Actualización en analgesia preventiva y analgesia multimodal / Update on preventive analgesia and multimodal analgesia

Una deficiente calidad del manejo del dolor post operatorio agudo genera aumento en la morbilidad perioperatoria, disminuye la calidad de vida del paciente, aumenta los reingresos hospitalarios y, finalmente, los costes en salud. La analgesia preventiva y multimodal son dos estrategias que han sido implementadas para tratar de optimizar el manejo del dolor. Si bien en la primera, la evidencia es favorable a su empleo, aún no existe un total consenso en esto. A su vez, la analgesia multimodal, al emplear diferentes fármacos y/o técnicas, ha logrado evidenciar de mejor manera su utilidad y los beneficios al implementarla como terapia. En este artículo, revisamos la evidencia que certifica y avala el uso de éstas. Finalmente, a nuestro parecer, lo más importante en el quehacer del clínico, es lograr individualizar la estrategia que usaremos en el manejo del dolor postoperatorio, adaptándonos a las necesidades y el contexto propio de cada uno de nuestros pacientes.

A poor quality of acute postoperative pain management generates an increase in perioperative morbidity, decreases the quality of life of the patient, increases hospital readmissions and finally, increases health costs. Preventive and multimodal analgesia are two strategies that are implemented to try to optimize pain management. Although in the first, the evidence is favorable to its use, there is still no total consensus. At the same time, multimodal analgesia, by using different drugs and/or techniques, has demonstrated, in a better way, its usefulness and benefits when implemented as a therapy. In this article, we review the evidence that certifies and supports the use of these techniques. Finally, in our opinion, the most important thing in the clinician's task is to be able to individualize the strategy that we will use in postoperative pain management, adapting to the needs and context of each one of our patients.

Impacto de la implementación de un protocolo de sedoanalgesia en una unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos / Impact of the implementation of a sedation and analgesia protocol in a pediatric intensive care unit

Introducción. La adecuada sedación y analgesia es fundamental en el tratamiento de pacientes que requieren asistencia ventilatoria mecánica (AVM). Se recomienda la utilización de protocolos y su monitoreo; son dispares los resultados reportados sobre adhesión e impacto. Objetivos. Evaluar el impacto de la implementación de un protocolo de sedoanalgesia sobre el uso de benzodiacepinas, opioides y evolución en la unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos (UCIP), en pacientes que requieren AVM mayor a 72 horas. Métodos. Estudio tipo antes-después, no controlado, en la UCIP de un hospital pediátrico. Se desarrolló en 3 etapas: preintervención de diagnóstico situacional (de abril a septiembre de 2019), intervención y posintervención de implementación del protocolo de sedoanalgesia, educación sobre uso y monitorización de adherencia y su impacto (de octubre de 2019 a octubre de 2021). Resultados. Ingresaron al estudio 99 y 92 pacientes en las etapas pre- y posintervención, respectivamente. Presentaron mayor gravedad, menor edad y peso en el período preintervención. En la comparación de grupos, luego de ajustar por gravedad y edad, en la etapa posintervención se reportó una reducción en los días de uso de opioides en infusión continua (6 ± 5,2 vs. 7,6 ± 5,8; p = 0,018) y los días de uso de benzodiacepinas en infusión continua (3,3 ± 3,5 vs. 7,6 ± 6,8; p = 0,001). No se observaron diferencias significativas en los días de AVM y en los días totales de uso de benzodiacepinas. Conclusión. La implementación de un protocolo de sedoanalgesia permitió reducir el uso de fármacos en infusión continua.

Introduction. Adequate sedation and analgesia is essential in the management of patients requiring mechanical ventilation (MV). The implementation of protocols and their monitoring is recommended; mixed results on adherence and impact have been reported. Objectives. To assess the impact of the implementation of a sedation and analgesia protocol on the use of benzodiazepines, opioids, and evolution in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in patients requiring MV for more than 72 hours. Methods. Before-and-after, uncontrolled study in the PICU of a children's hospital. The study was developed in 3 stages: pre-intervention for situational diagnosis (from April to September 2019), intervention, and post-intervention for implementation of a sedation and analgesia protocol, education on use, and monitoring of adherence and impact (from October 2019 to October 2021). Results. A total of 99 and 92 patients were included in the study in the pre- and post-intervention stages, respectively. Patients had a more severe condition, were younger, and had a lower weight in the preintervention period. After adjusting for severity and age, the group comparison in the post-intervention stage showed a reduction in days of continuous infusion of opioids (6 ± 5.2 versus 7.6­5.8, p = 0.018) and days of continuous infusion of benzodiazepines (3.3 ± 3.5 versus 7.6 ± 6.8, p = 0.001). No significant  differences were observed in days of MV and total days of benzodiazepine use. Conclusion. The implementation of a sedation and analgesia protocol resulted in a reduction in the use of continuous infusion of drugs.

