ABSTRACT
Liver retransplantation is the final option for graft failure after liver transplantation. The interval between the first and second liver transplantation will directly affect surgical indications, technical difficulties and treatment outcomes of adult liver retransplantation. Previous studies have shown that the overall survival of liver allografts and recipients after liver retransplantation is significantly lower than that after the first liver transplantation. However, with comprehensive progress in organ preservation methods, anesthesia management concepts, intensive care strategies, surgical techniques and new immunosuppressive drugs, clinical efficacy of adult liver retransplantation has been significantly improved. In this article, the changes of indications, timing of operation, long-term efficacy and its influencing factors, technical difficulties, selection of immunosuppressive regimens and the implementation of living donor liver retransplantation were reviewed, and the achievements, challenges and potential solutions of adult liver retransplantation were summarized, aiming to provide reference for enhancing clinical efficacy of adult liver retransplantation.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background Deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is the first choice, but living donor transplantation (LDLT) is an alternative to be considered in special situations, such as lack of donated organs and emergencies. So far, there is no consensus on which transplantation method provides better survival and fewer complications, which is still an open point for discussion. Methods This meta-analysis compared the 1, 3, and 5-year patient and graft survival rates of LDLT and DDLT. We included studies published from April-2009 to June-2021 and adopted the generic model of the inverse of variance for the random effect of hazard ratios. The adequacy of the studies was determined using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale — NOS (WELLS). Results For patient survival analysis, we included a total of 32,258 subjects. We found a statistically significant better survival for the LDLT group at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively: 1.35 HR (95%CI 1.10—1.66, P=0.005), 1.26 HR (95%CI 1.09—1.46, P=0.002) and 1.27 HR (95%CI 1.09—1.48, P=0.002). Our meta-analysis evaluated a total of 21,276 grafts. In the overall analysis, the 1-year survival was improved in favor of the LDLT group (1.36 HR, 95%CI 1.16—1.60, P<0.0001), while the 3-year survival (1.13 HR, 95%CI 0.96—1.33, P<0.13), and 5 (0.99 HR, 95%CI 0.74—1.33, P<0.96), did not differ significantly. Conclusion This metanalysis detected a statistically significant greater 1-, 3- and 5-years patient survival favoring LDLT compared to DDLT as well as a statistically significant difference better 1-year graft survival favoring the LDLT group.
RESUMO Contexto O transplante de fígado com doador falecido é a primeira escolha, mas o transplante de doador vivo é uma alternativa a ser considerada em situações especiais, como falta de órgãos doados e emergências. Até o momento, não há consenso sobre qual método de transplante proporciona melhor sobrevida e menos complicações, sendo, ainda, um ponto em aberto para discussão. Métodos Esta meta-análise comparou as taxas de sobrevida de pacientes e enxertos de 1, 3 e 5 anos de transplante de doador vivo e transplante de fígado com doador falecido. Incluímos estudos publicados de abril de 2009 a junho de 2021 e adotamos o modelo genérico do inverso da variância para o efeito aleatório das razões de risco. A adequação dos estudos foi determinada por meio da Escala de Newcastle-Ottawa — NOS (WELLS). Resultados Para análise de sobrevida do paciente, incluímos um total de 32.258 indivíduos. Encontramos uma melhor sobrevida estatisticamente significativa para o grupo de transplante de fígado de doador vivo em 1, 3 e 5 anos, respectivamente: 1,35 HR (IC95% 1,10—1,66, P=0,005), 1,26 HR (IC95% 1,09—1,46, P=0,002) e 1,27 HR (IC95% 1,09—1,48, P=0,002). Nossa meta-análise avaliou um total de 21.276 enxertos. Na análise geral, a sobrevida em 1 ano foi melhorada em favor do grupo de transplante de doador vivo (1,36 HR, IC95% 1,16—1,60, P<0,0001), enquanto a sobrevida em 3 anos (1,13 HR, IC95% 0,96—1,33, P<0,13) e 5 (0,99 HR, IC95% 0,74—1,33, P<0,96), não diferiram significativamente. Conclusão Esta meta-análise detectou uma sobrevida estatisticamente significativa maior do paciente em 1, 3 e 5 anos favorecendo o transplante de doador vivo em comparação com o transplante de fígado com doador falecido, bem como uma diferença estatisticamente significativa melhor na sobrevida do enxerto em 1 ano favorecendo o grupo de transplante de doador vivo.