Utilization of antihepatocyte clone OCH1E5 (Hep Par 1) in histological evaluation of liver tumors.

Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not always easy on simple hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain. The diagnostic problems arise when tumor shows pseudoglandular, pleomorphic or clear cell differentiation. Various tumors markers have been described with varying sensitivity and specificity. Monoclonal antibody Hep Par 1 (OCH1E5) which is specific for hepatocytes offers great help in separation of these tumors. The aim of the present study was to determine utility of Hep Par 1 (OCH1E5) in differentiating HCC from metastatic tumors and cholangiocarcinoma. Total of 62 cases of liver tumors obtained from biopsies, resected or autopsy specimens were included in the study. Slides having representative sections were subjected to immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibody Hep Par 1 (Dako Corp) using avidin biotin technique with primary antibody dilution of 1:40. Adjacent nontumorous hepatocytes were taken as positive control. Slides were examined by experienced pathologist without any information of clinical or H&E diagnosis. Cases were considered positive for Hep Par 1 if tumor cells showed cytoplasmic brown colored granules. The intensity and distribution (diffuse/ focal) of immunoreactivity was noted. Subsequently immunohistochemistry results were correlated with histology and clinical diagnosis. Hep Par 1 antibody was positive in 26 (42 %) and negative in 36 (58 %) liver tumors. On correlating with H&E sections, out of 26 positive cases, 25 (89.2%) were HCC and one was the case of metastasis of mucin secreting adenocarcinoma. From 36 tumors with negative staining 3 were cases of HCC, 27 metastatic adenocarcinomas and 6 cholangiocarcinomas. Only one case of liver metastasis of mucin secreting adenocarcinoma showed positivity. None of the cases of cholangiocarcinoma showed positivity for Hep Par 1. The three HCCs which did not take up staining for Hep Par 1 were 2 cases of moderately differentiated HCC having pseudoglandular pattern and a case of well differentiated HCC with trabecular arrangement. In 11(44%) cases staining was diffuse while in 14 (56%) it was focal but intense. Hep Par 1 is a useful marker in differentiating HCC from metastaic tumors and cholangiocarcinoma with sensitivity and specificity of 89 % and 97 % respectively and positive predictive value of 96 %. However one should be aware of limitations of immunohistochemistry.

Targetted localisation and imaging of a murine lymphoma using 131I-labelled monoclonal antibody.

In vivo tumor targetting with radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies is a promising approach for the diagnosis and therapy of tumors. A specific monoclonal antibody (mAb), DLAB was generated to the Dalton's lymphoma associated antigen (DLAA) from Haemophilus paragallinarum-induced spontaneous fusion. In order to study the tumor localisation and biodistribution properties of the monoclonal antibody, scintigraphic studies were performed using the radiolabelled DLAB. 131-labelled DLAB was administered intravenously into Swiss mice bearing Dalton's lymphoma and external scintiscanning was performed at different time intervals. Clear tumor images were obtained which revealed selective and specific uptake of radiolabel and the results were compared with biodistribution data. The radioiodinated monoclonal antibody showed fast tumor uptake which increased significantly to 14.6% injected dose (ID)/g at 12 hr post-injection. Enhanced blood clearance of radioactivity resulted in higher tumor/blood ratio of 5.96 at 48 hr. 131I-labelled DLAB resulted in selective and enhanced uptake of the radioactivity by the tumor compared to the non-specific antibody and the results suggest the potential use of spontaneous fusion for producing specific monoclonal antibodies for tumor detection and therapy.

Reduction-mediated 99mTc-labeling of antitumor monoclonal antibodies: effect of increasing specific activity on antibody binding kinetics.

Reduction-mediated 99mTc-labeling of antibodies has gained widespread acceptance in preparation of tumor imaging agents. Increased specific activity to enhance detection signals has raised the question of whether such an attempt would cause change in antibody binding kinetics. To answer this question, two antitumor monoclonal antibodies, i.e. IOR-CEA (IgG1) and EMD (IgG2a) were labeled with 99mTc to yield specific activities ranging from 549-4414 MBq/mg. Regression analysis of the binding data revealed that the binding kinetics of IOR-CEA were shifted from monovalent to bivalent binding upon increasing the specific activities. This phenomenon of affinity enhancement was confirmed by the dissociation study where we found soluble CEA had greater difficulty in extracting the cell-bound IOR-CEA labeled at higher specific activity. The bivalent bindings was further supported by the finding that IOR-CEA with higher specific activities delivered less than expected radioactivity to tumor targets despite their immunoreactivities being well preserved. For EMD, the kinetics seemed to be shifted from bivalent to monovalent interaction. At higher specific activities, adverse changes in immunoreactivity were recognized. Breakage of EMD into 99mTc-Fab fragments was likely to occur and was supported by the observation that EMD delivered more than expected radioactivities to target cells upon increasing specific activity. Precaution should be taken when one deals with high specific activity labeling since this might alter the antibody binding kinetics either favorably or unfavorably.