ABSTRACT
De outubro a dezembro de 2007, 845 amostras de sangue foram coletadas de 836 vacas (98,9%) e nove touros (1,1%), em um matadouro com inspeção federal no Estado do Tocantins. Cento e quarenta e duas amostras [(16,8%) IC 95% 14,3-19,4] tiveram reação positiva ao teste do antígeno acidificado e tamponado de Brucella abortus. Um touro foi positivo ao teste. Quinhentos e sessenta e um bovinos (66,3%) procederam do Estado do Pará e 284 (33,7%) do Estado do Tocantins. A prevalência de soropositividade foi de 17,2% [IC (95%) 13,6 - 19,9] e de 16,6% [IC (95%) 13,0 - 22,2] para o gado do Pará e Tocantins, respectivamente. Estas prevalências não são significativamente diferentes (p > 0,05). Nenhuma das vacas tinha registro de vacinação contra brucelose. Os exames "ante e post-mortem" não detectaram qualquer sinal ou lesão sugestiva à brucelose, como descargas vaginais, orquites, artrites ou bursites [(0,00%) IC 95% 0,00-0,43] em todos os bovinos da amostra. Esta situação, associada às altas prevalências da doença e à falta de diagnóstico da brucelose nos rebanhos, aumenta o número de bovinos infectados abatidos sob condições sanitárias inadequadas, o risco de contaminação dos trabalhadores e a colocação no mercado, sem restrição, de carne de animais infectados.
From October to December 2007, 845 blood samples were collected from 836 cows (98.9%) and nine bulls (1.1%), in a slaughterhouse with federal inspection in the state of Tocantins. One hundred and forty-two samples [(16.8%) 95% CI 14.3-19.4] had positive reaction to the plate agglutination test carried out with acidified and buffered antigen of Brucella abortus. One bull was positive to the test. Five hundred and sixty one bovines came from the State of Pará (66.3%) and 284 (33.7%) came from the State of Tocantins. The prevalence of serum positivity was 17.2% [CI (95%) 13.6 19.9] and 16.6% [CI (95%) 13.0 22.2] for cattle came from Pará and Tocantins, respectively, with no significant difference between these frequencies (p > 0.05). None of the cows had record of vaccination against brucellosis. "Ante and post-mortem" examinations could not find any sign or lesion attributable to brucellosis, such as vaginal discharges, joint inflammation or bursitis [(0.00%) 95% CI 0.00-0.43] in all bovines sampled. This situation, coupled with the high prevalence of the disease and the lack of brucellosis diagnostic at herds, increases the number of infected cattle slaughtered under inadequate sanitary conditions, the risk of contamination of workers and placing on the market, without restriction, the meat from infected animals.
Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Wounds and Injuries/veterinary , Brucella abortus/isolation & purification , Brucellosis, Bovine/blood , Brucellosis, Bovine/epidemiology , Brazil , Veterinary Public Health , Sanitary InspectionABSTRACT
Brucella abortus (Br abortus) es una de las principales causas de abortos y pérdidas reproductivas en el ganado bovino. Los fetos abortados y sus fluidos fetales son la mayor fuente de infección. Es así como la enfermedad puede llegar a animales silvestres cuando ingieren esos tejidos. El objetivo de este trabajo fue determinar la prevalencia serológica de brucelosis en el zorro gris pampeano (Pseudalopex gymnocercus). Se tomaron muestras de sangre de 41 zorros de la región centro-este de la provincia de La Pampa, Argentina. Para determinar la presencia de anticuerpos específicos contra Br abortus se utilizaron las Pruebas de Polarización de la Fluorescencia (FPA), Seroaglutinación en Microplaca (SAP) y Seroaglutinación en Microplaca con 2-mercaptoetanol (2-ME). Sobre un total de 41 sueros procesados por FPA, en 7 (17,1%) se detectaron anticuerpos contra Br abortus. Sólo 34 sueros fueron analizados por las pruebas de SAP y 2-ME, encontrando 5 (14,7%) y 4 (11,8%) muestras positivas, respectivamente. Los resultados permiten inferir que el zorro gris pampeano es susceptible a infectarse con Br. abortus a una tasa de incidencia importante. Es necesario realizar futuros estudios para establecer el rol del zorro en la transmisión de la enfermedad y sus consecuencias en esta especie.
Brucellosis is produced by several species of Brucella. Brucella abortus causes abortion and reproductive loss in bovine cattle. In the epidemiology of brucellosis, aborted fetus and their fetal fluids are the main source of infection and dissemination. Although the biological cycle and the disease consequences to domestic cattle have been widely studied, it is not the case with wild fauna. The objective of this study was to determine the serologic prevalence to brucellosis in the grey fox of the pampas (Pseudalopex gymnocercus). To that purpose, 41 foxes were sampled in the centre-east area of La Pampa province (Argentina). Blood samples for serologic studies were collected. A test of agglutination in microplate (SAP), another SAP with the addition of 2-mercapto-etanol (2-ME) and a test of polarization of the fluorescence (FPA) were used for the diagnosis of antibodies against Brucella abortus. For this, 17.1%, 14.7% and 11.8% was the prevalence found by FPA, SAP and SAP with 2-ME. More studies will be necessary to know the role of foxes in disease transmission and maintenance as well as the consequence of the diseases in foxes.
Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Brucella , Brucellosis, Bovine/blood , Argentina , Brucellosis, Bovine/diagnosis , Fluorescence Polarization/methods , Foxes/microbiologyABSTRACT
We investigated the seroprevalence and risk factors for Brucella seropositivity in cattle in Jordan. The sera from 671 cows were randomly collected from 62 herds. The antibodies against Brucella were detected using a Rose Bengal plate test and indirect ELISA. A structured questionnaire was used to collect information on the cattle herds' health and management. A multiple logistic regression model was constructed to identify the risk factors for Brucella seropositivity. The true prevalence of antibodies against Brucella in individual cows and cattle herds was 6.5% and 23%, respectively. The seroprevalence of brucellosis in cows older than 4 years of age was significantly higher than that in the younger cows. The seroprevalence of brucellosis in cows located in the Mafraq, Zarqa and Ma'an governorates was significantly higher than that of the other studied governorates. The multiple logistic regression model revealed that a larger herd size (odd ratio = 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.6) and mixed farming (OR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.7, 3.7) were risk factors for cattle seropositivity to Brucella antigens. On the other hand, the use of disinfectants (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.1) and the presence of adequate veterinary services (OR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2, 3.2) were identified as protective factors.