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of liver transplantation for acute liver failure (ALF) in children. Methods Clinical data of 15 children with ALF who underwent liver transplantation were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The proportion of ALF among children undergoing liver transplantation during the same period was calculated. The characteristics, postoperative complications and clinical prognosis of ALF children receiving liver transplantation were analyzed. Results In the same period, the proportion of ALF was 2.0% (15/743) among pediatric recipients undergoing liver transplantation. All 15 children had acute onset of ALF, and most of them were accompanied by fever, diarrhea and progressive yellowing of skin and sclera. Thirteen children were complicated with hepatic encephalopathy before operation (6 cases of stage Ⅳ hepatic encephalopathy), and two children were complicated with myelosuppression and granulocytopenia before liver transplantation. Ten children underwent living donor liver transplantation with relative donor liver, 4 received liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death (DCD), and 1 underwent Domino donor-auxiliary liver transplantation. Of 15 children, 12 recipients had the same blood type with their donors, 1 recipient had compatible blood type with the donor and 2 cases had different blood type with their donors. Among 15 children, 10 cases developed postoperative complications. Postoperative cerebral edema occurred in 5 cases, of whom 4 cases died of diffuse cerebral edema, and the remaining case was in a persistent vegetative state (eyes-open coma). Postoperative cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was seen in 5 cases. Two children presented with aplastic anemia and survived after bone marrow transplantation, 1 case died of CMV hepatitis and viral encephalitis, and 2 cases died of diffuse brain edema. One child developed graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after liver transplantation, and died of septic shock after bone marrow transplantation. Nine children survived and obtained favorable liver function during postoperative follow-up. Conclusions Liver transplantation is an efficacious treatment for ALF in children, which may enhance the survival rate. Brain edema is the main cause of death in ALF children following liver transplantation, and treatment such as lowering intracranial pressure, improving brain metabolism and blood purification should be actively performed. Liver transplantation should be promptly performed prior to the incidence of irreversible neurological damage in ALF children, which might prolong the survival and enhance long-term prognosis.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the risk factors of biliary complications(BCS)after pediatric living donor liver transplantation(LDLT).Methods:From January 2016 to December 2020, retrospective review of clinical data was performed for 681 children aged <18 years undergoing LDLT.There were 324 boys and 357 girls with a median age of 7.4 months and a median weight of 7.0 kg.Among 61 BCS patients(9.0%), there were biliary stricture(n=34, 5.0%), bile leakage(n=21, 3.1%)and bile leakage combined with biliary stricture(n=6, 0.9%). According to the absence or presence of BCS after LT, the recipients were divided into two groups of BCS(n=61)and non-BCS(n=620). The incidence and risk factors of BCS were analyzed.T-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Chi square or Fisher exact test was employed for univariate statistical analysis and Logistic regression for multivariate statistical analysis.Results:The median follow-up period was 35.5 months.Univariate analysis revealed statistically significant inter-group differences( P=0.005, 0.046, 0.009, 0.011, 0.024, 0.023, 0.004, 0.038, 0.002, 0.029, 0.023, 0.002, 0.011)in donor age[(31.4±5.7)vs.(34.3±7.5)years], time of anhepatic phase[43(37.0, 53.0)vs.47(38.8, 56.0)min], time from portal vein opening to hepatic artery opening[35(30.0, 41.0)vs. 38(30.8, 47.8)min], type of perfusion fluid, number of donor bile ducts, intestinal loop length[40(30.0, 40.0)vs.40(25.0, 40.0)cm], mode of biliary reconstruction, whether or not placing a support tube, incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis[1.6%(10/620)vs.9.8%(6/61)], incidence of abdominal infection[4.5%(28/620)vs.11.5%(7/61)], incidence of cytomegalovirus(CMV)infection[55.3%(343/620)vs.70.5%(43/61)], incidence of portal vein thrombosis[1.1%(7/620)vs.8.2%(5/61)]and incidence of pulmonary infection[19.0%(118/620)vs.32.8%(20/61)]. Multivariate analysis indicated that independent risk factors of BCS included donor age( P=0.023), number of donor bile ducts( P=0.017), time from portal vein opening to hepatic artery opening( P=0.010), hepatic artery thrombosis( P=0.004), abdominal infection( P=0.019), CMV infection( P=0.022), portal vein thrombosis( P=0.003), pulmonary infection( P=0.021)and short intestinal loop length( P=0.012). Conclusions:Biliary complications are common after pediatric LDLT.Independent risk factors are donor age, number of donor bile ducts, time from portal vein opening to hepatic artery opening, hepatic artery thrombosis, abdominal infection, CMV infection, portal vein thrombosis, pulmonary infection and short length of intestinal loop.
