Comparative Efficacy of Generic Salmeterol Xinafoate/Fluticasone Propionate MDI Fixed Dose Combination and Seretide ® MDI in Asthmatic Patients: An Open Label, Randomized, Phase III Study.

The addition of an inhaled long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) gives optimal control of asthma in most patients. The long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) Salmeterol xinafoate (Salmeterol) and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) fluticasone propionate (fluticasone) are being made available as a combination product Seretide® pMDI (Salmeterol/ Fluticasone) in a single aerosol inhaler. This randomized, open label, non-inferior, multicentric, 12-week, phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of generic Salmeterol/Fluticasone with commercially available product Seretide®. Materials and methods:Patients aged > 12 years inclusive of either sex (N = 372) with persistent asthma as defined by NHLBI for > 6 months prior to screening were included in the study. After a screening phase (1 week), eligible patients were enrolled in the trial with 2 weeks run in period. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either of the two treatment groups [HFA-Propelled pMDI Salmeterol/Fluticasone (25/250mcg) or HFA-Propelled Seretide® (25/250mcg) pMDI] in a ratio of 1:1 for the 12- week treatment period. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of Salmeterol/Fluticasone versus Seretide®, measured by mean pre-dose forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), at week 12. Results: This study provides evidence for the primary efficacy endpoint that Salmeterol/Fluticasone was statistically as well as clinically non-inferior to Seretide® in the treatment of patients with persistent asthma. This was supported by secondary endpoints which demonstrate that Salmeterol/Fluticasone appeared to be comparable to Seretide® in terms of efficacy for the secondary efficacy endpoints (morning PEFR, evening PEFR, diurnal variability of PEFR, daytime and night-time asthma symptoms score, average need for short acting-β2-agonists, proportion of patients that required rescue medication, patients with nocturnal asthma, patients without asthma symptoms of score 0 and average number of days without asthma symptoms of score 0). Salmeterol/Fluticasone was safe and well tolerated; and safety profile is comparable to comparator Seretide®. Conclusion: The results of study demonstrate that generic and innovator HFA formulations of Salmeterol/Fluticasone are clinically interchangeable. Overall, the study indicates that HFA-Propelled Salmeterol/ Fluticasone (25/250mcg) pMDI was safe, well tolerated and non-inferior in efficacy compared to HFA-Propelled Seretide® (25/250mcg) pMDI.

Predictors of Pulmonary Function Response to Treatment with Salmeterol/fluticasone in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease and responses to therapies are highly variable. The aim of this study was to identify the predictors of pulmonary function response to 3 months of treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone in patients with COPD. A total of 127 patients with stable COPD from the Korean Obstructive Lung Disease (KOLD) Cohort, which were prospectively recruited from June 2005 to September 2009, were analyzed retrospectively. The prediction models for the FEV1, FVC and IC/TLC changes after 3 months of treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone were constructed by using multiple, stepwise, linear regression analysis. The prediction model for the FEV1 change after 3 months of treatment included wheezing history, pre-bronchodilator FEV1, post-bronchodilator FEV1 change and emphysema extent on CT (R = 0.578). The prediction models for the FVC change after 3 months of treatment included pre-bronchodilator FVC, post-bronchodilator FVC change (R = 0.533), and those of IC/ TLC change after 3 months of treatment did pre-bronchodilator IC/TLC and post-bronchodilator FEV1 change (R = 0.401). Wheezing history, pre-bronchodilator pulmonary function, bronchodilator responsiveness, and emphysema extent may be used for predicting the pulmonary function response to 3 months of treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone in patients with COPD.

Esofagitis eosinofílica: presentación de 4 casos y revisión de la literatura / Eosinophilic esophagitis: report of four cases

Eosinophilic esophagitis is and uncommon disorder with an increasing incidence. We report four cases with ages ranging from 25 to 70 years. Disphagia of different intensity was present in all of them, the diagnosis was suggested by the endoscopic aspect and confirmed by histophatological finding of and increased eosinophilic infiltrate. A good response to treatment was observed in all the patients. This diagnosis should be considered in patients presenting with dysphagia or food impactation, mainly when stricture or narrowing are absent.

La esofagitis eosinofílica es una enfermedad poco frecuente con una incidencia en aumento. Se presentan 4 casos con un rango de edad entre 25 a 70 años. Todos presentaron disfagia de diferente intensidad, el diagnóstico se sospechó por el aspecto endoscópico y fue confirmado por el hallazgo histopatológico de un denso infiltrado eosinófilo. Una buena respuesta al tratamiento se observó en todos ellos. Este diagnóstico debe considerarse en presencia de disfagia o impactación de un bolo alimentario en ausencia de estrechez del lumen esofágico.

