ABSTRACT
Background: Kissing Balloon Inflation (KBI) technique was the first technique for percutaneous intervention in bifurcation lesions. It's the standard strategy in the two-stent procedure. Its benefit in one-stent approach remains uncertain. Several trials comparing KBI strategy with the No-KBI strategy in one-stent technique did not show any advantages in the clinical outcome. Clinical outcome and the follow up of ischemic symptoms is a useful method to compare the effectiveness of both strategies.Aims: To study the short-term clinical outcome (3and 6 months) of provisional versus routine kissing‑balloon technique after main vessel stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions.Patients and Methods: The study included sixty consecutive patients. They were randomized to receive different side branch (SB) intervention strategies: group I (provisional final kissing balloon inflation group -PFKBI) (FKBI only when SB Flow less than TIMI 3) and group II (routine final kissing balloon inflation group –RFKBI).Results: 1-Dissection of side branchand conversion to two stent strategy was significantly higher in PFKBI group (14,3%) than in RFKBI group (0) 2-The amount of dye, total procedure time and time of admission was significantly higher in RFKBI group. 3-Chest pain immediately after the procedure was significantly higher in PFKBI group while at 3 and 6 months follow up no significant difference between both groups was noticed. 4-MACE, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent thrombosis were similar between both groups at 3 and 6 months.Conclusions: Main vessel stenting with and without final kissing balloon dilatation was associated with favorable and similar 3 and 6-month clinical outcomes
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of jailed-balloon technique(JBT) in the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions.Methods From March 2013 to October 2014,a total of 71 patients who received coronary angiography,were diagnosed as true coronary bifurcation lesions and then underwentpercutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in the Department of Cardiology of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University was divided into group A(jailed balloon side branch protection group,28 cases) and group B(traditional side branch protection group,43 cases).The perioperative complications,X-ray exposure time,the number of intervention supplies,the total expenses,the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events and other indicators between the groups were compared,and the feasibility of JBT was evaluated.Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in perioperative complications(P＞0.05),postoperative adverse cardiovascular events and restenosis rate of side branch after angiography(P＞ 0.05),but the PCI related indicators (including the balloon use number,PCI operation time,the amount of X-ray exposure,wire number,the amount of contrast agent and operation cost) in group A were significantly lower than those in group B(P＜0.05).Conclusion JBT applied in the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions can reduce the operative time,X-ray irradiation time and related medical expenses.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the protective effect of a small balloon on bifurcation lesions by applying a single stent treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions strategy. Methods Fifty patients with coronary bifurcation lesions were randomly divided into A group and B group( 25 cases for each group ). Patients in A group were treated with the pre-entry protection branch guide wire to complete the main branch balloon pre-dilation,stenting,while in B group were treated with the set aside the branches of a small balloon. The information of main branch balloon pre-dilation,stenting were recorded. The blood flow slowed down,the incidence of side branch occlusion or stent placement,and the incidence of postoperative 24 h troponin I( cTnI) levels were measured. Results Nine cases(36%)in A group occurred lower branch blood flow,which due to 4 cases(16% )with significantly narrow branch stenting,2 cases(8%)with complete occlusion. There were only 2 cases(8%)with decrease branching blood flow in B group,and the difference was significant(P=0. 041, 0. 022). The cases with higher cTnI after 24 h in A group were 11( 39%),significantly higher in group B (3(12 %);P =0. 027 ). Conclusion Compared with the traditional protection guidewire,the approach of setting aside a small balloon to protect important branch can effectively prevent important branch occlusion, branch involvement due to lower incidence of myocardial infarction.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate long-term outcome of simultaneous kissing sirolimus-eluting stent (SKS) technique versus single sirolimus-eluting stent (SSS) technique for percutaneous treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions in large-size vessels.Methods This randomized study assigned 190 patients with a coronary bifurcation lesion to simultaneous kissing stenting (SKS) in both main and side branches and 190 patients to main vessel stenting only (SSS).The endpoints included restenosis,death,non-fatal myocardial infarction,target-lesion revascularization (TLR),stent thrombosis,success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the operation duration.Results During 1-year follow-up,the SKS group and the SSS group had similar incidences of overall re stenosis [30 ( 15.8 ％ ) vs.24 ( 15.2 ％ ),x2=0.000,P＜0.05],mainbranch restenosis [20 ( 10.5％ ) vs.16 ( 10.1％ ),x2=0.003,P ＞ 0.05];side-branch restenosis [13 ( 6.8％ )vs.23 ( 14.6％ );x2=4.73,P＜0.05];death [2 ( 1.1％ ) vs.1 ( 0.6％ ),x2=0.026,P ＞ 0.05],non-fatal myocardial infarction [4 (2.1％ ) vs.2 ( 1.3％ ),x2=0.034,P ＞ 0.05],TLR [23 ( 12.1％ ) vs.20 ( 12.7％ ),x2=0.000,P ＞ 0.05] and stent thrombosis [4 (2.1％ ) vs.2 ( 1.3 ％ ),x2=0.034,P ＞ 0.05] and a shorter operation duration[(20 ± 8) min vs.(45 ± 9) min,t=1.98,P＜0.05] than the SSS group.Conclusion For true coronary bifurcation lesions in large-size vessels,SKS and SSS have similar long-term outcomes.The SKS group has a higher success rate of PCI and shorter operation duration.