ABSTRACT
Background: Diarrhea is a frequent but overlooked complication of living liver donation. Thus, this retrospective study aimed to report the natural course of diarrhea and examined predictors of persistent diarrhea after living donor hepatectomy.Methods: We enrolled 79 donors who underwent living donor hepatectomy between 2010 and 2015 at a single medical center and had diarrhea symptoms after hepatectomy. The Chinese version of the gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) was applied to evaluate the effect of diarrhea on quality of life.Results: The onset of diarrhea was post-donation 1.1±0.3 months. According to their duration of diarrhea, donors were further classified into two groups: the healed and the persistent diarrhea group, the ratio was 36 to 43 (45.6% versus 54.4%). A donor who followed a low-fat diet had a protective effect on persistent diarrhea (odds ratio [OR] =0.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.66). Compared to healed diarrhea donors, donors with persistent diarrhea had lower GIQLI scores in the domains of physical (2.3 versus 1.9) and social functions (2.5 versus 2.3). Receiver operating characteristic curves for the duration of diarrhea after liver donation indicated that a donor was likely to develop a persistent diarrhea status if the duration of the diarrhea reached 12.5 months.Conclusions: A donor not following a low-fat diet can be independently predictive for persistent diarrhea after living donor hepatectomy. Besides, a donor with persistent diarrhea after hepatectomy is more likely to report lower GIQLI scores in physical and social functions.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence and development of de novo malignancy (DNM) after liver transplantation (LT) are the major causes of late recipient death.METHODS: We analyzed the incidence of extrahepatic DNM following living donor LT according to the status of pretransplant hepatic malignancy. We selected 2,076 adult patients who underwent primary LDLT during 7 years from January 2010 to December 2016.RESULTS: The pretransplant hepatic malignancy group (n = 1,012) showed 45 cases (4.4%) of the following extrahepatic DNMs: posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in 10; lung cancer in 10; stomach cancer in 6; colorectal cancer in 5; urinary bladder cancer in 3; and other cancers in 11. The pretransplant no hepatic malignancy group (n = 1,064) showed 25 cases (2.3%) of the following extrahepatic DNMs: colorectal cancer in 3; stomach cancer in 3; leukemia in 3; lung cancer in 3; PTLD in 2; prostate cancer in 2; and other cancers in 9. Incidences of extrahepatic DNM in the pretransplant hepatic malignancy and no hepatic malignancy groups were as follows: 1.1% and 0.5% at 1 year, 3.2% and 2.0% at 3 years, 4.6% and 2.5% at 5 years, and 5.4% and 2.8% at 8 years, respectively (P = 0.006). Their overall patient survival rates were as follows: 97.3% and 97.2% at 1 year, 91.6% and 95.9% at 3 years, 89.8% and 95.4% at 5 years, and 89.2% and 95.4% at 8 years, respectively (P < 0.001). Pretransplant hepatic malignancy was the only significant risk factor for posttransplant extrahepatic DNM.CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that patients who had pretransplant hepatic malignancy be followed up more strictly because they have a potential risk of primary hepatic malignancy recurrence as well as a higher risk of extrahepatic DNM than patients without pretransplant hepatic malignancy.
