.Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia was performed with sufentanil after operation in two groups.Dezocine was given as rescue analgesic.Ramsay sedation score and the maximum angle for hip flexion and abduction of hip joint were recorded after operation,and the total consumption of sufentanil,requirement for dezocine and occurrence of adverse reactions were recorded within 72 h after operation.The occurrence of QLB-related complications was also recorded.Results Compared with group R,Ramsay sedation score was significantly decreased and the maximum angle for hip flexion and abduction of hip joint were increased at each time point after operation,and the total consumption of sufentanil,requirement for dezocine and incidence of nausea and vomiting were decreased in group Q (P < 0.05).No QLB-related complications were found in group Q.Conclusion Ultrasound-guided continuous anterior QLB can produce better postoperative analgesia and reduce postoperative consumption of opioids with fewer adverse reactions in the patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of patient-controlled brachial plexus block with different concentrations of dexmedetomidine mixed with ropivacaine for analgesia after elbow joint surgery.Methods One hundred patients of both sexes,aged 18-64 yr,weighing 45-75 kg,of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ,undergoing elbow joint surgedyy,were divided into 4 groups (n =25 each) using a random number table method:different concentrations of dexmedetomidine mixed with ropivacaine groups (DR1-3 groups) and ropivacaine group (group R).An analgesia pump was connected at the end of surgery and patient-controlled brachial plexus block was performed.The patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) solution contained 0.5 μg/ml dexmedetomidine and 0.2% ropivacaine in group DR1,0.75 μg/ml dexmedetomidine and 0.2% ropivacaine in group DR2,1 μg/ml dexmedetomidine and 0.2% ropivacaine in group DR3 and 0.3% ropivacaine in group R.All the drugs were diluted to 400 ml in normal saline in each group.The PCA pump was set up to deliver 3 ml bolus dose with a 20-min lockout interval and background infusion at 5 ml/h.Parecoxib 0.6 mg/kg was intravenously injected as a rescue analgesic.The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at rest and during movement (voluntary and continuous passive movement) were recorded at the end of surgery and 12,24,36,48 and 72 h after surgery.The number of successfully delivered doses,the number of attempt and postoperative consumption of parecoxib were recorded.The elbow flexion angle during voluntary and continuous passive movement was recorded.The development of motor block and drug-related adverse reactions was also recorded.Results There was no significant difference in VAS scores at rest at each time point among the four groups (P>0.05).Compared with group R,the VAS scores during movement,the number of attempts,the number of successfully delivered doses and parecoxib consumption were significantly increased in DR1 and DR2 groups,the elbow flexion angle during voluntary and continuous passive mnovement was significantly decreased in group DR1,the elbow flexion angle during continuous passive movement was significantly decreased in group DR2,and the elbow flexion angle during voluntary movement was significantly increased (P<0.05),and no significant change was found in the other parameters in group DR3 (P>0.05).Compared with group DR1,the VAS scores during movement were significantly decreased,the number of attempts,the number of successfully delivered doses and parecoxib consumption were decreased,and the elbow flexion angle during voluntary and continuous passive movement was increased in DR2 and DR3 groups (P<0.05).Compared with group DR2,the VAS scores during movement were significantly decreased,the number of attempts,the number of successfully delivered doses and parecoxib consumption were decreased,and the elbow flexion angle during voluntary and continuous passive movement was increased in group DR3 (P<0.05).No motor block was found in DR1,DR2,and DR3 groups,and the incidence of motor block was significantly higher in group R than in the other three groups (P<0.05).The hemodynamics was stable and no drug-related adverse reactions were found in the perioperative period in the four groups.Conclusion Patient-controlled brachial plexus block with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/ml mixed with 0.2% ropivacaine can provide satisfactory analgesia and is helpful in improving prognosis for the patients undergoing elbow joint surgery.
ABSTRACT