Interferential Current Electrotherapy is More Effective Thanthan TENS VIF in Cancer Pain Management / Corrente Interferencial é Mais Efetiva para Alívio da Dor Oncológica que a TENS VIF

Cancer diagnosis is increasing rapidly worldwide and pain is a common feature reported by cancer patients. Therapeutical approach on cancer pain is complex where less invasive methods with little side effects have been sought. The aim of this study was to compare transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential current (IC) therapies effects on cancer pain. Double blind study with 81 cancer pain patients. Subjects were set up into two groups: one treated with TENS VIF (n=42) and other with IC (n=39). Age, gender, duration of pain, tumor site and histology, medications, treatments, Karnofsky score and clinical state were evaluated. Pain was measured by EMADOR and McGill scores. Electroanalgesia was performed for 30 minutes, the equipments used were Neurodyn III Ibramed® and Neurovector generation 2000 Ibramed®. Electrodes were placed where there was higher intensity of pain according to what was shown by the patient through EMADOR, and each one got only one electrotherapy session. Pain intensity was significantly reduced in both groups (p<0.001) soon after and until 6th hour post electrotherapy. IC group had better results at 4th, 5th (p<0.001) and 6th hour (p=0.022). McGill score in TENS VIF group was significant until 4th hour and in the IC group was highly significant in all evaluated times (p<0.001). Analgesic effect of TENS VIF and IC electrotherapy was clinically effective, however, IC did cause better results regarding analgesia duration.(AU)

O diagnóstico de câncer está aumentando rapidamente em todo o mundo e a dor é uma característica comum relatada por pacientes com câncer. A abordagem terapêutica da dor oncológica é complexa onde métodos menos invasivos e com poucos efeitos colaterais têm sido buscados. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os efeitos das terapias de estimulação elétrica nervosa transcutânea (TENS) e corrente interferencial (IC) na dor oncológica. Estudo duplo-cego com 81 pacientes com dor oncológica. Os indivíduos foram divididos em dois grupos: um tratado com TENS VIF (n=42) e outro com IC (n=39). Idade, sexo, duração da dor, local do tumor e histologia, medicamentos, tratamentos, pontuação de Karnofsky e estado clínico foram avaliados. A dor foi mensurada pelos escores EMADOR e McGill. A eletroanalgesia foi realizada por 30 minutos, os equipamentos utilizados foram Neurodyn III Ibramed® e Neurovector geração 2000 Ibramed®. Os eletrodos foram colocados onde havia maior intensidade de dor de acordo com o apresentado pelo paciente através da EMADOR. A intensidade da dor foi significativamente reduzida em ambos os grupos (p<0,001) logo após e até a 6ª hora pós-eletroterapia. O grupo CI teve melhores resultados na 4ª, 5ª (p<0,001) e 6ª hora (p=0,022). O escore de McGill no grupo TENS VIF foi significativo até a 4ª hora e no grupo IC foi altamente significativo em todos os tempos avaliados (p<0,001). O efeito analgésico da TENS VIF e da eletroterapia com IC foi clinicamente eficaz, porém a IC trouxe melhores resultados quanto à duração da analgesia.(AU)

Risk management and safety in the use of patient-controlled analgesia pumps: a scoping review / Gestão de risco e segurança no uso de bomba de analgesia controlada pelo paciente: revisão de escopo

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is effective in controlling pain, but has numerous associated risks, such as: hypotension, respiratory depression, seizures and excessive sedation. The promotion of patient safety aims to reduce the risk of unnecessary health injuries and, therefore, it is important to analyze the failures and risk factors present throughout the process proactively. Therefore, the aim of this study was to map the available evidence on the risks of adverse events associated with the PCA technique and patient safety actions. CONTENTS: This is a scoping review conducted according to the JBI methodology, whose research question was based on the PCC strategy. The source of information is open and the search occurred in three stages. The databases used were: Medline/Pubmed; LILACS; CINAHL/ EBSCOhost; CENTRAL; Portal Capes; SCOPUS; Web of Science; Google academic; Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations; Portal NICE; and Portal ISMP. The search strategy was divided into 3 stages: the first occurred in Medline and Cinahl to identify articles and index terms on the topic; the second used all keywords in all included databases; the third consisted of tracking searches in the reference lists of the included studies. The search resulted in 1,164 studies, of which 83 were selected based on the inclusion criteria: addressing the risks associated with the PCA pump or safety measures, hospital context, without restriction as to the type of study, language, and year. The studies are distributed in categories: previous diseases, profile of indications, types of opioids, types of pump and infusion, adverse effects, incidents without harm, stages of risk, and safety measures. CONCLUSION: This study made it possible to identify the risks of adverse events associated with the use of PCA in different stages and safety actions, demonstrating that when performed with appropriate patients, trained staff, safe devices, and correct prescription it provides a statistically significant improvement in pain relief, safely with advantages that conventional analgesia does not have.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A analgesia controlada pelo paciente (ACP) é eficaz no controle da dor, porém apresenta inúmeros riscos associados, tais como: hipotensão arterial, depressão respiratória, convulsões e sedação excessiva. A promoção da segurança do paciente visa reduzir o risco de lesões desnecessárias à saúde e, para tanto, é importante analisar as falhas e fatores de risco presentes em todo o processo de forma proativa. Portanto, o objetivo deste estudo foi mapear as evidências disponíveis sobre os riscos de eventos adversos associados à técnica de ACP e a ações de segurança do paciente. CONTEÚDO: Trata-se de uma revisão de escopo realizada segundo a metodologia Joanna Briggs Institute para Scoping Reviews, cuja questão de pesquisa se baseou na estratégia PCC (P: população; C: conceito; C: contexto). As bases de dados utilizadas foram: Medline/Pubmed, LILACS, CINAHL/EBSCOhost, CENTRAL, Portal Capes, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Google acadêmico, Biblioteca Digital Brasileira de Teses e Dissertações, Portal NICE, Portal ISMP. A estratégia de busca foi dividida em 3 etapas: a primeira ocorreu na Medline e Cinahl para identificar artigos e termos de índice sobre o tema; a segunda utilizou todas as palavras-chaves em todas as bases de dados incluídas; a terceira consistiu no rastreamento de pesquisas nas listas de referências dos estudos incluídos. A busca resultou em 1.164 estudos, dos quais 83 foram selecionados com base nos seguintes critérios de inclusão: abordagem dos riscos associados à bomba de ACP ou a medidas de segurança, contexto hospitalar, sem restrição quanto ao tipo de estudo, idioma e ano. Os achados sintetizados estão distribuídos em categorias: doenças prévias, perfil das indicações, tipos de opioides, tipos de bomba e de infusão, efeitos adversos, incidentes sem lesões, estágios de risco e medidas de segurança. CONCLUSÃO: Este estudo possibilitou identificar os riscos de eventos adversos associados ao uso da ACP em diferentes estágios e ações de segurança, demonstrando que quando realizada com pacientes adequados, com equipe treinada, dispositivos seguros e prescrição correta, fornece uma melhora estatisticamente significativa no alívio da dor, de forma segura e com vantagens que a analgesia convencional não possui.