ABSTRACT
Objective To establish a modified dual liver transplantation rat model. Methods Based on the classic donor Y-shaped double iliac vein recanalization of bilateral liver grafts and portal vein and bile duct of the recipients, the dual liver transplantation rat model was modified by increasing the rat body mass, increasing the right lower lobe of the right graft, appropriate bile duct length, trimming Y-shaped blood vessels, and "triangular" anastomosis. The operation time, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time and anhepatic phase of dual liver transplantation were recorded. The incidence of postoperative complications of the recipients was observed. The survival rates of the recipients at postoperative 7 and 30 d were calculated. Results The operation time of dual liver transplantation in rat was (114±7) min, the cold ischemia time was (36±3) min, the warm ischemia time was (9.7±1.6) min, and the anhepatic phase was (19.9±2.2) min, respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications in the recipient rats was 31% (5/16) including 2 cases of peritoneal effusion, 1 case of hemorrhage, 1 case of bile leakage and 1 case of respiratory obstruction. The postoperative 7- and 30-d survival rates of the recipient rats were 81%(13/16)、56%(9/16), respectively. Conclusions The modified technique can establish a stable dual liver transplantation rat model, which deserves widespread application.
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics, pathogenic causes and therapeutic experience of right diaphragmatic hernia after pediatric living donor liver transplantation. Methods Clinical data of 3 recipients with right diaphragmatic hernia after pediatric living donor liver transplantation were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical characteristics, diagnosis and treatment process and therapeutic experience were analyzed and summarized. Results The primary diseases of 3 children with diaphragmatic hernia after living donor liver transplantation were biliary atresia. The diaphragmatic hernia occurred at 4-6 months after liver transplantation. The contents of diaphragmatic hernia included the intraperitoneal and interperitoneal tissues and organs. Diaphragmatic defects were all located in the posterior medial area of the right diaphragm. The primary stage intermittently suturing repair was performed during intraoperative period. No diaphragmatic hernia recurred during long-term follow-up. Conclusions The clinical manifestations of right diaphragmatic hernia after pediatric living donor liver transplantation are diverse. The risk factors include malnutrition, low body weight, surgical trauma, chemical erosion caused by bile leakage, focal infection and pleural-peritoneal pressure gradient, etc. Surgical intervention is the preferred treatment strategy for diaphragmatic hernia after liver transplantation.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the difference of clinical efficacy between surgical magnifying glass and surgical microscope assisted hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods Clinical data of 272 donors and recipients undergoing LDLT were retrospectively analyzed. According to different patterns of hepatic artery reconstruction, all recipients were divided into the magnifying glass group (n=189) and microscope group (n=83). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hepatic artery reconstruction site, diameter of anastomosis, incidence of postoperative complications and survival rate of recipients were statistically compared between two groups. Results Compared with the microscope group, the operation time, hepatic artery reconstruction time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly less in the magnifying glass group (all P < 0.001). The most common site of hepatic artery reconstruction was the right hepatic artery in two groups, and the diameter of anastomosis was (2.1±0.9) mm in the magnifying glass group and (2.1±0.8) mm in the microscope group, with no statistical significance between two groups (P > 0.05). The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates of recipients in the magnifying glass group were 88%, 86% and 85%, which did not significantly differ from 89%, 87% and 86% in the microscope group (all P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications did not significantly differ between two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusions The efficacy and safety of hepatic artery reconstruction in LDLT under surgical magnifying glass are equivalent to those under surgical microscope, with less operation workload and intraoperative blood loss. For experienced transplantation surgeons, it is recommended to perform hepatic artery reconstruction assisted by surgical magnifying glass.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Donor safety is the most important problem of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Although laparoscopic liver resection has gained popularity with increased surgical experience and the development of laparoscopes and specialized instruments, a totally laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy (LDRH) technique has not been investigated for efficacy and feasibility. We describe the experiences and outcomes associated with LDRH in adult-to-adult LDLT in order to assess the safety of the totally laparoscopic technique in donors. METHODS: Between May 2016 and July 2017, we performed hepatectomies in 22 living donors using a totally laparoscopic approach. Among them, 20 donors underwent LDRH. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records to ascertain donor safety and the reproducibility of LDRH; intra-operative and post-operative results including complications were demonstrated after performing LDRH. RESULTS: The median donor age was 29 years old and the median body mass index was 22.6 kg/m2. The actual graft weight was 710 g and graft weight/body weight (GRWR) was 1.125. No donors required blood transfusion, conversion to open surgery, or reoperation. The postoperative mortality was nil and postoperative complications were identified in two donors. One had fluid collection in the supra-pubic incision site for graft retrieval and the second had a minor bile leakage from the cutting edge of the right hepatic duct stump. All the liver function tests returned to normal ranges within one month. CONCLUSION: LDRH is a feasible operation owing to low blood loss and few complications. However, LDRH can be initially attempted after attaining sufficient experience in laparoscopic hepatectomy and LDLT techniques.