Objective To determine the optimal dose of dexmedetomidine required to prevent nausea and vomiting when used for postoperative analgesia after gynecological laparoscopic surgery.Methods A total of 135 patients,aged 18-60 yr,weighing 52-80 kg,of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or Ⅱ,scheduled for elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery,were divided into 3 groups (n=45 each) using a random number table method:control group (group C),dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg group (group D1) and dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg group (group D2).Immediately after anesthesia induction,dexmedetomidine 0.4 μg · kg-1 · h-1 was injected intravenously until 30 min before the end of surgery in all the patients.When the patient was fully awake at the end of surgery,the tracheal tube was removed,and patients were sent to postanesthesia care unit and received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA).The PCIA solution contained sufentanil 1.2 μg/kg and dezocine 20 mg in 100 ml of 0.9% normal saline.The PCIA pump was set up with a 0.5 ml bolus dose,a 15 min lockout interval and background infusion at a rate of 2 ml/h.Dexmedetomidine 1 and 2 μg/kg were added to PCIA solution in group D1 and group D2,respectively.The occurrence of nausea and vomiting was recorded in postanesthesia care unit stay period (P1) and in 0-12 h (P2),12-24 h (P3),24-36 h (P4) and 36-48 h (P5) periods after patients returned to the ward.Ramsay sedation score was recorded at 12,24,36 and 48 h after patients returned to the ward.When visual analogue scale score >3,patients were told to press PCIA.Patients were followed up for 48 h after surgery,and patients' satisfaction,pressing times of PCIA and occurrence of pruritus,respiratory depression,bradycardia and dizziness were recorded.Results Compared with group C,the incidence of nausea was significantly decreased in P2 period,and the pressing times of PCIA were reduced in P2,3 period in D1 and D2 groups (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in Ramsay sedation score at each time point,patients' satisfaction and incidence of bradycardia among the three groups (P>0.05).No patients developed pruritus,respiratory depression or dizziness in the three groups.Conclusion The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine required to prevent nausea and vomiting is 1 μg/kg when used for postoperative analgesia after gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the effects of alone and combined administration of nalbuphine and sufen-tanyl for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia ( PCIA) after caesarean section.Methods From June 2017 to December 2017,90 women undergoing cesarean section in the Sixth Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University were selected.They were divided into three groups (with 30 cases in each group) using a random number table :sufent-anyl 1.5μg/kg group (group S),nalbuphine 2.0mg/kg group ( group N) and nalbuphine 1.0mg/kg+sufentanyl 1μg/kg group (group NS).In each group tropisetron 6 mg was added,and PCIA solution was then diluted to 10mL in normal saline.Postoperative vital signs, visual analogue scale ( VAS) score, the highest Ramsay sedation score , number of self-control analgesia and the occurrence of side effects within 24h after operation were recorded. Results The highest VAS score within 24h after surgery had statistically significant difference among the three groups [group N (2.66 ±1.09)points >group S (1.45 ±0.57) points >group NS (0.90 ±0.55) points] ( F=40.11,P<0.05).The Ramsay sedation score among the three groups had no statistically significant difference [group S (2.34 ±0.61)points,group N (3.13 ±0.63)points,group NS (2.60 ±0.72)points] (F=11.00,P>0.05).The number of controlled analgesia among the three groups had no statistically significant difference [ group S (0.76 ± 0.69),group N (2.93 ±0.87),group NS (0.54 ±0.57)] (F=101.11,P>0.05).The incidence rates of adverse reactions of the three groups were 26.66%(8/30),16.67%(5/30) and 6.66%(2/30),respecyively,the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion Combination of nalbuphine and sufentanyl has more signifi-cant effect of PCIA after cesarean section than either of the drugs use alone ,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the influences of early implementation of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) in labor on uterine myoelectrical activity and delivery outcomes. Methods A prospective study was conducted on 240 singleton cephalic primiparae with spontaneous labor at Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center from January 2015 to October 2018. Those women, who were ready