Ultrasound Guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Using Either Bupivacaine Or Bupivacaine With Dexmedetomidine For Postoperative Analgesia In Patients With Femur Fractures.

Background: Femur fractures are extremely painful due to the lowest pain threshold of the periosteum among the deep somatic structures. Perioperative Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB), when administered using a local anesthetic agent, bupivacaine, can reduce morbidity by providing satisfactory pain relief. Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 agonist, is known to prolong the local anesthetic effects without causing any significant side effects. We compared analgesic duration of ultrasound guided FICB with bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia. A prospective, randomized, double blinded study was conducted on 50 patientsMaterials And Method: aged 18 to 65 years undergoing femur fracture surgeries. Patients were divided into 2 groups of 25 each. Both groups received USG guided FICB. Group A received 28 ml 0.25% bupivacaine and 2 ml normal saline (NS). Group B received 28 ml 0.25% bupivacaine and 30 mcg dexmedetomidine in NS. Pain scores were assessed every 5 minutes until 15 minutes post FICB, during positioning for subarachnoid block and every 2 hours until 24 hours post-operatively. Total duration of analgesia, cumulative analgesia requested in 24 hours, Ramsay sedation and patient satisfaction scores were recorded. Results: The mean duration of analgesia in Group A was 419.4 ± 115.35 minutes (95%CI: 374.2 – 464.6) and in Group B was 656.6 ± 137.99 minutes (95%CI: 602.5 –710.7), p <0.001. Mean VAS score during positioning for SAB in Group A was 1.60 ± 0.50 and in Group B was 0.96 ± 0.68. USG guided FICB with dexmedetomidine is superior inConclusion: providing prolonged post-operative analgesia in comparison to bupivacaine alone

Single-bolus dexmedetomidine in prevention of emergence delirium in pediatric ophthalmic surgeries: A randomized controlled trial

Purpose: Emergency delirium (ED), a common postoperative neurologic complication, causes behavioral disturbances leading to self?traumas and also has long?term adverse effects in children. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy of a single?bolus dose of dexmedetomidine in reducing the incidence of ED. Additionally, pain relief, number of patients who needed rescue analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse events were assessed. Methods: One hundred and one patients were randomly allocated into two groups: 50 patients received 15 mL of dexmedetomidine 0.4 ?g/kg (group D) and 51 patients received volume?matched normal saline (group C). Hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were monitored regularly throughout the procedure. ED was assessed with Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAEDS), and pain was measured using the modified Objective Pain Score (MOPS). Results: The incidences of ED and pain were higher in group C than group D (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Group D showed significant decrease in MOPS and PAEDS values at 5, 10, 15, and 20 min (P < 0.05), HR at 5 min (P < 0.0243), and SBP at 15 min (P < 0.0127). There was no significant difference in DBP between the two groups at any time point. The mean blood pressure (MBP) at 10 min was significantly less in group D than group C (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine 0.4 ?g/kg as a single bolus over 10 min immediately after intubation is effective for the prevention of ED and significantly reduces the need of rescue analgesia without compromising the hemodynamic parameters in children undergoing ophthalmic surgery.

The Effectiveness of Periarticular Anesthetic Infiltration in Postoperative Analgesia of Total Hip Arthroplasty / A eficácia da infiltração periarticular anestésica na analgesia pós-operatória de artroplastia total do quadril

Abstract Objective The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the periarticular hip infiltration technique in the postoperative period of total hip arthroplasty. Methods This is a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial in patients with femoral neck fractures or hip osteoarthritis submitted to a total hip arthroplasty at our institution. The periarticular infiltration technique consisted of the administration of an anesthetic (levobupivacaine) and a steroid (dexamethasone) agent in the nociceptor-rich tissues of the hip after orthopedic implants placement. The control group received an injection of 0.9% saline into the same tissues. Pain, range of motion, and use of opioid analgesic agents after 24 and 48hours of the procedure were evaluated, as well as the presence of adverse effects, time to resume walking, and total hospitalization time. Results The study evaluated 34 patients. The experimental group required fewer opioid agents between 24 and 48 hours. The reduction in pain scores was greater in the placebo group. Conclusion Periarticular anesthetic infiltration as a method of postoperative analgesia for total hip arthroplasty reduced the rates of opioid intake between 24 and 48hours. It provided no benefits regarding pain, mobility, length of stay, or complications.

