ABSTRACT
Introducción: Las técnicas de anestesia y analgesia regional en la población pediátrica garantizan la estabilidad hemodinámica y respiratoria. El uso de la anestesia caudal ha aumentado enormemente sobre todo para cirugías de abdomen inferior lo que ofrece ventajas sobre la anestesia general. Objetivo: Argumentar sobre la base de la mejor evidencia científica, la opinión de los autores en relación a la efectividad del uso de la anestesia caudal en los pacientes neonatos. Método: El marco inicial de búsqueda bibliográfica se constituyó por los artículos publicados acerca de la utilización de la anestesia caudal en neonatos. Las fuentes de información que se utilizaron fueron: Registro Cochrane central de ensayos clínicos controlados, Pubmed, LILACS, SciELO, Ebsco, Science, Google académico. Resultados: El bloqueo caudal es la aplicación de un anestésico local en el espacio peridural, pero a nivel sacro, lo que ocasiona un bloqueo de conducción en las raíces nerviosas que cubre la analgesia, no solo el período intraoperatorio sino también el posoperatorio, lo cual permite una adecuada estabilidad hemodinámica, reduce el sangrado, evita el uso de opioides, anestésicos generales y relajantes musculares. La necesidad de asistencia respiratoria se ve reducida. Conclusiones: Es una técnica segura y económica en ocasiones subvalorada en el recién nacido. Esto, junto a una más rápida recuperación, lleva a considerar la anestesia regional como una alternativa a la anestesia general(AU)
Introduction: Regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques in the pediatric population guarantee hemodynamic and respiratory stability. The use of caudal anesthesia has increased enormously, especially for lower abdominal surgeries, which offers advantages over general anesthesia. Objective: To argue, based upon the best scientific evidence, the opinion of the authors regarding the effectiveness of the use of caudal anesthesia in neonatal patients. Method: The initial framework for the bibliographic search consisted of the articles published about the use of caudal anesthesia in neonates. The sources of information were the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Pubmed, LILACS, SciELO, Ebsco, Science, Google Scholar. Results: Caudal block is the application of a local anesthetic into the epidural space, but at the sacral level, which causes a conduction block in the nerve roots that covers analgesia, not only in the intraoperative period but also in the postoperative one, which allows adequate hemodynamic stability, reduces bleeding, avoids the use of opioids, general anesthetics and muscle relaxants. The need for respiratory support is reduced. Conclusions: It is a safe and economical technique, sometimes undervalued in the newborn. This, together with a faster recovery, leads to considering regional anesthesia as an alternative over general anesthesia(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Analgesics, Opioid , Anesthesia and Analgesia , Anesthesia, Caudal/methods , Intraoperative Period , Neonatology/educationABSTRACT
The pentalogy of Cantrell is a disorder characterized by congenital abnormalities in the abdominal wall, lower sternum, anterior diaphragm, diaphragmatic pericardium, and cardiac anomalies. It is a rare disease with 250 cases registered around the world. The anesthetic implications will require a specialized management given the ventilatory mechanics and cardiac function which are compromised by the disease in the newborn. We present the case of a female patient with pentalogy of Cantrell without prenatal diagnosis, who had an operative procedure to correct patent ductus arteriosus and abdominal mesh placement under balanced general anesthesia with sevoflurane and fentanyl plus caudal block. This case is reported to provide our experience in the anesthetic management of this type of patients.
La pentalogía de Cantrell es una enfermedad caracterizada por anormalidades congénitas de la pared abdominal supraumbilical, esternón inferior, diafragma, pericardio diafragmático y anomalías cardiacas. Se trata de una enfermedad rara con 250 casos registrados alrededor del mundo. Las implicaciones anestésicas requieren de un manejo especializado debido a la mecánica ventilatoria y función cardíaca que se encuentran comprometidas en el recién nacido. Se presenta el caso de una recién nacida portadora de pentalogía de Cantrell, no diagnosticada prenatalmente, quien fue sometida a corrección de ductus arterioso persistente y colocación de malla abdominal bajo anestesia general balanceada con sevofluorano y fentanilo más bloqueo caudal. Se reporta el presente caso para brindar nuestra experiencia en el manejo anestésico de este tipo de pacientes.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Infant, Newborn , Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/surgery , Pentalogy of Cantrell/complications , Anesthesia, Caudal/methods , Anesthesia, General/methods , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Hernia, InguinalABSTRACT
Fanconi anemia is a rare autosomal recessive inherited bone marrow failure syndrome with congenital and hematological abnormalities. Literature regarding the anesthetic management in these patients is limited. A management of a developmental dislocation of the hip was described in a patient with fanconi anemia. Because of the heterogeneous nature, a patient with fanconi anemia should be established thorough preoperative evaluation in order to diagnose on clinical features. In conclusion, we preferred caudal anesthesia in this patient with fanconi anemia without thrombocytopenia, because of avoiding from N2O, reducing amount of anesthetic, existing microcephaly, hypothyroidism and elevated liver enzymes, providing postoperative analgesia, and reducing amount of analgesic used postoperatively.