to accept PCEA, were randomly assigned to early- or late-PCEA group based on cervical dilation of 0-3 cm or 3-6 cm at the time of commencing PCEA, while those who refused PCEA in labor were classified as non-PCEA group. Uterine electromyographic activity and visual analogue score (VAS)were recorded before and 1 h and 2 h after PCEA. Patient satisfaction with labor, duration of the first stage of labor, volume of postpartum bleeding within 2 h after delivery and neonatal Apgar score were compared between different groups using multivariate analysis of variance, repeated measures analysis of variance, LSD-t test or Chi-square test. Results The VAS values 1 h after PCEA in the early- and late-PCEA group were both lower than that in the non-PCEA group (2.08±1.34 and 2.00±1.28 vs 7.65±1.04, LSD-t were - 27.713 and - 27.663, P<0.001) and those before PCEA (7.65±0.91 and 7.62±0.86, LSD-t were -32.879 and -33.349, P<0.001). The VAS values 2 h after PCEA in the early- and late-PCEA group were both lower than that in the non-PCEA group (1.63±1.53 and 1.41±1.56 vs 7.66±0.87, LSD-t were -27.018 and -27.823, P<0.001) and those before PCEA (LSD-t were -31.379 and -32.718, P<0.001).The patient satisfaction rate with labor was higher in the early-PCEA group comparing to the late-PCEA group [80.0% (72/90) vs 61.1% (55/90), P<0.001], and the two figures above were both higher than that of the non-PCEA group [20.0% (12/60), both P<0.001]. There was no significant difference in the duration of the first stage of labor, the volume of postpartum blood loss 2 h after delivery, oxytocin usage rate, the rate of convertion to cesarean section, neonatal birth weight or Apgar score at 1 or 5 min among the three groups (all P>0.05). There was also no significant difference in uterine electromyographic parameters among the three groups before or 2 h after PCEA (all P>0.05). The number and duration of burst, power density spectrum peak frequency, root mean square and total power 1 h after PCEA in the early- and later-PCEA group were all lower than those in the non-PCEA group [4.80±2.49 and 5.54±3.04 vs 9.67±2.44; (34.41±1.21) and (36.94±1.18) vs (41.68±1.53) s; (0.36±0.08) and (0.36±0.07) vs (0.48±0.05) Hz ; (0.05±0.04) and (0.05±0.05) vs (0.07±0.05) mV; (4.33±0.51) and (5.36 ±0.59) vs (9.90±1.43) pV2; all P<0.05]. Conclusions The effect of PCEA on uterine myoelectrical activity has no association with the commencing time. While early PCEA could alleviate the labor pain as soon as possible, which enable us to improve the efficacy of labor analgesia, patient satisfaction and maternal and neonatal safety without increasing cesarean section rate.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of different approaches to thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block on the analgesic efficacy after lumbar spinal fusion.Methods Seventy-five patients of both sexes,of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ,aged 40-70 yr,with body mass index ≤40 kg/m2,undergoing posterior median approach to lumbar spinal fusion,were divided into 3 groups (n =25 each) using a random number table method:patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) group (group P),medial approach to TLIP combined with PCIA group (group MP) and lateral approach to TLIP combined with PCIA group (group LP).TLIP block was performed by advancing the block needle in a lateral to medial direction and injecting 0.5% ropivacaine 20 ml locally between the bilateral multifidus and longissimus muscles in group MP.TLIP block was performed by advancing the block needle in a medial to lateral direction and injecting 0.5% ropivacaine 20 ml locally between the bilateral longissimus and iliocostalis muscles in group LP.The identification rate and distinction score between multifidus and iliocostalis muscles obtained from ultrasonic images were recorded before block in MP and LP groups.All the patients received PCIA until 48 h after surgery.PCIA solution contained sufentanil 100 μg and tropisetron 10 mg diluted to 100 ml with 0.9% normal saline.The PCA pump was set up with a 2 ml bolus dose,a 15-min lockout interval and background infusion at a rate of 1 ml/h.When visual analogue scale score at rest >4 after surgery,parecoxib 40 mg was intravenously injected for rescue analgesia.The development of adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting was recorded within 48 h after surgery.Results The identification rate and distinction score of the iliocostalis was significantly higher than that of the multifidus (P<0.05).Compared with group P,the intraoperative consumption of propofol and remifentanil was significantly decreased,the pressing times of PCA,amount of drugs consumed in PCA and consumption of parecoxib were decreased within 48 h after surgery (P<0.05),and no significant change was found in the incidence of nausea or vomiting in MP and LP groups (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the parameters mentioned above between group MP and group LP (P>0.05).Conclusion Ultrasound-guided medial and lateral approaches to TLIP block is helpful in achieving low-dose opioid anesthesia mode and more helpful in enhancing the efficacy of PCIA when used for lumbar spinal fusion.