Resumo Objetivo Este estudo tem como objetivo avaliar a eficácia da técnica de infiltração periarticular do quadril no pós-operatório de artroplastia total do quadril. Métodos Estudo clínico randomizado duplo-cego controlado. O estudo foi realizado nos pacientes com fratura de colo femoral ou osteoartrose de quadril, submetidos ao procedimento cirúrgico de artroplastia total do quadril em nossa instituição. A técnica de infiltração periarticular consistiu na aplicação da combinação de um anestésico (levobupivacaína) com um corticosteroide (dexametasona) nos tecidos ricos em nociceptores do quadril, após a colocação dos implantes ortopédicos. No grupo controle, foi realizada infiltração de soro fisiológico 0,9% nos mesmos tecidos. Após 24 e 48 horas do procedimento, foram avaliados os quesitos de dor, amplitude de movimentos, uso de analgésicos opióides, presença de efeitos adversos, período do início da deambulação e o tempo total de hospitalização. Resultados Trinta e quatro pacientes foram estatisticamente avaliados no estudo. Foi observada uma redução no consumo de opioides entre 24 e 48 h no grupo experimental. Uma redução maior da pontuação de dor foi observada no grupo placebo. Conclusão A infiltração periarticular anestésica como método de analgesia pós-operatória de artroplastia total do quadril, neste estudo, reduziu as taxas deconsumo de opioides

Analgesia por láser de baja potencia en pacientes con tratamiento ortodóncico / Low power laser analgesia in patients with orthodontic treatment i: en

Introducción: El dolor es el síntoma más común luego de la primera activación de la aparatología ortodóncica. El tratamiento analgésico más utilizado es el paracetamol; sin embargo, su uso inhibe la actividad de la ciclooxigenasa y la síntesis de prostaglandinas, lo que puede afectar el mecanismo del movimiento dental y el remodelado óseo. Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad del láser de baja potencia para el alivio del dolor en pacientes con tratamiento ortodóntico. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio cuasiexperimental de intervención terapéutica, desde enero hasta diciembre de 2020, en 40 pacientes atendidos en la consulta de ortodoncia del Hospital General Docente Dr. Juan Bruno Zayas Alfonso de Santiago de Cuba, en quienes se aplicaría fuerza ortodóncica por primera vez. Estos fueron distribuidos de forma aleatoria en 2 grupos de 20 integrantes cada uno: el de estudio, tratado con láser de baja potencia, y el de control, que recibió medicación convencional (paracetamol). Para la validación estadística de la información se emplearon el porcentaje y la prueba de la t de Student para muestras independientes, con 95 % de confiabilidad. Resultados: Luego de tres sesiones terapéuticas, 90,0 % del grupo de estudio refirió no presentar dolor o sentirlo de forma leve, mientras que del grupo de control solo 10,0 % de los pacientes fue ubicado en cualquiera de las dos categorías anteriores. Existió diferencia significativa entre ambos grupos (p=0,00). Conclusiones: Se demostró que el láser, como terapia alternativa, fue más efectivo que el paracetamol.

Introduction: Pain is the most common symptom after the first activation of orthodontic appliance. The most widely used analgesic treatment is paracetamol; however, its use inhibits cyclooxygenase activity and prostaglandin synthesis, which can affect the mechanism of tooth movement and bone remodeling. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of low power laser for pain relief in patients with orthodontic treatment. Methods: A quasi-experimental study of therapeutic intervention was carried out, from January to December 2020, in 40 patients treated at the orthodontic clinic of Dr. Juan Bruno Zayas Alfonso Teaching General Hospital in Santiago de Cuba, in whom orthodontic force was applied for the first time. These were randomly distributed into 2 groups of 20 members each: the study group, treated with low-power laser, and the control group, that received conventional medication (paracetamol). For statistical validation of data, the percentage and the Student's t test for independent samples were used, with 95 % confidence interval. Results: After three therapeutic sessions, 90.0% of the study group reported not presenting pain or feeling it slightly, while only 10.0% of patients in control group were put in any of the two previous categories. There was a significant difference between both groups (p=0.00). Conclusions: Laser, as an alternative therapy, was shown to be more effective than paracetamol.