Esofagite eosinofílica em 29 pacientes pediátricos / Eosinophilic esophagitis in 29 pediatric patients

RACIONAL: A esofagite eosinofílica é uma entidade recentemente descrita, caracterizada por sintomas esofágicos, semelhantes aos da doença por refluxo gastroesofágico e importante eosinofilia esofágica. OBJETIVO: Apresentação de 29 pacientes com esofagite eosinofílica, discutindo as características clínicas, diagnóstico, tratamento e evolução. MÉTODOS: Foram identificados 29 pacientes (22 do sexo masculino) com idade entre 1 e 18 anos, nos quais as biopsias de esôfago demonstraram contagem de 20 ou mais eosinófilos/campo de grande aumento, sem infiltração eosinofílica em antro e/ou duodeno. Avaliaram-se as manifestações clínicas, achados endoscópicos e histológicos, tratamento e evolução. RESULTADOS: Os sintomas mais freqüentes foram vômitos em 15 pacientes (52 por cento) e dor abdominal em 11 (38 por cento). Os pacientes com idade inferior a 4 anos apresentavam recusa alimentar e baixo peso. Os com idades entre 5 e 8 anos apresentavam predominantemente dor abdominal e/ou pirose e/ou vômitos. Os pacientes com mais de 8 anos apresentavam dor abdominal, disfagia e/ou impactação alimentar eventual. Os achados endoscópicos incluíram estrias verticais em 14 pacientes (48 por cento), pontilhado branco em 12 (41 por cento), anéis circulares em 2 (7 por cento) e esofagite erosiva em 3 (10 por cento). Em sete pacientes a endoscopia foi normal (24 por cento). O tratamento incluiu fluticasona tópica em 19 pacientes e restrição dietética em 7. Os pacientes acompanhados apresentaram resposta favorável ao tratamento, com melhora ou remissão dos sintomas. Onze pacientes que foram submetidos a endoscopia de controle pós-tratamento apresentaram diminuição significativa do número de eosinófilos no esôfago. CONCLUSÕES: A esofagite eosinofílica deve ser considerada quando há sintomas de refluxo, que não respondem ao tratamento habitual. Os exames endoscópicos devem ser acompanhados de biopsias com análise detalhada do número de eosinófilos.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis is a recently described entity with esophageal symptoms like gastroesophageal reflux disease and significant esophageal eosinophilic infiltration. AIM: To present our clinical series of 29 children with eosinophilic esophagitis, describing the clinical and diagnostic features, treatment and outcome. METHODS: We describe 29 patients (22 boys), 1-18 years-old, with 20 eosinophils per high-power field in esophageal biopsy specimens and absence of eosinophilic inflammation in the stomach and duodenum. Evaluation of the clinical, endoscopic and histologic findings, treatment and outcome was undertaken. RESULTS: The most common presenting symptoms included vomiting in 15 patients (52 percent) and abdominal pain in 11 patients (38 percent). Children under the age of 4 years presented with feeding disorder and failure to thrive. Patients between 5 and 8 years of age presented commonly with abdominal pain or symptoms that may be associated with reflux (heartburn and/or vomiting). Patients over the age of 8 presented most often with abdominal pain, dysphagia and occasional food impaction. Endoscopic features included vertical furrowing in 14 patients (48 percent), whitish papules in 12 (41 percent), corrugated rings in 2 patients (7 percent) and esophageal erosions in 3 patients (10 percent). In seven patients endoscopy was normal (24 percent). Treatment included swallowed fluticasone propionate in 19 patients and restriction diet in 7 patients. Patients who returned for follow-up had either improvement or remission of symptoms. After treatment, endoscopic biopsies were repeated in 11 patients, and a significant decrease in esophageal eosinophil counts was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis must be considered when symptoms of reflux do not respond to conventional treatment. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy must be complemented by a detailed analysis of histologic findings and eosinophil...

Inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of respiratory allergy: safety vs. efficacy

OBJETIVO: Revisar os mecanismos moleculares de ação, eficácia e potenciais efeitos adversos relacionados aos corticosteróides inalados (CEI) em crianças com asma persistente. FONTES DOS DADOS: Artigos de língua inglesa da base de dados MEDLINE. Foram empregados os termos: corticosteroids, inhaled corticosteroids, asthma, children, beclomethasone, fluticasone, budesonide, ciclesonide, growth, adrenal insufficiency, bone mineral density, oral candidiasis. Foram selecionados guias de tratamento, artigos de revisão, estudos controlados, meta-análises e revisões sistemáticas que avaliaram a eficácia e os eventos adversos do tratamento com CEI. SíNTESE DOS DADOS: Estudos in vivo e in vitro mostram que os CEI disponíveis apresentam diferentes características farmacocinéticas e farmacodinâmicas que lhes conferem diferentes potenciais de ação. Os CEI também diferem quanto aos efeitos adversos sistêmicos e locais. Salienta-se a biodisponibilidade desses produtos como essencial para determinar a incidência de efeitos colaterais. Em linhas gerais, os CEI são capazes de controlar a asma, reduzindo o número de exacerbações, atendimentos médicos, hospitalizações e a necessidade de pulsos de corticosteróides orais. Também se observa melhora da função pulmonar, sobretudo nos pacientes com asma de início recente. O efeito adversos mais documentado é a desaceleração transitória do ritmo de crescimento. CONCLUSÕES: Os CEI são o principal agente antiinflamatório utilizado no tratamento da asma persistente. Quando administrados em doses baixas, mostram-se seguros e efetivos. O monitoramento dos pacientes permite a detecção precoce de eventuais efeitos adversos associados aos CEI.