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of serratus plane block (SPB) combined with general anesthesia and SPB with patient-controlled nerve analgesia (PCNA) after surgery on the early postoperative quality of recovery in the patients undergoing radical mastectomy.Methods Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ female patients,aged 18-64 yr,weighing 45-70 kg,scheduled for elective unilateral modified radical mastectomy under general anesthesia,were assigned into 3 groups (n=20 each) using a computer software:SPB and general anesthesia plus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) group (SG+PCIA group),SPB and general anesthesia plus SPB with PCNA group (SG+PCNA group),and general anesthesia plus PCIA group (G+PCIA group).Ultrasound-guided ipsilateral SPB was performed before anesthesia induction.Analgesia was maintained with propofol-remifentanilsevoflurane,rocuronium or vecuronium was intermittently injected to maintain muscle relaxation.PCIA solution contained tramadol 800 mg and flurbiprofen axetil 100 mg in 54 ml of normal saline,and the PCA pump was set up to deliver a 2 ml bolus dose,with a 15 min lockout interval and background infusion at a rate of 0.5 ml/h after a loading dose of 5 ml.The location of the indwelling catheter was confirmed again using ultrasound at the end of surgery,PCNA solution contained 1% ropivacaine 500 mg in 250 ml of normal saline,and the PCA pump was set up to deliver a 5 ml bolus dose,with a 45 min lockout interval and background infusion at a rate of 5 ml/h after a loading dose of 5 ml.The PCA pumps were used until 48 h after surgery.The automatic key was pressed when pain scores (numerical rating scale [NRS] scores) ≥ 4 at rest or during activity (at 45° ipsilateral upper extremity-up tilt).Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) score was used to assess the early postoperative quality of recovery at 24 and 48 h after surgery.NRS scores at rest or during activity were recorded at 6,8,12,24 and 48 h after surgery.The total pressing times of PCA and occurrence of adverse reactions such as respiratory depression,pruritus,infection at the puncture site or pneumothorax were also recorded.Results Compared with group G+PCIA,the postoperative QoR40 scores were significantly increased,NRS scores at rest or during activity were decreased at each time point after surgery,and the total pressing times of PCA were reduced in SG+PCIA and SG+PCNA groups,the incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly decreased in group SG+PCIA,and the incidence of nausea and vomiting and dizziness was significantly decreased in group SG+PCNA (P<0.05 or 0.01).Compared with group SG+PCIA,the postoperative QoR-40 scores were significantly increased at 24 h after surgery,and NRS scores at rest or during activity were decreased after surgery in group SG+PCNA (P< 0.05 or 0.01).Conclusion SPB combined with general anesthesia and SPB with PCNA after surgery can raise the early postoperative quality of recovery in the patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the optimum compatibility of nalbufine combined with ropivacaine for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) after cesarean section.Methods A total of 100 parturients who were at full term with a singleton fetus,aged 24-35 yr,with body mass index of 29-33 kg/m2,of American society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅱ,scheduled for elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia,were divided into 4 groups (n =25 each) using a random number table method:sufentanil 0.5 μg/ml plus 0.15% ropivacaine group (SR group),nalbufine at final concentration of 0.2 mg/ml plus 0.15% ropivacaine group (N1 R group),nalbufine at final concentration of 0.4 mg/ml plus 0.15% ropivacaine group (N2R group) and nalbufine at final concentration of 0.4 mg/ml plus 0.1% ropivacaine group (N3Rgroup).PCEA solution was prepared correspondingly after surgery,and all the drugs were diluted to 100 ml in normal saline in each group.The PCA pump was set up to deliver a 0.5 ml bolus dose with a 15-min lockout interval and background infusion at 2 