Fidel Pagés, el auténtico descubridor de la anestesia epidural, en el centenario de su publicación Anestesia metamérica (1921-2021) / Fidel Pagés, the true discoverer of epidural anesthesia, on the centenary of his publication Anestesia metamérica (1921-2021)

Resumen: Pocas han sido las Figuras españolas que han aportado alguna interesante novedad al mundo de la anestesia, pero ninguna tan injustamente tratada y olvidada como la de Pagés, verdadero pionero de la anestesia epidural, que él denominaría «anestesia metamérica¼ en su artículo publicado en el mes de marzo de 1921 en la Revista Española de Cirugía, fundada por él mismo. Años después, en 1931, Dogliotti, profesor de Cirugía de Módena publicó sus experiencias sobre la anestesia epidural, a la que llamó «anestesia peridural segmentaria¼, ignorando el trabajo de Pagés publicado 10 años antes. El trabajo de Dogliotti fue rápidamente reconocido, asumiendo todos los méritos de la paternidad de la técnica epidural, quedando Pagés relegado a un olvido injusto que con este trabajo tratamos de reparar. La idea central de este texto versará sobre el reconocimiento de Pagés como verdadero promotor del abordaje epidural con fines quirúrgicos. Destacar sus ideas innovadoras sobre el bienestar del paciente y la minimización de los efectos adversos de las técnicas anestésicas y quirúrgicas, así como valorar una obra que, aunque corta, bien podría incluirse entre los mejores cirujanos españoles de principio del siglo XX, un cirujano con alma de anestesiólogo.

Abstract: Few Spanish Figures have contributed any interesting novelty to the world of anesthesia. But none so unjustly treated and forgotten such as Pagés, a true pioneer of epidural anesthesia, which he would call «metameric anesthesia¼ in his article published in March 1921 in the Spanish Journal of Surgery, founded by himself. Later, in 1931, Dogliotti, Modena Professor of Surgery published his experiences on epidural anesthesia, which he called «segmental peridural anesthesia¼, ignoring Pagés work published 10 years earlier. Dogliotti's work was quickly recognized, assuming all the merits of the paternity of the epidural technique, leaving Pagés relegated to an unjust oblivion that with this work we try to repair. The central idea of this text will focus on the recognition of Pagés as a true promoter of the epidural approach for surgical purposes. Highlight his innovative ideas about patient well-being and minimizing the adverse effects of anesthetic and surgical techniques. As well as assessing a work that, although short, could well be included among the best Spanish surgeons of the early twentieth century, a surgeon with the soul of an anesthesiologist.

Laser de baixa potência na cicatrização e analgesia de lesões mamilares: ensaio clínico / Low lavel laser in the healinh and analgesia of nipples trauma: clinical trial / Láser de baja potencia en la curación y analgesia de pezones juveniles: un ensayo clínico

Objetivo: Analisar a eficácia do laser de baixa potência, modalidade local e sistêmico, para cicatrização e redução da dor ocasionadas por lesões mamilares. Métodos: Ensaio clínico, randomizado e controlado realizado com 54 lactantes atendidas em um Banco de Leite Humano, de dezembro de 2017 a junho de 2018. As lactantes, que somaram um total 101 lesões, receberam orientações referentes ao manejo clínico das mamas e foram alocadas em: Grupo Controle (GC), Grupo Laser Local (GLL), que receberam laser diretamente no mamilo lesionado e Grupo Irradiation Laser Intravascular of Blood (GILIB), que receberam a laserterapia sistêmica. Os dados foram analisados no SPSS para avaliação da homogeneidade dos grupos (Kruskal-Wallis) e regressão linear para identificação do efeito da intervenção no tamanho das lesões mamárias e intensidade da dor. Resultados: Os três grupos de análise se mostaram homogêneos antes do experimento (p=0,191). Após a intervenção, houve cicatrização das lesões nos três grupos, sendo significativamente maior no GLL e GILIB (p<0,050). Quanto à dor, houve redução em até 4.0 pontos no GLL e GILIB (p=0,002). Conclusão: A administração da laserterapia local e sistêmica foi mais eficaz para a cicatrização das lesões mamilares e redução da dor, quando comparadas ao grupo controle. (AU)

Objective: To analyze the effectiveness of the low-potency laser, local and systemic, for the healing and reduction of pain caused by nipple trauma. Methods: Clinical, randomized and controlled trial carried out with 54 lactating women assisted in a Human Milk Bank, from December 2017 to June 2018. The lactating women, which totaled 101 lesions, received guidance on the clinical management of their breasts and breasts designated in: Control Group (CG), Local Laser Group (GLL), which received laser directly on the injured nipple, and Intravascular Blood Laser Irradiation Group (GILIB), which received systemic laser therapy. Data were analyzed using the SPSS to assess the homogeneity of the groups (Kruskal-Wallis) and the linear regression to identify the effect of the intervention on the size of breast lesions and the intensity of pain. Results: The three analysis groups were homogeneous before the experiment (p=0.191). After the intervention, the healing of the lesions in the three groups was significantly higher in GLL and GILIB (p<0.050). As for the pain, there is a reduction of up to 4.0 points in GLL and GILIB (p=0.002). Conclusion: The administration of local and systemic laser therapy was more effective for the cure of nipple trauma and pain reduction, in comparison with the control group. (AU)

Objetivo: Analizar la efectividad del láser de baja potencia, local y sistémico, para la cicatrización y reducción del dolor causado por las lesiones del pezón. Métodos: Ensayo clínico, aleatorizado y controlado realizado con 54 mujeres lactantes atendidas en un Banco de Leche Humana, de diciembre de 2017 a junio de 2018. Las mujeres lactantes, que totalizaron 101 lesiones, recibieron orientación sobre el manejo clínico de las mamas y fueron asignadas en: Grupo de Control (CG), Grupo de Láser Local (GLL), que recibió láser directamente en el pezón lesionado, y Grupo de Irradiación de Láser Intravascular de Sangre (GILIB), que recibió terapia con láser sistémico. Los datos se analizaron mediante el SPSS para evaluar la homogeneidad de los grupos (Kruskal-Wallis) y la regresión lineal para identificar el efecto de la intervención sobre el tamaño de las lesiones mamarias y la intensidad del dolor. Resultados: Los tres grupos de análisis eran homogéneos antes del experimento (p=0,191). Tras la intervención, hubo curación de las lesiones en los tres grupos, siendo significativamente mayor en GLL y GILIB (p<0,050). En cuanto al dolor, hubo una reducción de hasta 4,0 puntos en GLL y GILIB (p=0,002). Conclusión: La administración de la terapia con láser local y sistémica fue más efectiva para la curación de las lesiones del pezón y la reducción del dolor, en comparación con el grupo de control. (AU)

