ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity of the thoracolumbar injury classification system (TLICS) when making treatment decisions in a group of thoracolumbar fracture patients. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Few studies have evaluated the validity of the TLICS in consecutively treated patients, although many have evaluated the application of the TLICS to thoracolumbar injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed among the 230 patients who were treated from 2003 to 2015 in our hospital for thoracolumbar injuries. Evaluations were made of clinical outcomes and radiologic results, and each case was analysed and scored according to the American Spinal Injury Association scale, the Magerl/AO classification, and the TLICS classification by 2 spinal surgeons. RESULTS: Of the 230 patients, 116 (50.4%) received conservative treatment and 114 (49.6%) received surgical treatment. Of the 116 patients who received conservative treatment, 112 (96.6%) were treated according to the TLICS guidelines. Conservative treatment failed for 2 of the 4 patients (1.7%) whose treatment did not correspond with TLICS, and they required surgical treatment. Of the 114 patients who underwent surgical treatment, in 87 (76.3%) the treatment corresponded to the TLICS guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The TLICS classification showed high validity for the conservative treatment of thoracolumbar injuries.
Subject(s)
Humans , Classification , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Injuries , Spine , SurgeonsABSTRACT
Background: The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the functional outcome of conservative treatment with early ambulation of dorso-lumbar spine fractures with no neurological deficit. Aims & Objective: The purpose of this prospective study was to identify the risk factors for dorso-lumbar spine injuries, and to assess the efficacy of non-operative treatment with early ambulation, and functional outcome of the patients. Material and Methods: From October 2008 to June 2010, 48 consecutive patients with single- level thoracolumbar spinal injury, with no neurological deficit were managed non-operatively. A custom-made thoracolumbosacral orthosis was worn by all patients for six months, and early ambulation was recommended. Patients were evaluated as per TLICS score, and if score was <=4 with no neurological deficit then, they were treated with conservative treatment and included in the study. The Denis Pain and Work Scale were used to assess the clinical outcome. The average follow-up period was 6.5 months (range, 4 to 11 months). Statistical analysis done by observational descriptive statistics using SPSS 19.0. Results: Radiological parameters, such as Cobb’s angle, showed loss of fracture reduction, which was not statistically significant. However, the functional outcome was satisfactory in 40 out of 48 patients, with no complications recorded on completion of treatment. Conclusion: Conservative treatment with early mobilization using TLS orthosis had good results in patients with TLICS score <4. We support the concept that TLICS is a reliable and easy-to-use classification for the conservative treatment and prognosis of thoracolumbar spinal fractures.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of TLICS classification in the thoracolumbar injuries, which had been evaluated in our hospital. It was compared with that of the older, McAfee classification and discussed for clinical validation. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Among the numerous literatures regarding the thoracolumbar injury, there is no consensus on the most useful classification, and there is nothing comparing the McAfee classification with the TLICS classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among the 230 patients that were treated with conservative care or operation from January 1, 2005 to January 1, 2010 in our hospital, 185 patients with initial CT and MRI images were assessed. Five orthopedic surgeons reviewed histories, plain film, CT and MRI of the 185 thoracolumbar injury cases, respectively. Each case was classified and scored according to the McAfee classification and the TLICS classification. The case assessment was recorded and the orthopedic surgeons repeated the assessment 1 month later. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were assessed by statistical analysis. The actual management of each case was compared with the treatment recommended by TLICS classification to calculate the validity of the indexes. RESULTS: Intraobserver and interobserver reliability in TLICS were higher than those in the McAfee classification. Agreement of the TLICS classification for treatment recommendation was 81.7%, comparing with the actual management of previous McAfee classification. Validity indexes were satisfactory in therapeutic decision making, especially specificity. CONCLUSIONS: TLICS classification has a relative high K-value, when compared with that of the McAfee classification for intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Through clinical studies, including prospective observational analysis, TLICS classification can be applied and adjusted more adequately.
Subject(s)
Humans , Consensus , Decision Making , Orthopedics , Retrospective Studies , Spinal InjuriesABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: A new classification system for throacolumbar spine injury, Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) was evaluated retrospectively. PURPOSE: To evaluate intrarater and interrater reliability of newly proposed TLICS schemes and to estimate validity of TLICS's final treatment recommendation. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Despite numerous literature about thoracolumbar spine injury classifications, there is no consensus regarding the optimal system. METHODS: Using plain radiographs, computed tomography scanning, magnetic resonance imaging, and medical records, 3 clssifiers, consisting of 2 spine surgeons and 1 senior orthopaedic surgery resident, reviewed 114 clinical thoracolumbar spine injury cases retrospectively to classify and calculate injury severity score according to TLICS. This process were repeated on 4 weeks intervals and the scores were then compared with type of treatment that patient ultimately received. RESULTS: The intrarater reliability of TLICS was substantial agreement on total score and injury morphology, almost perfect agreement on integrity of the posterior ligament complex (PLC) and neurologic status. The interrater reliability was substantial agreement on injury morphology and integrity of the PLC, moderate agreement on total score, almost perfect agreement on neurologic status. The TLICS schems exhibited satisfactory overall validity in terms of clinical decision making. CONCLUSIONS: The TLICS was demonstrated acceptable intrarater and interrater reliability and satisfactory validity in terms of treatment recommendation.
Subject(s)
Humans , Consensus , Decision Making , Injury Severity Score , Ligaments , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Medical Records , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , SpineABSTRACT
[Objective]To investigate the application of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity thoracolumbar injuty chassification and severityscdre(TLICS)score in spinal fracture caused by earthquake.[Method]Night-five patients with spinal fractures were treated in Chendu Army General Hospital and Chendu Air Force Hosptial by Wenchuan earthquake medical team from Chinese PLA General Hospital.There were 49 males and 46 females with mean age of 48.6 years.The general patient data,injury mechanism,and injury time were recorded.The different treatments were decided by the TLICS score.[Result]There were 107 vertebral fractures in the 95 patients,out of whom 76 patients were injured by building collapsed,and the other 19 by falling from buildings.TLICS score was more than 4 in 36 patients,4 points in 15 patients,less than 4 points in 44 patients.40 patients were treated with open operation,15 patients with vertebraplasty,and the other patients with conservative treatment.[Conclusion]The earthquake spinal fractures can be treated with different treatments based on the different TLICS scores.