ml/h.Visual analog scale scores of incisional pain and anduterine contraction pain were maintained<4.Ramsay sedation scores were recorded at 8,12,24 and 48 h after surgery.The total pressing times of PCEA were recorded within 48 h after surgery.The development of adverse reactions such as nausea,vomiting,skin itching,numbness of lower extremity,urinary retention and respiratory depression was recorded in the analgesia period.Venous blood samples were collected before surgery and at 24 and 48 h after surgery for determination of plasma prolactin concentrations,and the time of colostrum was recorded.Neonatal nerve and adaptive capacity was assessed and scored.Results Compared with group SR,the total pressing times of PCEA were significantly reduced in N2R and N3R groups (P<0.05),and no significant change was found in the total pressing times of PCEA in group N1R (P>0.05).Compared with group N1R,the total pressing times of PCEA were significantly reduced in N2R and N3 R groups (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total pressing times of PCEA between group N2R and group N3R (P>0.05).The Ramsay sedation score was 2 in four groups.There was no significant difference in numbness of lower extremity,plasma prolactin concentrations or neonatal nerve and adaptive capacity scores among four groups (P>0.05).Conclusion Nalbufine at final concentraction of 0.4 mg/ml mixed with 0.1% ropivacaine is the optimum compatibility when used for PCEA after cesarean section.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block combined with butopenol patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) for analgesia after cesarean section under general anesthesia.Methods Ninety American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ parturients,aged 18-42 yr,weighing 52-88 kg,at 38-42 weeks of gestation,scheduled for elective cesarean section under general anesthesia,were divided into 3 groups (n=30 each) using a random number table method:TAP block group (group TAP),butopenol PCIA group (group B) and TAP block plus butopenol PCIA group (group TB).In group TAP,bilateral TAP blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance at the end of surgery,and 0.375% ropivacaine 20 ml was injected into each side.In group B,butopenol 1 mg was intravenously injected at 30 min before the end of operation,PCIA was performed at the end of surgery,PCIA solution contained butopenol 8 mg and ondansetron 8 mg (diluted to 100 ml in sodium chloride injection),and the PCIA pump was set up to deliver a 0.5 ml bolus dose with a 15-min lockout interval and background infusion at 2 ml/h.Butopenol 1 mg was intravenously injected at 30 min before the end of operation,and TAP block in combination with butopenol PCIA was performed at the end of operation in group TB.When the postoperative visual analog scale score was greater than or equal to 4 points,morphine 10 mg was intramuscularly injected as rescue analgesic.The requirement for morphine was recorded within 48 h after operation.The occurrence of agitation during emergence from anesthesia and adverse reactions within 48 h after operation were also recorded.Results No adverse reactions such as hematoma at the puncture site or local anesthetic intoxication were observed in TAP group and TB group.Compared with group TAP,the incidence of postoperative shivering and requirement for morphine were significantly decreased in group TB (P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative nausea and v omiting and requirement for morphine were significantly lower in group TB than in group B (P<0.05).Conclusion The combination of TAP block and butopenol PCIA exerts better efficacy for analgesia after cesarean section under general anesthesia than either alone.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the optimum compatibility of nabufine mixed with flurbiprofen for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after gynecological laparoscopic surgery.Methods A total of 210 patients,aged 18-64 yr,with body mass index of 18-30 kg/m2,of American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ,scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia,were divided into 4 groups using a random number table method:sufentanil 2.0 μg/kg+flurbiprofen axetil 2.0 mg/kg group (SF group,n =55),nalbuphine 1.5 mg/kg+flurbiprofen axetil 2.0 mg/kg group (N1 F group,n=49),nalbuphine 2.0 mg/kg+flurbiprofen axetil 2.0 mg/kg group (N2F group,n =55) and nalbuphine 3.0 mg/kg +flurbiprofen axetil 2.0 mg/kg group (N3F group,n=51).PCIA solution was prepared correspondingly after surgery in each group.The PCA pump was set up to deliver a 1 ml bolus dose with a 15-min lockout interval