Subject(s)
Humans , Bile , Blood Transfusion , Body Mass Index , Conversion to Open Surgery , Hepatectomy , Hepatic Duct, Common , Laparoscopes , Liver , Liver Function Tests , Liver Transplantation , Living Donors , Medical Records , Mortality , Postoperative Complications , Reference Values , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Tissue Donors , TransplantsABSTRACT
Shortage of donors is a major obstacle for liver transplantation.Lee innovated dual graft living donor liver transplantation in 2001,obtained graft from two donors,and it was conducted in various parts of the world.At present,South Korea has the biggest numbers in operation,China,Japan,and Germany.Turkey,Romania,and other countries are relatively less;current clinical liver donor liver transplantation is mainly based on single graft living donor liver transplantation,and in some complicated cases,single graft liver transplantation cannot be completed due to various factors,at this situation dual grafts living donor liver transplantation can complete the treatment.Although dual donor liver transplantation can only be carried out in a few areas due to complex surgical procedures,it can enrich the treatment of liver transplantation and promotes the development of liver transplantation.
ABSTRACT
Background@#Although a number of technical problems and donor safety issues associated with living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have been resolved, some initial clinical studies showed an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence in LDLT. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess differences in tumor recurrence between LDLT and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT).@*Methods@#After systematic retrievals of studies about LDLT and DDLT for HCC, articles were selected with a rationale of emphasizing inter-group comparability. Results from multivariate analyses were combined and discussed together with univariate analyses. In subgroup analysis, the impact of organ allocation policy was taken into consideration.@*Results@#Seven articles were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, a salient result that emerged from the seven studies was a significant increased risk of HCC recurrence in the LDLT group than in the DDLT group (P = 0.01). The most significant increase in hazard ratio was found in studies where organs tended to be allocated to non-tumor patients.@*Conclusions@#An increased risk for HCC recurrence in LDLT as compared with DDLT patients was found. The relatively shorter preoperative observation windows in LDLT may lead to fewer cases of HCC with invasive features being screened out, which may provide a possible explanation for the high rates of HCC recurrence.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To understand the psychological experience of the pediatric living donor liver transplantation who is the child`s parent, identify the problems and gains that donors face in the event of donor liver, help donors to solve their difficulties to promote early recovery of donors and children, and help potential donors better understand the surgical.@*Methods@#The phenomenological methodology in qualitative research was used in the study, and the Colaizzi 7-step data analysis method was used for analysis the interview recording.@*Results@#Total of four themes are summarized. Preoperative psychological path: excitement, impatience, anxiety. Postperative growth: grateful, regain hope, hard work and proactive. Postnatal negative emotions: fear and jealousy. Family and social support.@*Conclusion@#Medical staff should strengthen psychological care and health education, use narrative care and other methods to mobilize the donor′s positive psychological experience, while providing perioperative quality care, strengthen social and family support, and help donors to restore physical and mental health.
ABSTRACT
Objective To understand the psychological experience of the pediatric living donor liver transplantation who is the child`s parent, identify the problems and gains that donors face in the event of donor liver, help donors to solve their difficulties to promote early recovery of donors and children, and help potential donors better understand the surgical. Methods The phenomenological methodology in qualitative research was used in the study, and the Colaizzi 7-step data analysis method was used for analysis the interview recording. Results Total of four themes are summarized. Preoperative psychological path: excitement, impatience, anxiety. Postperative growth: grateful, regain hope, hard work and proactive. Postnatal negative emotions: fear and jealousy. Family and social support. Conclusion Medical staff should strengthen psychological care and health education, use narrative care and other methods to mobilize the donor′s positive psychological experience, while providing perioperative quality care, strengthen social and family support, and help donors to restore physical and mental health.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The present study developed formulas for estimation of standard liver volume (SLV) with high accuracy for the Korean population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SLV estimation formulas were established using gender-balanced and gender-unbalanced measurements of anthropometric variables, body composition variables, and abdominal geometry of healthy Koreans (n=790). Total liver volume excluding blood volume, was measured based on CT volumetry. RESULTS: SLV estimation formulas as preferred in various conditions of data availability were suggested in the present study. The suggested SLV estimation formulas in the present study were found superior to existing formulas, with an increased accuracy of 4.0–217.5 mL for absolute error and 0.2–18.7% for percentage of absolute error. CONCLUSION: SLV estimation formulas using gender-balanced measurements showed better performance than those using gender-unbalanced measurements. Inclusion of body composition and abdominal geometry variables contributed to improved performance of SLV estimation.