OBJECTIVE: Review the molecular mechanisms of action, efficacy, and potential side effects associated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in children with persistent asthma. SOURCES: Articles in English from MEDLINE. The following terms were used: corticosteroids, inhaled corticosteroids, asthma, children, beclomethasone, fluticasone, budesonide, ciclesonide, growth, adrenal insufficiency, bone mineral density, and oral candidiasis. Treatment guidelines, review articles, controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy and the adverse events of treatment with ICS were selected. SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS: In vivo and in vitro studies show that the available ICS have different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties that result in different action potentials. ICS also differ as to the systemic and local side effects. The bioavailability of these products is essential in order to determine the incidence of side effects. In general, ICS are capable of controlling asthma, reducing the number of exacerbations, medical consultations, hospitalizations, and the need of oral corticosteroid (applications) bursts. Improvement can also be seen in pulmonary function, especially in patients with recent onset asthma. The most documented adverse effect is transitory decrease of growth rate. CONCLUSIONS: ICS are the main anti-inflammatory agent used to treat persistent asthma. When administered in low doses, they seem to be safe and effective. Patient monitoring allows for early detection of possible side effects associated with ICS.

Adesão ao tratamento de manutenção em asma (estudo ADERE) / Compliance with maintenance treatment of asthma (ADERE study)

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a adesão ao tratamento preventivo de asma persistente moderada e grave. MÉTODOS: Médicos de vários Estados do país foram contactados para selecionar asmáticos persistentes moderados ou graves, maiores de doze anos. Os pacientes receberam salmeterol/fluticasona 50/250 µg diskus durante 90 dias (sendo orientados a retornarem as embalagens ao final do estudo para conferência da dosagem total utilizada). Receberam telefonemas da equipe do estudo no início e ao final de 90 dias para que fosse avaliada a adesão. Foi considerado como aderente ao tratamento o asmático que utilizou no mínimo 85 por cento das doses prescritas. As variáveis estudadas foram sexo, idade, cor, estado civil, escolaridade, tabagismo atual, outras atopias, co-morbidades, gravidade da asma, uso de outras medicações e número de hospitalizações por asma. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 131 pacientes oriundos de quinze estados, com taxa geral de adesão de 51,9 por cento. Houve diferença significativa na adesão quanto à gravidade da asma (maior adesão nos casos graves; p = 0,02). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa nas demais variáveis. CONCLUSÃO: A taxa geral de adesão ao tratamento de manutenção da asma foi baixa.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of compliance with preventive treatment of moderate and severe persistent asthma. METHODS: Physicians at various medical centers across the country were invited to nominate patients for participation in the study. Inclusion criteria were being over the age of 12 and presenting moderate or severe persistent asthma. Participating patients received salmeterol/fluticasone 50/250 µg by dry powder inhaler for 90 days and were instructed to return the empty packages at the end of the study as a means of determining the total quantity used. In order to evaluate compliance, a member of the research team contacted each patient via telephone at the study outset and again at the end of the 90-day study period. Asthma patients were considered compliant with the treatment if they used at least 85 percent of the prescribed dose. The following variables were studied: gender, age, race, marital status, years of schooling, smoking habits, other atopic conditions, comorbidities, asthma severity, use of other medication and number of hospital admissions for asthma. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients from fifteen states were included. The overall rate of compliance was found to be 51.9 percent. There was a significant difference in compliance in relation to asthma severity: compliance was greater among patients with severe persistent asthma than among those with moderate persistent asthma (p = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences among any of the other variables. CONCLUSION: The overall rate of compliance with maintenance treatment of asthma was low.

Fluticasone propionate and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in childhood asthma.

Bronchial asthma is now agreed as being a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways. Inhaled steroids are widely accepted as a preventive medication in asthmatic patients of all ages and severity. However, the optimal use of inhaled steroids and the important issue of safety and efficacy still remain of concern, particularly in children. Recently, fluticasone propionate (FP) has been developed for use as an inhaled preparation for the treatment of asthma. Because of its high topical potency and increased lipophilicity, it is claimed that FP has an improved risk/benefit compared with other inhaled steroids. In order to evaluate the use of FP in children, we have studied the efficacy of high dose FP (500 microg/day) in asthmatic children. Thirteen children (9 boys and 4 girls), aged 7-17 years (10.8 +/- 2.6), were instructed to use a pressurized metered-dose inhaler connected to a Volumetric spacer. The standard methacholine bronchial challenge test was used as a principal outcome parameter. The PD20, a cumulative dose of methacholine inducing a 20% decrease in FEV1, was measured pre- and post-treatment with inhaled FP. After 4 weeks of FP, PD20 significantly increased from 21.6 +/- 14.3 inhalation unit to 106.6 +/- 78.5 inhalation unit (4.9 fold, p = 0.004) reflecting the improvement of airway reactivity. All subjects improved clinically. These results demonstrate that the anti-inflammatory action of FP 500 microg a day for four weeks can markedly reduce bronchial hyperresponsiveness, the basic physiologic abnormality in bronchial asthma.