and background infusion at 2.0 ml/h.Nalbuphine 5 mg or sufentanil 5 μg was intravenously injected as a rescue analgesic to maintain visual analogue scale score at rest <4 at 48 h after surgery in SF and N1 F-N3F groups.Ramsay sedation scores were recorded on admission to post-anesthesia care unit (T1),at the time of post-anesthesia care unit discharge (T2) and at 6,24 and 48 h after surgery (T3-5).The total pressing times of PCIA in 0-6 h,6-24 h and 24-48 h periods after surgery and requirement for rescue analgesics were recorded.The incidence of adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting,drowsiness and shivering within 48 h after surgery was also recorded.Results Compared with group SF,the incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly decreased in N1 F and N2F groups,the requirement for rescue analgesics was significantly decreased,and the total pressing times of PCIA was reduced in N2F and N3 F groups,and Ramsay sedation scores at T3,4 were significantly increased in group N3F (P<0.05).Compared with group N1 F,the requirement for rescue analgesics was significantly decreased,and the total pressing times of PCIA was reduced in N2F and N3F groups,and the incidence of nausea and vomiting and Ramsay sedation scores at T3,4 were significantly increased in group N3F (P<0.05).Compared with group N2F,the incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly increased (P< 0.05),and no significant change was found in the requirement for rescue analgesics,total pressing times of PCIA or Ramsay sedation scores in group N3F (P>0.05).Conclusion Nabufine 2.0 mg/kg mixed with flurbiprofen 2.0 mg/kg is the optimum compatibility when used for PCIA after gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the effect and safety of intermittent epidural bolus without background infusion combined with patient-control epidural analgesia (PCEA) in transurethral resection of prostate. Methods Sixty patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from January to August 2018 were selected, and the patients were treated with transurethral (plasma) resection of prostate. The patients were divided into test group and control group according to the random digits table method with 30 cases each. Postoperative epidural analgesia of 2 groups used the electronic analgesia pump. The analgesia mode of test group was intermittent epidural bolus without background infusion combined with PCEA, and the analgesia mode of control group was continuous infusion combined with PCEA. The visual analogue score (VAS), Ramsay sedation score, improved Bromage score, adverse reaction and satisfaction of patients end of surgery to 48 h after operation were compared between 2 groups. Results There were no statistical difference in VAS and Ramsay sedation score between 2 groups (P>0.05). The improved Bromage score 6 h after operation in test group was significantly lower than that in control group: 0 (0, 0) score vs. 0.5 (0, 1.0) scores, there was statistical difference (P<0.05). The dosage of electronic analgesic pump 48 h after operation in test group was significantly lower than that in control group: (159.73 ± 22.58) ml vs. 250 ml, there was statistical difference (P<0.01). The patients in 2 groups were satisfied, and there was no obvious dissatisfaction. There was no statistical difference in incidence of adverse reaction between 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusions In the postoperative analgesia of transurethral (plasma) resection of prostate, intermittent epidural bolus without background infusion combined with PCEA can decrease the drug dosage without the decline of analgesia.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To determine the optimal dose of dexmedetomidine required to prevent nausea and vomiting when used for postoperative analgesia after gynecological laparoscopic surgery.@*Methods@#A total of 135 patients, aged 18-60 yr, weighing 52-80 kg, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery, were divided into 3 groups (n=45 each) using a random number table method: control group (group C), dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg group (group D1) and dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg group (group D2). Immediately after anesthesia induction, dexmedetomidine 0.4 μg·kg-1·h-1 was injected intravenously until 30 min before the end of surgery in all the patients.When the patient was fully awake at the end of surgery, the tracheal tube was removed, and patients were sent to postanesthesia care unit and received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). The PCIA solution contained sufentanil 1.2 μg/kg and dezocine 20 mg in 100 