A anemia de Fanconi é uma síndrome hereditária autossômica recessiva rara, caracterizada por deficiência da medula óssea e anomalias congênitas e hematológicas. A literatura sobre o manejo anestésico dos pacientes é limitada. O manejo de uma displasia do desenvolvimento do quadril foi descrito em um paciente com anemia de Fanconi. Por causa da natureza heterogênea, um paciente com anemia de Fanconi deve ser submetido à avaliação pré-operatória para diagnosticar as características clínicas. Em conclusão, o bloqueio caudal foi a nossa escolha para esse paciente com anemia de Fanconi, sem trombocitopenia, para evitar o N2O, reduzir a quantidade de anestésico, a microcefalia existente, o hipotireoidismo e o aumento das enzimas hepáticas, proporcionar analgesia pós-operatória e reduzir a quantidade de analgésico usada no pós-operatório.
La anemia de Fanconi es un síndrome hereditario autosómico recesivo raro, caracterizado por deficiencia de la médula ósea y por anomalías congénitas y hematológicas. La literatura sobre el manejo anestésico de esos pacientes es limitada. El manejo de una displasia del desarrollo de la cadera fue descrito en un paciente con anemia de Fanconi. Debido a la naturaleza heterogénea, un paciente con anemia de Fanconi debe ser sometido a la evaluación preoperatoria para diagnosticar las características clínicas. En conclusión, el bloqueo caudal fue nuestra elección para ese paciente con anemia de Fanconi sin trombocitopenia para evitar el N2O, reducir la cantidad de anestésico, microcefalia existente, hipotiroidismo y aumento de las enzimas hepáticas, proporcionar analgesia postoperatoria y reducir la cantidad de analgésico usado en el postoperatorio.
Subject(s)
Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Anesthesia, Caudal/methods , Fanconi Anemia/surgery , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/surgery , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Fanconi Anemia/physiopathology , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapyABSTRACT
Purpose To evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of penile block, caudal block and intravenous paracetamol administration following circumcision. Materials and Methods In this prospective randomized study a total of 159 patients underwent circumcision under general anesthesia at urology clinic of Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine and Sorgun State Hospital between May 2012 and September 2012. The patients were randomized to three groups to receive penile block (Group 1), caudal block (Group 2) and intravenous paracetamol administration (group 3). Pain measurement of the patients was done via CHEOPS scoring system at 30,60,120 and 180 minutes postoperatively and compared. Statistical tests were performed with a conventional statistics program and statistical significance was set at a p value of < 0.05. Results The mean age of the patients was 5.7 years. Patients in group 1 had significantly lower pain score at 30 minutes compared to other two groups. At 60 minutes groups 1 and 2 had significantly lower score compared to group 3. At 120 and 180 minutes no difference between the groups was observed. No significant major complications were observed in all 3 groups. Conclusion Penile block and caudal block provide similar pain scores and painless postoperative periods after circumcision under general anesthesia. Intravenous paracetamol is insufficient at the early postoperative period. The three procedures were shown to be safe for analgesia following circumcision. .