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to ropivacaine in paravertebral block for post-operative analgesia in breast cancer surgery

Background: Paravertebral block can be given for pain management after modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Although many additives to ropivacaine in PVB have been tried for post-operative analgesia, none has been found ideal. Aims and Objectives: We have compared the duration of analgesia in PVB using adjuvant like dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine after MRM. Materials and Methods: Sixty female patients posted for MRM and axillary dissection were split into two groups. Group R administered ultrasound-guided PVB with 20 ml ropivacaine 0.5% and Group RD administered 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg. After confirming PVB, surgery was done under general anesthesia in all patients. Time for 1st analgesia requirement was the main objective of our trial. Other objectives were to record visual analog scale scores and total analgesic need. Results: Post-operative analgesia duration was increased in the group RD (7.11 ± 1.42 h) in contrary to Group R (3.68 ± 1.85 h). Total paracetamol consumption post-operative 24 h was decreased in Group RD (1.63 ±0.89 g) in contrary to Group R (2.74 ± 0.76 g). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine in PVB provides prolonged pain relief after MRM.

Bilateral versus unilateral erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study

Abstract Introduction Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the common surgical intervention for benign biliary diseases. Postoperative pain after LC remains as an important problem, with two components: somatic and visceral. Trocar entry incisions lead to somatic pain, while peritoneal distension with diaphragm irritation leads to visceral pain. Following its description by Forero et al., the erector spinae plane (ESP) block acquired considerable popularity among clinicians. This led to the use of ESP block for postoperative pain management for various operations. Materials and methods This study was conducted between January and June 2019. Patients aged between 18 and 65 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study. All the patients received bilateral or unilateral ESP block at the T8 level preoperatively according to their groups. Results There was no significant difference between the groups in terms NRS scores either at rest or while coughing at any time interval except for postoperative 6th hour (p = 0.023). Morphine consumption was similar between the groups but was significantly lower in group B at 12 and 24 hours (p = 0.044 and p = 0.022, respectively). Twelve patients in group A and three patients in group B had shoulder pain and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.011). Discussion In conclusion, bilateral ESP block provided more effective analgesia than unilateral ESP block in patients undergoing elective LC. Bilateral ESP block reduced the amount of opioid consumption and the incidence of postoperative shoulder pain.

Regional analgesia and surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis

Abstract Background The effect of regional analgesia on perioperative infectious complications remains unknown. We therefore tested the hypothesis that a composite of serious infections after colorectal surgery is less common in patients with regional analgesia than in those given Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV-PCA) with opiates. Methods Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery lasting one hour or more under general anesthesia at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus between 2009 and 2015 were included in this retrospective analysis. Exposures were defined as regional postoperative analgesia with epidurals or Transversus Abdominis Plane blocks (TAP); or IV-PCA with opiates only. The outcome was defined as a composite of in-hospital serious infections, including intraabdominal abscess, pelvic abscess, deep or organ-space Surgical Site Infection (SSI), clostridium difficile, pneumonia, or sepsis. Logistic regression model adjusted for the imbalanced potential confounding factors among the subset of matched surgeries was used to report the odds ratios along with 95% confidence limits. The significance criterion was p < 0.05. Results A total of 7811 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria of which we successfully matched 681 regional anesthesia patients to 2862 IV-PCA only patients based on propensity scores derived from potential confounding factors. There were 82 (12%) in-hospital postoperative serious infections in the regional analgesia group vs. 285 (10%) in IV-PCA patients. Regional analgesia was not significantly associated with serious infection (odds ratio: 1.14; 95% Confidence Interval 0.87‒1.49; p-value = 0.339) after adjusting for surgical duration and volume of intraoperative crystalloids. Conclusion Regional analgesia should not be selected as postoperative analgesic technique to reduce infections.

Labor analgesia and its impact on the maternal and perinatal outcomes

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in parturients undergoing labor analgesia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in parturients who underwent labor analgesia. Parturients were categorized into three groups: Group 1 (n=83)—analgesia performed with cervical dilatation ≤4.0 cm; Group 2 (n=82)—analgesia performed with cervical dilatation between 5.0 and 8.0 cm; and Group 3 (n=83)—analgesia performed with cervical dilatation ≥9.0 cm. RESULTS: Analgesia in parturients with cervical dilatation ≥9.0 cm showed a higher prevalence and a 3.86-fold increase (OR 3.86; 95%CI 1.50-9.87; p=0.009) in the risk of forceps delivery. Analgesia in parturients with cervical dilatation ≤4.0 cm showed a higher prevalence and a 3.31-fold increase (OR 3.31; 95%CI 1.62-6.77; p=0.0016) in the risk of cesarean section. Analgesia in parturients with cervical dilatation ≥9.0 cm was associated with a higher prevalence of fetal bradycardia (20.7%), a need for neonatal oxygen therapy (6.1%), and a need for admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (4.9%). Analgesia in parturients with cervical dilatation ≤4 cm was associated with a higher prevalence of Apgar score <7 at 1st minute (44.6%). CONCLUSION: Performing labor analgesia in parturients with cervical dilatation ≤4.0 or ≥9.0 cm was associated with a higher prevalence of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.

