Assessment of neutrophil and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in coronary collateral developed patients with acute coronary syndrome

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE Inflammation-related markers provide diagnostic and prognostic information for coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome. We aimed to compare neutrophil count and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in acute coronary syndrome patients with coronary collateral development in our study. METHODS A total of 426 patients (102 unstable angina pectoris (USAP), 223 non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI), 103 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were compared regarding hemoglobin, platelet, lymphocyte, neutrophil count, and NLR. RESULTS Neutrophil count and NLR were significantly lower in USAP patients and higher in STEMI patients; 5.14± 1.79 vs. 7.21± 3.05 vs. 9.93±4.67 and 2.92±2.39 vs. 5.19±4.80 vs. 7.93±6.38, p <0.001. Other parameters, i.e., hemoglobin, platelet, and lymphocyte count, were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS In our study, it was concluded that there may be a statistically significant difference in the number of neutrophil counts and NLR among the types of acute coronary syndromes with coronary collateral development.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Marcadores relacionados a inflamação fornecem informações de diagnóstico e prognóstico para doença arterial coronariana e síndrome coronariana aguda. Nosso objetivo foi comparar o número de neutrófilos e razão neutrófilos/linfócitos (RNL) em pacientes com síndrome coronariana aguda com desenvolvimento de circulação colateral. MÉTODOS Um total de 426 pacientes [102 com angina de peito instável (APIN), 223 com infarto do miocárdio sem supradesnível de ST (IMSS), 103 com infarto do miocárdio com supradesnível de ST (IMCS)] foram comparados em relação a hemoglobina, plaquetas, linfócitos, neutrófilos e RNL. RESULTADOS O número de neutrófilos e RNL estavam significativamente mais baixos em pacientes com APIN e mais altos nos pacientes com IMCS; 5,14± 1,79 vs. 7,21± 3,05 vs. 9,93±4,67 and 2,92±2,39 vs. 5,19±4,80 vs. 7,93±6,38, p <0,001. Os outros parâmetros (hemoglobina, contagem de linfócitos e plaquetas) não foram significativamente diferentes entre os grupos. CONCLUSÃO No nosso estudo, concluiu-se que pode haver uma diferença significativa no número de neutrófilos e RNL entre os tipos de síndromes coronarianas agudas com desenvolvimento de circulação colateral.

Anticorpos contra LDL-ox e síndrome coronariana aguda / Antibodies against OxLDL and acute coronary syndrome

FUNDAMENTO: A oxidação da lipoproteína de baixa densidade (LDL-ox) induz à formação de epítopos imunogênicos na molécula. A presença de autoanticorpos contra a LDL-ox tem sido demonstrada no soro de pacientes com doença arterial coronariana (DAC). Contudo, o papel desses autoanticorpos na fisiopatologia das síndromes coronarianas agudas (SCA) e o seu significado clínico permanecem indefinidos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a associação entre autoanticorpos contra a LDL-ox e SCA. MÉTODOS: Os títulos de imunoglobulina G autoanticorpos contra a LDL-ox por cobre (antiLDL-ox) e contra o peptídeo sintético D derivado da apolipoproteína B (antipeptD) foram determinados por ensaio imunoenzimático (ELISA) em 90 pacientes, nas primeiras 12h de SCA (casos) e em 90 pacientes com DAC crônica (controles). RESULTADOS: Os resultados mostraram que os títulos de antiLDL-ox foram significativamente mais elevados (p = 0,017) nos casos (0,40 ± 0,22), do que nos controles (0,33 ± 0,23). Por outro lado, os títulos de antipeptD foram significativamente menores (p < 0,01) nos casos (0,28 ± 0,23) do que nos controles (0,45 ± 0,30). A diferença dos títulos de ambos anticorpos entre os dois grupos estudados foi independente de idade, sexo, hipertensão arterial, diabete melito, dislipidemia, índice de massa corporal, tabagismo, perfil lipídico, uso de estatinas e história familiar de DAC. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados mostraram que os títulos de antiLDL-ox foram significativamente mais elevados nos pacientes com síndrome coronariana aguda quando comparados aos pacientes com doença arterial coronariana e podem estar associados à instabilidade da placa aterosclerótica.

BACKGROUND: The oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) induces the formation of immunogenic epitopes in molecules. The presence of autoantibodies against oxLDL has been demonstrated in the serum of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the role of these autoantibodies in the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and their clinical significance remain undefined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between antibodies against oxLDL and ACS. METHODS: Titers of IgG autoantibodies against oxLDL by copper (anti-oxLDL) and anti-D synthetic peptide derived from apolipoprotein B (antipeptD) were determined by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 90 patients, in the first 12 hours of ACS (cases) and in 90 patients with chronic CAD (controls). RESULTS: The results showed that the titers of anti-oxLDL were significantly higher (p = 0.017) in cases (0.40 ± 0.22) than in controls (0.33 ± 0.23). On the other hand, the titers of antipeptD were significantly lower (p < 0.01) in cases (0.28 ± 0.23) than in controls (0.45 ± 0.30). The difference in the titers of both antibodies between the two groups was independent of age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, body mass index, smoking, lipid profile, statin use and family history of CAD. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the titers of anti-oxLDL were significantly higher in patients with acute coronary syndrome as compared to patients with coronary artery disease and may be associated with atherosclerotic plaque instability.

Marcadores pro y antiinflamatorios en la enfermedad arterial coronaria y el síndrome isquémico coronario agudo / Pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory markers in coronary artery disease and acute ischemic coronary syndrome

Inflammation plays an important role in the development of atherosclerotic lesions, affecting several stages of the atheroma's development going from the initial leukocyte recruitment to the eventual rupture of the unstable atherosclerotic plaque. The inflammatory reactions within coronary atherosclerotic plaques influence the clinical outcome of acute coronary syndromes and coronary artery disease. Recent studies suggest that inflammation markers may reflect different aspects of the atherothrombotic process in relation to the stages of acute coronary syndrome. These markers play an important role in the risk of developing coronary artery disease, and may correlate with its severity. Some cytokines, acute phase proteins, acute phase reactants proteins, and adhesion molecules released from the inflammatory cells may reflect the inflammatory process in atherosclerotic plaques. However, it remains to be determined whether these pro- and anti-inflammation markers may confer risk or protection for cardiovascular disease, or simply reflect the underlying disease process. The analysis of the markers may be useful for the development of new strategies for coronary disease prevention and treatment. Therefore, we need a well-designed evaluation of these markers before their use in the clinical practice.