ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical outcome of kidney transplantation from donation after brain death (DBD) donors complicated with acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods Clinical data of 216 DBD donors were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into the AKI group (n=69) and control group (n=147) according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. Donors in the AKI group were further divided into the KDIGO stage 1 and stage 2-3 subgroups. One hundred and thirty-five recipients were assigned into the AKI group and 288 recipients in the control group. Postoperative recovery of renal function and clinical outcomes of the recipients were recorded. The risk factors of delayed graft function (DGF) were identified. Results The highest serum creatinine (Scr) level, Scr level before procurement, the highest blood sodium level and blood sodium level before procurement in the AKI group were higher than those in the control group. The application duration of vasopressors in the AKI group was longer than that in the control group. In the AKI group, the amount of fluid resuscitation within 48 h was higher, the HCO3− level at admission was lower, and the incidence of diabetes insipidus and hypotension was higher than those in the control group. The highest Scr level and the Scr level before procurement in KDIGO stage 2-3 donors were significantly higher than those in KDIGO stage 1 counterparts (all P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the incidence of DGF and acute rejection was higher, the proportion of continuous renal replacement therapy was higher, the Scr level within postoperative 90 d was higher, and the urine amount within postoperative 3 d was less than those of recipients in the AKI group. Compared with KDIGO stage 1 recipients, KDIGO stage 2-3 recipients had higher Scr levels at postoperative 3, 4, 5 and 15 d, and less urine amount at postoperative 2 d (all P<0.05). Univariate analysis showed that donor age, the highest Scr level, the highest blood sodium level and the amount of fluid resuscitation within 48 h were the risk factors for DGF in recipients after kidney transplantation. Multivariate analysis showed that donor age was the independent risk factor for DGF in recipients after kidney transplantation (all P<0.05). Conclusions For the application of DBD donors complicated with AKI, active organ maintenance should be performed to alleviate AKI. It exerts no effect upon graft function and survival rate at postoperative 6 months, which may achieve equivalent efficacy as non-AKI donors and may be used as a source of extended criteria donor kidneys.
ABSTRACT
Objective To summarize the clinical efficacy of renal transplantation from donors of donation after brain death (DBD) complicated with acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods Fifty-nine DBD donors successfully undergoing renal transplantation were recruited in this investigation. According to the Scr level upon admission of intensive care unit (ICU), DBD donors were divided into the AKI group (n=14) and control group (n=45). A total of 101 recipients were assigned into the AKI group (n=23) and control group (n=78) correspondingly. The organ donation conditions of 59 donors were summarized. Main parameters of the donors before organ procurement were statistically compared between two groups. Postoperative kidney function, hospitalization condition and clinical outcomes of the recipients were statistically compared between two groups. Results Among 59 donors, 14 cases (24%) suffered from AKI. Two donors received continuous renal replacement therapy during organ maintenance. Compared with the donors in the control group, the APACHE Ⅱ score of the donors was significantly higher (P<0.05), the incidence of central diabetes insipidus was considerably higher (P<0.01), the Scr levels at admission of ICU and before organ procurement were significantly higher (both P<0.01) and the amount of urine at 24 h before organ procurement was dramatically less in the AKI group (P<0.01).Compared with the recipients in the control group, the Scr levels at postoperative 2 and 3 d were significantly higher (both P<0.05), the length of hospital stay was considerably longer (P<0.01) and the hospitalization expanse was significantly higher in the AKI group (P<0.05). No statistical significance was observed in the postoperative delayed recovery of renal graft function, incidence of acute rejection, infection and rehabilitation dialysis in the recipients between two groups (all P>0.05). At 3 months after transplantation, the recipients in two groups were discharged and the graft survival rate was 100%. Conclusions For renal transplantation from DBD donors complicated with AKI, active measures should be taken to maintain the organ and relieve the AKI, which yields similar clinical efficacy to renal transplantation from non-AKI donors and widens the origin of kidney graft.