The effects of magnesium sulfate added to epidurally administered local anesthetic on postoperative pain: a systematic review

Abstract Background This study evaluated the efficacy of epidurally administered magnesium associated with local anesthetics on postoperative pain control. Methods The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42021231910. Literature searches were conducted on Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials comparing epidural administration of magnesium added to local anesthetics for postoperative pain in elective surgical adult patients. Primary outcomes were the time to the first Postoperative (PO) Analgesic Request (TFAR), 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at the first six and 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV), pruritus, and shivering. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. Results Seventeen studies comparing epidural were included. Effect estimates are described as weighted Mean Differences (MD) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI) for the main outcomes: TFAR (MD = 72.4 min; 95% CI = 10.22-134.58 min; p < 0.001; I2= 99.8%; GRADE: very low); opioid consumption (MD = -7.2 mg (95% CI = -9.30 - -5.09; p < 0.001; I2= 98%; GRADE: very low). VAS pain scores within the first six PO hours (VAS) (MD = -1.01 cm; 95% CI = -1.40-0.64 cm; p < 0.001; I2= 88%; GRADE: very low), at 24 hours (MD = -0.56 cm; 95% CI = -1.14-0.01 cm; p= 0.05; I2= 97%; GRADE: very low). Conclusions Magnesium sulfate delayed TFAR and decreased 24-hour opioid consumption and early postoperative pain intensity. However, imprecision and inconsistency pervaded meta-analyses, causing very low certainty of effect estimates.

Dual epidural catheters for labor analgesia in a spinal cord injury patient: a case report

Abstract Impediment to local anesthetic solution in the epidural space results in unsatisfactory pain relief during labor epidural. Patients with a history of back trauma and spinal instrumentation have increased rates of epidural failure due to patchy spread of local anesthetic with obliterated epidural space. Dual Epidural Catheters (DEC) can be used in such clinical scenarios with complete labor analgesia and improved patient satisfaction. We present the successful management of a parturient with vertebral fracture at risk for epidural failure and neurologic injury due to bone fragments and inserted cranial and caudal to the fractured vertebra using ultrasound to avoid neurologic sequelae.

Comparación de la seguridad de sedoanalgesia entre propofol-fentanilo vs propofol-ketamina en pacientes con covid-19 sometidos a colonoscopias / Comparison of the safety of sedation analgesia between propofol-fentanyl vs propofol-ketamine in COVID-19 patients undergoing colonoscopies

Introducción: Los procedimientos anestésicos fuera de quirófano se han incrementado. Ahora se añade el reto del manejo del paciente con COVID-19, dentro de estos esta la colonoscopia que debe realizarse bajo sedoanalgesia, no se cuenta con un fármaco ideal por lo que se realizan combinaciones para la seguridad del paciente y personal de salud. Objetivo: Comparar la seguridad de sedoanalgesia con propofol-fentanilo vs propofol-ketamina en pacientes con COVID-19 sometidos a colonoscopia. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio experimental, transversal, comparativo con 60 pacientes sometidos a colonoscopia, estos fueron seleccionados por sucesión en 2 grupos: grupo A (propofol-fentanil) y grupo B (propofol-ketamina). Grupo A: fentanil 1 ug/kg y posteriormente propofol a 0,5 a 1,5 mg/kg, y mantenimiento con bolos de propofol a 0,5 mg/kg. Grupo B: se preparó mezcla de propofol-ketamina a proporción de 4:1, en la inducción se utilizó propofol (1mg/kg) y ketamina (0,25mg/kg), mantenimiento propofol (5 mg/kg/h) y ketamina (1,25 mg/kg/h). La información fue recolectada de fuentes primarias, se empleó el programa estadístico SPSS versión 22.0. Resultados: El grupo A tuvo tendencia a la bradicardia e hipotensión, además de mayor depresión respiratoria con una frecuencia de 4 (13,3%) en relación a 1 (3,3%) en el grupo ketofol. Conclusión: el ketofol demostró ser más seguro en comparación a propofol- fentanil para la sedoanalgesia en colonoscopia de pacientes COVID-19.

Introduction: Anesthetic procedures outside the operating room have increased. Now the challenge of managing patients with COVID-19 is included, within these is the colonoscopy that must be performed under sedo-analgesia, there is no an ideal drug so combinations are made for the safety of the patient and the health staff. Objective: To compare the safety of sedo-analgesia with propofol-fentanyl vs propofol-ketamine in patients with COVID-19 undergoing colonoscopy. Material and methods: An experimental, cross-sectional, comparative study was carried out in 60 patients submitted to colonoscopy, these were selected by succession into 2 groups: group A (propofol-fentanyl) and group B (propofol- ketamine). Group A: fentanyl 1 ug/kg and later propofol at 0.5 to 1.5 mg/kg, and maintenance with propofol boluses at 0.5 mg/kg. Group B: a mixture of propofol- ketamine was prepared at a ratio of 4:1, in induction propofol (1 mg/kg) and ketamine (0.25 mg/kg) were used, propofol maintenance (5 mg/kg/h) and ketamine (1.25 mg/ kg/h). The information was collected from primary sources, the statistical program SPSS version 22.0 was used. Results: Group A had a tendency to bradycardia and hypotension, as well as greater respiratory depression with a frequency of 4 (13.3%) in relation to 1 (3.3%) in the ketofol group. Conclusion: Ketofol has shown to be safer compared to propofol-fentanyl for colonoscopy sedo-analgesia in COVID-19 patients.