Subject(s)
Child, Preschool , Humans , Male , Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Caudal/methods , Circumcision, Male , Nerve Block/methods , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Administration, Intravenous , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Spinal muscarinic M1 receptors are believed to be involved in the analgesic properties of spinal neostigmine. Aims were to determine the effect of adding neostigmine to bupivacaine on the duration of caudal analgesia as compared with caudal bupivacaine alone, to determine the need for rescue analgesics in the post-operative period. Material and Methods: 50 patients of ASA Grade I and II, aged between 2 to 8 years, of either sex underwent infraumbilical surgeries. Post-operative caudal epidural analgesia was activated after completion of the surgery and before recovery from anaesthesia Group-A (n=25) received caudal epidural injection of preservative free bupivacaine 0.125%. 2 mg/kg, Group-B (n=25) received both preservative free bupivacaine 0.125% and neostigmine 2μg/kg. Results and Analysis: After extubation children were evaluated for pain using the CHEOPS pain scale, shows no significant difference between the two study groups at 2 post-operative hours. Group B patients required less rescue analgesic than Group A patients in 24 hrs postoperative period. Conclusion: Addition of neostigmine to bupivacaine in caudal epidural bupivacaine prolonged the duration of caudal analgesia in the post-operative period compared to caudal bupivacaine alone.
Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Epidural/methods , Anesthesia, Caudal/methods , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Male , Neostigmine/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Umbilicus/surgeryABSTRACT
Caudal Epidural Anesthesia (CEA) or Kiddy caudal is a safe and effective method of anesthesia in paediatric patients. Incidence of failed or incomplete block of CEA could be reduced by simple modification of technique with early onset of analgesia, adequate surgical relaxation, rapid and smooth recovery from anesthesia and freedom from post-operative pain. Identification of epidural space using small volume of air and using mixture of lidocaine with epinephrine and bupivacaine for block provides excellent operating conditions with improved success rate avoiding supplementary general anesthetic requirement. Our experience in 120 pre-school children for infraumbilical surgery is described.
Subject(s)
Analgesia/methods , Anesthesia, Caudal/methods , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Combinations , Humans , Infant , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Lidocaine/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O bloqueio peridural caudal é a mais popular entre todas as técnicas de anestesia regional em crianças. Com o avanço da idade, apenas a relativa dificuldade em localizar o hiato sacral limita seu uso. Entretanto, em adultos a técnica vem sendo largamente utilizada para controle de dor crônica com o auxílio da fluoroscopia. Assim, a habilidade em localizar o hiato e definir as variações anatômicas é o principal fator determinante do sucesso e segurança na execução do bloqueio peridural pela via caudal. Nesse contexto, o ultrassom vem ganhando espaço como guia para a realização do bloqueio caudal. O objetivo desta revisão foi elucidar o papel do ultrassom na anestesia caudal, além de demonstrar que o bloqueio caudal, muito utilizado em crianças, também é útil e pode ser usado em adultos. CONTEÚDO: Uma revisão literária sobre a anatomia da região sacral e da técnica anestésica necessária para a realização adequada do bloqueio caudal foi promovida. Além disso, artigos recentes sobre estudos realizados com bloqueios peridurais caudais guiados por ultrassom tanto em crianças quanto em adultos também foram incluídos. CONCLUSÕES: O ultrassom, apesar de suas limitações, pode ser útil como ferramenta adjuvante no posicionamento da agulha no espaço caudal. Permite a fácil identificação da anatomia sacral, além de visualização da injeção, em tempo real. Sua natureza portátil, não invasiva e livre de exposição à radiação faz dele uma tecnologia atrativa na sala operatória, principalmente na emergência de casos difíceis. Entretanto, como seu uso em bloqueios centrais do neuroeixo ainda é muito primitivo, é necessário que mais pesquisas sejam feitas para se consagre como técnica de rotina na prática anestésica.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Caudal epidural anesthesia is the most popular regional anesthesia technique used in children. With advanced age, only the relative difficulty in localizing the sacral hiatus limits its use. However, in adults this technique has been widely used to control chronic pain by adjuvant use of fluoroscopy. Thus, the ability to locate the hiatus and define anatomical variations is the main determinant of the success and safety of caudal epidural anesthesia. In this context, the use of the ultrasound in caudal epidural anesthesia has been increasing. The objective of this review was to determine the role of the ultrasound in caudal epidural anesthesia and to demonstrate that this technique, widely used in children, is also useful and can be used in adults. CONTENT: A review of the literature on sacral anatomy and the anesthetic technique necessary to perform caudal epidural anesthesia was undertaken. Recent studies in ultrasound-guided caudal epidural anesthesia both in children and adults were also included. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its limitations, the ultrasound can be a useful tool to position the needle in the caudal space. It allows prompt identification of the sacral anatomy and real-time visualization of the injection. Considering it is portable, non-invasive, and free of radiation exposure, it is an attractive technique in the operating room especially in difficult cases. However, since its use in neuroaxis anesthesia is very primitive, more studies are necessary to make it a routine technique in anesthetic practice.
JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: El bloqueo epidural caudal es la más popular entre todas las técnicas de anestesia regional en niños. Cuando la edad avanza, apenas la relativa dificultad en localizar el hiato sacral limita su uso. Sin embargo, en los adultos, la técnica ha venido siendo ampliamente utilizada para el control del dolor crónico, con la ayuda de la fluoroscopía. Por lo tanto, la habilidad en poder ubicar el hiato y definir las variaciones anatómicas es el principal factor determinante del éxito y de la seguridad en la ejecución del bloqueo epidural por la vía caudal. En ese contexto, el ultrasonido ha venido ganando espacio como guía para la realización del bloqueo caudal. El objetivo de esta revisión fue elucidar el papel del ultrasonido en la anestesia caudal, además de demostrar que el bloqueo caudal, muy utilizado en niños, también es útil y puede ser usado en adultos. CONTENIDO: Se hizo una revisión literaria sobre la anatomía de la región sacral y de la técnica anestésica necesaria para la adecuada realización del bloqueo caudal. Además, también se incluyeron artículos recientes sobre estudios realizados con bloqueos epidurales caudales guiados por ultrasonido tanto en niños como en adultos. CONCLUSIONES: El ultrasonido, a pesar de sus limitaciones, puede ser útil como una herramienta coadyuvante en el posicionamiento de la aguja en el espacio caudal. Permite la fácil identificación de la anatomía sacral, además de la visualización de la inyección en tiempo real. Su naturaleza portátil, no invasiva y libre de exposición a la radiación, lo convierte en una tecnología atractiva en quirófano, principalmente en las situaciones de emergencia de casos complicados. Sin embargo, como su uso en bloqueos centrales del neuro eje todavía es muy primitivo, se hacen necesarias más investigaciones para que se consagre como una técnica de rutina en la práctica anestésica.
Subject(s)
Adult , Child , Humans , Anesthesia, Caudal/methods , Ultrasonography, InterventionalABSTRACT
Surgery and anaesthesia are known to cause stress response. Attenuation of stress response can decrease morbidity, postoperative hospital length of stay and, thus, cost. Intrathecal and epidural techniques produce reliable analgesia in patients undergoing surgery along with stress response attenuation. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of caudal sufentanil and bupivacaine combination on perioperative stress response in paediatric patients undergoing open heart surgery. Thirty patients (ASA grade II-III) undergoing elective corrective cardiac surgery for acyanotic congenital heart disease, were randomly allocated to two groups. In group GA (n = 15), patients received balanced general anaesthesia. In group GC (n = 15), in addition to general anaesthesia, caudal block with bupivacaine and sufentanil combination was given after endotracheal intubation. Monitoring included electrocardiography, invasive arterial pressure, end-tidal carbon dioxide, pulse oximetry, arterial blood gases including serum electrolytes, blood glucose, serum cortisol, urine output, central venous pressure and temperature. Haemodynamic responses in both groups were statistically similar. Serum cortisol levels were significantly lower in GC group than GA group (P < 0.05) after sternotomy (9.8+/-7.5 vs. 34.74+/-27.35), on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (12.17 +/- 6.2 vs. 35.36 +/- 24.15), after sternal closure (14.03 +/- 5.1 vs. 37.62 +/- 20.69), 4 hours (26.64 +/- 14.61 vs. 37.62 +/- 9.13) and 24 hours (14.30 +/- 8.11 vs. 28.12 +/- 16.31) after intubation. Blood glucose levels were significantly higher in GA group as compared to GC group at sternal closure (277.46 +/- 77.25 vs.197.73 +/- 42.17) and 4 hours (255.26 +/- 73.73 vs. 185.26 +/- 57.41) after intubation (P < 0.05). To conclude, supplementation of caudal epidural bupivacaine and sufentanil could effectively attenuate the stress response in paediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery under CPB in acyanotic congenital heart anomaly.