Subject(s)
Blood Volume , Body Composition , LiverABSTRACT
Clinical outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have not been established in terms of HCC recurrence and MM deterioration after LDLT. A 51-year-old man with chronic hepatitis B was diagnosed with HCC and MM. Since the patient also had decompensated liver cirrhosis (LC), he underwent LDLT prior to autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) to prevent fulminant hepatitis due to HBV reactivation. The patient received Epstein-Barr virus prophylaxis and a triple immunosuppressive regimen of tacrolimus, everolimus, and steroid after LDLT. Autologous PBSCT was performed 7 months after LDLT. He showed a complete response to treatment of MM without post-LT complications or HCC recurrence. In conclusion, LDLT could be adapted for treatment of MM patients with combined HCC and decompensated LC because it is an effective strategy of preventing HBV reactivation and HCC recurrence after induction therapy of MM.
Subject(s)
Humans , Middle Aged , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Everolimus , Hepatitis B, Chronic , Hepatitis , Herpesvirus 4, Human , Liver Cirrhosis , Liver Transplantation , Liver , Living Donors , Multiple Myeloma , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Recurrence , TacrolimusABSTRACT
Intraoperative hypothermia occurs frequently, but hyperthermia is relatively rare during general anesthesia. We experienced a case of hyperthermia during living donor liver transplantation that appeared to be significantly associated with biliary obstruction. A 65-year-old male patient was diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and living donor liver transplantation was planned after confirmation of no metastasis via intraoperative frozen biopsy. Following resection of a segment of common bile duct for frozen biopsy, the surgeon clamped the common bile duct, and the patient's body temperature increased gradually to 39.5°C. As the congested bile was drained, the body temperature decreased to the normal range. This case report suggests that when a patient develops unexplained hyperthermia during hepatobiliary surgery or in a chance of biliary obstruction, clinicians should consider bile congestion as a possible reason for hyperthermia.
Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Male , Anesthesia, General , Bile , Biopsy , Body Temperature , Cholangiocarcinoma , Common Bile Duct , Estrogens, Conjugated (USP) , Fever , Hypothermia , Liver Transplantation , Liver , Living Donors , Neoplasm Metastasis , Reference ValuesABSTRACT
Objective@#To assess application of reconstruction of retrohepatic inferior vena cava using artificial blood vessel in right lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond Milan Criteria.@*Methods@#The clinical data of 9 HCC patients who underwent right lobe liver transplantation after reconstruction of retrohepatic inferior vena cava using artificial blood vessel between June 2015 and Nov 2016 at Liver Transplantation Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. The liver of the patients was removed with retrohepatic inferior vena cava, and then the right donor graft was implanted by conventional orthotopic liver transplantation.@*Results@#All 9 liver transplantations were performed successfully. The time of reconstruction of hepatic venous outflow of the donor graft was (22.6±3.0) min, anhepatic time was (45.0±7.1) min, and total operation time was (321.9±52.5) min. All patients recovered uneventfully, ICU and hospital stay day were (1.2±0.4) days and (18.4±3.0) days. 2 patients suffered from thrombosis of artificial blood vessel, one recovered after conservative treatment and another was treated by placement of vein stent. No abdominal/pulmonary infection and non-artificial blood vascular complications were found, and none died in perioperative period. Postoperative pathological results showed that all patients were hepatocellular carcinomas and vascular tumor thrombosis was found in 5 cases. All patients were follow up, 1 patient died of pulmonary and brain metastasis 10 months after operation. One patient survived with local recurrence of tumor in liver. The other patients had no tumor recurrence and metastasis.@*Conclusion@#Replacement of retrohepatic inferior vena cava using artificial blood vessel in right lobe living donor liver transplantation is safe and feasible in the treatment of HCC beyond Milan Criteria, and might improve the resection rate of diseased liver and the prognosis of HCC patients after living donor liver transplantation.