ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the attributable risk(AR)of Acinetobacter baumannii(AB)infection in criti-cally ill patients.Methods A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted among adult patients in inten-sive care unit(ICU).Patients with AB isolated from sterile body fluid and confirmed with AB infection in each cen-ter were selected as the infected group.According to the matching criteria that patients should be from the same pe-riod,in the same ICU,as well as with similar APACHE Ⅱ score(±5 points)and primary diagnosis,patients who did not infect with AB were selected as the non-infected group in a 1:2 ratio.The AR was calculated.Results The in-hospital mortality of patients with AB infection in sterile body fluid was 33.3％,and that of non-infected group was 23.1％,with no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P=0.069).The AR was 10.2％(95％CI:-2.3％-22.8％).There is no statistically significant difference in mortality between non-infected pa-tients and infected patients from whose blood,cerebrospinal fluid and other specimen sources AB were isolated(P＞0.05).After infected with AB,critically ill patients with the major diagnosis of pulmonary infection had the high-est AR.There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between patients in the infected and non-infec-ted groups(P＞0.05),or between other diagnostic classifications.Conclusion The prognosis of AB infection in critically ill patients is highly overestimated,but active healthcare-associated infection control for AB in the ICU should still be carried out.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility and associated virulence genes of the Staphylococcus aureus?strains?isolated?from?blood,?cerebrospinal?fluid?and?other?sterile?body?fluids?in?Huashan?Hospital?from?year?1999?to?2014.?Methods MIC values of vancomycin and other antibiotics against S. aureus were measured by agar dilution method. Resistant genes mecA and mecC and virulence genes PVL and sasX were detected by PCR in the S. aureus strains. Results The overall prevalence of MRSA in S. aureus was 54.3 % (140 / 258) and 45.7 % (118 / 258) for MSSA. Resistance rates of MRSA to most antimicrobial agents were higher than MSSA. MSSA strains were still sensitive to all the antibiotics tested, resistance rate not higher than 11% except penicillin. MIC90?values?of?β-lactam?antibiotics?(except?penicillin)?to?MSSA?were?lower?than?1?mg?/?L.?No? staphylococcal strains were found resistant to vancomycin, teicoplanin or linezolid. The mecA gene was present in all the 90 MRSA strains, and sasX gene in 46.7% of the strains. The prevalence?of?MRSA?isolated?from?blood,?cerebrospinal?fluid?and?other?sterile?body?fluids?decreased?year?by?year.?No?mecC gene?or?PVL?gene?was?identified?in?these?MRSA?strains.?Both?sasX-positive MRSA and sasX-negative MRSA were resistant to?β-lactam?antibiotics,?fosfomycin?and?levofloxacin.?The?sasX-positive MRSA strains showed higher resistance rates to amikacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole than sasX-negative MRSA. Conclusions? The?MRSA?strains?isolated?from?blood,?cerebrospinal?fluid?and?other?sterile?body?fluids?in?Huashan?Hospital?were?resistant to most commonly used anbiotics. MRSA surveillance is critical for rational use of antimicrobial agents.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the distribution and drug resistance of isolates between sterile body fluid and non‐sterile body fluid in the hospital in 2014 .Methods By adopting the retrospective analysis method ,we used BD phoenixTM 100 to conduct bacteria identification and drug susceptibility testing ,the Whonet5 .6 software and SPSS19 .0 software to statistically analysize the drug re‐sistance of the bacteria .Results E .coli ranked the top in sterile body fluid isolates(43% ) while the highest rate in non‐sterile body fluid was P .aeruginosa .E .coli(21% ) .Isolates from sterile body fluid had lower drug resistance rate to 11 kinds of antibacterials such as ampicillin ,chloramphenicol ,ciprofloxacin and aztreonam than the strains isolated from non‐sterile body fluid(P<0 .05) .S . aureus ,isolated from sterile body fluid ,had lower drug resistance rate to 6 kinds of antibacterials such as amikacin ,amoxicillin/cla‐vulanicacid ,ciprofloxacin than the strains isolated from non‐sterile body fluid .P .aeruginosa ,isolated from sterile body fluid ,had lower drug resistance rate to aztreonam than the srains isolated from non‐sterile body fluid .K .pneumoniae ,isolated from sterile body fluid ,had lower drug resistance rate to 6 kinds of antibacterials such as ampicillin/sulbactam ,sulfamethoxazole ,chlorampheni‐col than the strains isolated from non‐sterile body fluid(P<0 .05) .Conclusion There is significant difference between sterile body fluid and sterile body fluid in strain distribution and drug resistance ,so it is vital to enhance the bacterial resistance surveillance of sterile body fluid .