Severe irritability in a critically ill preterm infant: a case of delirium at the neonatal intensive care unit / Grave irritabilidade em prematuro criticamente doente: um caso de delirium na unidade de terapia intensiva neonatal

ABSTRACT Delirium is a common disorder in intensive care units, being associated with greater morbidity and mortality. However, in neonatal intensive care units, delirium is rarely diagnosed, due to the low familiarity of the neonatologist with the subject and the difficulties in the applicability of diagnostic questionnaires. This case report aimed to assess the presence of this disorder in this group of patients and identify the difficulties encountered in the diagnosis and treatment. We report the case of a premature newborn with necrotizing enterocolitis during hospitalization and underwent three surgical approaches. The newborn exhibited intense irritability, having received high doses of fentanyl, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, ketamine, phenytoin, and methadone, without the control of the symptoms. A diagnosis of delirium was then made and treatment with quetiapine was started, with a complete reversal of the symptoms. This is the first case reported in Brazil and the first describing the withdrawal of the quetiapine.

RESUMO Delirium é uma síndrome comum em unidades de terapia intensiva, associando-se a maiores morbidade e mortalidade. No entanto, nas unidades de terapia intensiva neonatal, ele raramente é diagnosticado em razão da baixa familiaridade do neonatologista com a suspeita diagnóstica e das dificuldades na aplicabilidade dos questionários diagnósticos. Este relato de caso tem como objetivos mostrar que delirium está presente nesse grupo de pacientes e apontar as dificuldades encontradas no seu diagnóstico e tratamento. Relatamos o caso de um recém-nascido prematuro com enterocolite necrosante, submetido a três abordagens cirúrgicas. O recém-nascido apresentou intensa irritabilidade, tendo recebido altas doses de fentanil, dexmedetomidina, clonidina, cetamina, fenitoína e metadona, sem controle dos sintomas. Em seguida, foi feita a hipótese diagnóstica de delirium e iniciado tratamento com quetiapina, com reversão completa dos sintomas. Este é o primeiro caso notificado no Brasil e o primeiro que descreve a suspensão da quetiapina.

Knowledge, acceptability and utilization of epidural analgesia in antenatal clinic attendees at UNIOSUN Teaching Hospital (UTH), Osogbo, Osun State

Labour pain is perceived as the most harrowing and agonizing event of a woman's life. Efforts at reducing the pain and making the event less stressful have predated modern obstetric practice. Epidural analgesia has provided effective pain relief in labour for over three decades. Delivery with epidural analgesia is routine for willing parturients in the developing world, however ignorance, cost as well as lack of qualified personnel has made this to be out of reach of the average Nigerian mother. The aim of this study was to assess level of awareness, acceptability, previous utilization and willingness to utilize epidural analgesia in labour following health education.Subjects/Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the antenatal clinic of UTH, Osogbo. Health education on events of labour and methods of analgesia available was provided to all antenatal clinic attendees between September 2021and March 2022, following which a semi­structured purpose designed, and self- administered questionnaire was administered to 415 of these women who consented to participate in this study. Results: The mean age of the respondents was 32.57± 4.42 years and mean parity of 1.73± 0.96. 70.8% reported that labour pain was severe. 41.7% were aware of epidural analgesia before the health talk. 3.6% of our subjects had utilized epidural in their last confinement. However, only 47.7% expressed a wish to utilize epidural analgesia in labour. Conclusion: Awareness of epidural analgesia in study population was passable at 40% however willingness to utilize it was less than average despite health talk and reassurance by their attending obstetric team.

Progress of injection sites of local infiltration analgesia in total knee arthroplasty / 中国修复重建外科杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To review the research progress of injection sites of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).@*METHODS@#The relevant domestic and foreign literature in recent years was extensively reviewed. The neuroanatomy of the knee, and the research progress of the selection and the difference of effectiveness between different injection sites of LIA in clinical studies were summarized.@*RESULTS@#Large concentrations of nociceptors are present throughout the various tissues of the knee joint. Patellar tendon, subpatellar fat pad, lateral collateral ligament insertions, iliotibial band insertions, suprapatellar capsule, and posterior capsule were more sensitive to pain. Most current studies support injections into the lateral capsule, collateral ligament, retinaculum, quadriceps tendon, fat pad, and subcutaneous tissue. Whether to inject into the back of the knee and subperiosteum is controversial.@*CONCLUSION@#The relative difference of knee tissue sensitivity to pain has guiding significance for the selection of LIA injection site after TKA. Although researchers have conducted clinical trials on injection site and technique of LIA in TKA, there are certain limitations. The optimal scheme has not been determined yet, and further studies are needed.