ml of 0.9% normal saline.The PCIA pump was set up with a 0.5 ml bolus dose, a 15 min lockout interval and background infusion at a rate of 2 ml/h.Dexmedetomidine 1 and 2 μg/kg were added to PCIA solution in group D1 and group D2, respectively.The occurrence of nausea and vomiting was recorded in postanesthesia care unit stay period (P1) and in 0-12 h (P2), 12-24 h (P3), 24-36 h (P4) and 36-48 h (P5) periods after patients returned to the ward.Ramsay sedation score was recorded at 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after patients returned to the ward.When visual analogue scale score >3, patients were told to press PCIA.Patients were followed up for 48 h after surgery, and patients′ satisfaction, pressing times of PCIA and occurrence of pruritus, respiratory depression, bradycardia and dizziness were recorded.@*Results@#Compared with group C, the incidence of nausea was significantly decreased in P2 period, and the pressing times of PCIA were reduced in P2, 3 period in D1 and D2 groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Ramsay sedation score at each time point, patients′ satisfaction and incidence of bradycardia among the three groups (P>0.05). No patients developed pruritus, respiratory depression or dizziness in the three groups.@*Conclusion@#The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine required to prevent nausea and vomiting is 1 μg/kg when used for postoperative analgesia after gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
ABSTRACT
Conventional patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is widely used for postoperative analgesia.Although conventional PCA raises the level of administration according to patient's individual needs,there are still quite a few patients whose postoperative pain has not been effectively alleviated.The main cause is that it is difficult to access and respond to the key information of the analgesic process in real-time.Artificial intelligence PCA (Ai-PCA) is a new analgesic system which combined conventional PCA with Internet of Things and artificial intelligence.Ai-PCA makes analgesic process achieve dynamic control and raises analgesic quality.Chinese Society of Anesthesiology organized experts to formulate the first "expert consensus on management of artificial intelligent patient-controlled analgesia" to further promote Ai-PCA.The consensus introduces the technical reference standards of Ai-PCA and provides the standardized requirements for clinical implementation and quality control.Although the consensus has been revised and discussed repeatedly by experts,the deficiency is unavoidable.Opinions and suggestions are warmly welcome,in order to update the consensus in the future.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of intelligentized patient-controlled analgesia ( PCA) management on the quality of postoperative analgesia in the patients. Methods A total of 6601 patients who underwent postoperative PCA from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017 searched from the intelli-gentized PCA system database were selected as intelligentized PCA management group ( I group) , and then were divided into 3 subgroups according to the year: 2015 subgroup ( n=2221 ) , 2016 subgroup ( n=2152) and 2017 subgroup (n=2228). A total of 1235 patients who underwent PCA which was mainly performed by a department of anesthesiology in the postoperative analgesia-related multi-center questionnaire from April 11, 2016 to April 22, 2016 in 12 grade A tertiary hospitals in Guangdong Province were select-ed as the traditional PCA management group (C group). The development of moderate and severe pain, nausea and vomiting, over-sedation at rest and during activity and patient′s satisfaction were recorded on 1st and 2nd days after operation. Results Compared with C group, the incidence of moderate and severe pain, nausea and vomiting and over-sedation at rest and during activity was significantly decreased, and the rate of patient′s satisfaction was increased at each time point after operation in I group ( P<0. 05 or 0. 01) . Com-pared with 2015 subgroup, the incidence of moderate and severe pain at rest and severe pain during activity was significantly decreased in 2016 and 2017 subgroups ( P<0. 05 or 0. 01) , and the incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly increased in 2017 subgroup ( P<0. 05) . Compared with 2016 subgroup, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly increased in 2017 subgroup (P<0. 05). Conclusion Intelligentized PCA management can improve the efficacy of PCA, mitigates the occurrence of adverse reac-tions and raise the quality of postoperative analgesia in the patients.