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>Background:</b>Although many previous studies have confirmed that perioperative blood transfusion is associated with poor outcomes after liver transplantation (LT), few studies described the influence of single-donor platelet apheresis transfusion in living donor LT (LDLT). This study aimed to assess the effect of blood products on outcomes for LDLT recipients, focusing on apheresis platelets.</p><p><b>Methods:</b>This retrospective study included 126 recipients who underwent their first adult-to-adult LDLT. Twenty-four variables including consumption of blood products of 126 LDLT recipients were assessed for their link to short-term outcomes and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and the log-rank test were used for recipient survival analysis. A multivariate Cox proportional-hazard model and a propensity score analysis were applied to adjust confounders after potential risk factors were identified by a univariate Cox analysis.</p><p><b>Results</b>Patients who received apheresis platelet transfusion had a lower 90-day cumulative survival (78.9% vs. 94.2%, P = 0.009), but had no significant difference in overall survival in the Cox model, compared with those without apheresis platelet transfusion. Units of apheresis platelet transfusion (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.103, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.720-5.600, P < 0.001) and preoperative platelet count (HR = 0.170, 95% CI: 0.040-0.730, P = 0.017) impacted 90-day survival independently. Multivariate Cox regression analysis also found that units of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (HR = 1.036, 95% CI: 1.006-1.067, P = 0.018), recipient's age (HR = 1.045, 95% CI: 1.005-1.086, P = 0.025), and ABO blood group comparison (HR = 2.990, 95% CI: 1.341-6.669, P = 0.007) were independent risk factors for overall survival after LDLT.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b>This study suggested that apheresis platelets were only associated with early mortality but had no impact on overall survival in LDLT. Units of RBC, recipient's age, and ABO group comparison were independent predictors of long-term outcomes.</p>
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the relationship between CYP3A5 gene polymorphism and tacrolimus concentration/dose ratio in children living donor liver transplantation and the correlation with clinical efficacy,for the relatives living donor liver transplantation in children tacrolimus individualized medication providing reference indicators.Methods Peripheral blood samples were collected from children with relatives living donor liver transplantation in the center of liver transplantation,the genotype of CYP3A5 was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/pyrophosphate sequencing,The dosage of tacrolimus and blood concentration,liver and kidney function and other related indicators were measured within 3 months after operation According to genotypes,the children can be divided into gene expression group (CYP3A5 *1/*1 and CYP3A5 *1/*3) and non-expression group (CYP3A5*3/*3).The drug concentration (C0),tacrolimus dose / body weight (D/W) ratio,drug concentration/dose (C0/D) ratio of each genotype at 1 day,3 d,5 d,7 d,14 d,28 d,2 months and 3 months after administration and the genotype at the time point on liver and kidney function was carried out statistics.Results Among the 80 cases,36 cases (45.0%) were CYP3A5*3/*3,37 cases (46.2%) were CYP3A5*1/*3,7 cases (8.8%) were CYP3A5*1/*1.CYP3A5 gene expression group reached a therapeutic concentration range (C0 > 8 μg/L) than the gene non-expression group takes longer time.There was no significant difference in CYP3A5 gene expression group between the non-expression group on the initial dose (P> 0.05);CYP3A5 gene expression group than the non-expression group,tacrolimus C0 within 1 month after operation were statistically significant.CYP3A5 gene expression group than the non-expression group,tacrolimus D/ W in addition to the first day after surgery,other time points were statistically significant (P<0.05).CYP3A5 gene expression group than the non-expression group,C0/D at the above time points were statistically significant (P<0.05);There were no significant differences in liver and kidney function between the two genotypes (P > 0.05),but there was significant difference in the alkaline phosphatase.Conclusion CYP3A5 gene expression in children than non-expression group of children need higher doses to reach the therapeutic drug concentration;CYP3A5 gene polymorphism had significant effects on early tacrolimus C0,D/W and C0/D values;CYP3A5 gene polymorphism is instructive for the administration of tacrolimus in children with living donor liver transplantation,CYP3A5 gene type tests should be regular,improve efficacy and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.