Efecto angiogénico comparado del celecoxib microencapsulado en PLGA v/s no encapsulado en un ensayo in vivo de angiogénesis / Comparative angiogenic effect of microencapsulated celecoxib in PLGA v/s non-encapsulated in an in vivo angiogenesis assay

RESUMEN: La angiogénesis es el proceso de formación de vasos sanguíneos a partir de otros formados previamente. Existen varios factores que están involucrados en el proceso, así como agentes capaces de modular distintas etapas de esta. Si bien, se ha observado que Celecoxib es capaz de inhibir la angiogénesis en distintos modelos, aún no se ha observado la potencial capacidad antiangiogénica de este agente cuando es microencapsulado en PLGA. Se incubaron huevos fertilizados y a las 48 horas se dividieron en 4 grupos para ser instilados con PBS (control), PLGA, Celecoxib 1000 ppm o Celecoxib 1000 ppm + PLGA. Se realizó un conteo de los vasos sanguíneos a las 48, 72 y 96 horas post aplicación de la solución a estudiar. Los resultados muestran que tanto Celecoxib como Celecoxib+PLGA reducen los vasos sanguíneos, manteniendo el mismo efecto a las 48, 72 y 96 horas y no existen diferencias significativas entre los dos tratamientos. Esto podría ser explicado por la concentración de Celecoxib usada o el margen de tiempo analizado, pudiendo encontrarse diferencias posteriores a este rango de tiempo o con concentraciones distintas.

SUMMARY: Angiogenesis is the process of blood vessel formation from previously formed ones. There are several factors involved in the process, as well as agents capable of modulating different stages of it. Although, it has been observed that Celecoxib is capable of inhibiting angiogenesis in different models, the potential antiangiogenic capacity of this agent has not yet been observed when it is microencapsulated in PLGA. Fertilized eggs were incubated and at 48 hours they were divided into 4 groups to be instilled with PBS (control), PLGA, Celecoxib 1000ppm or Celecoxib 1000 ppm + PLGA. A blood vessel count was performed at 48, 72 and 96 hours after application of the solution to be studied. The results show that both Celecoxib and Celecoxib + PLGA reduce blood vessels, maintaining the same effect at 48, 72 and 96 hours and there are no significant differences between the two treatments. This could be explained by the concentration of Celecoxib used or the time frame analyzed, being able to find differences after this time range or with different concentrations.

Cyclooxygenase-2 promotes ovarian cancer cell migration and cisplatin resistance via regulating epithelial mesenchymal transition / 浙江大学学报（英文版）（B辑：生物医学和生物技术）

OBJECTIVE@#Drug-resistance and metastasis are major reasons for the high mortality of ovarian cancer (OC) patients. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) plays a critical role in OC development. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of COX-2 on migration and cisplatin (cis-dichloro diammine platinum, CDDP) resistance of OC cells and explore its related mechanisms.@*METHODS@#Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was used to detect the cytotoxicity effects of celecoxib (CXB) and CDDP on SKOV3 and ES2 cells. The effect of COX-2 on migration was evaluated via the healing test. Western blot and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) were used to analyze E-cadherin, vimentin, Snail, and Slug levels.@*RESULTS@#COX-2 promoted drug-resistance and cell migration. CXB inhibited these effects. The combination of CDDP and CXB increased tumor cell sensitivity, reduced the amount of CDDP required, and shortened treatment administration time. COX-2 upregulation increased the expression of Snail and Slug, resulting in E-cadherin expression downregulation and vimentin upregulation.@*CONCLUSIONS@#COX-2 promotes cancer cell migration and CDDP resistance and may serve as a potential target for curing OC.

Periapical bone response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide is shifted upon cyclooxygenase blockage

Abstract Objectives: Infection, inflammation and bone resorption are closely related events in apical periodontitis development. Therefore, we sought to investigate the role of cyclooxygenase (COX) in osteoclastogenesis and bone metabolism signaling in periapical bone tissue after bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) inoculation into root canals. Methodology: Seventy two C57BL/6 mice had the root canals of the first molars inoculated with a solution containing LPS from E. coli (1.0 mg/mL) and received selective (celecoxib) or non-selective (indomethacin) COX-2 inhibitor. After 7, 14, 21 and 28 days the animals were euthanized and the tissues removed for total RNA extraction. Evaluation of gene expression was performed by qRT-PCR. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-tests (α=0.05). Results: LPS induced expression of mRNA for COX-2 (Ptgs2) and PGE2 receptors (Ptger1, Ptger3 and Ptger4), indicating that cyclooxygenase is involved in periapical response to LPS. A signaling that favours bone resorption was observed because Tnfsf11 (RANKL), Vegfa, Ctsk, Mmp9, Cd36, Icam, Vcam1, Nfkb1 and Sox9 were upregulated in response to LPS. Indomethacin and celecoxib differentially modulated expression of osteoclastogenic and other bone metabolism genes: celecoxib downregulated Igf1r, Ctsk, Mmp9, Cd36, Icam1, Nfkb1, Smad3, Sox9, Csf3, Vcam1 and Itga3 whereas indomethacin inhibited Tgfbr1, Igf1r, Ctsk, Mmp9, Sox9, Cd36 and Icam1. Conclusions: We demonstrated that gene expression for COX-2 and PGE2 receptors was upregulated after LPS inoculation into the root canals. Additionally, early administration of indomethacin and celecoxib (NSAIDs) inhibited osteoclastogenic signaling. The relevance of the cyclooxygenase pathway in apical periodontitis was shown by a wide modulation in the expression of genes involved in both bone catabolism and anabolism.

Experimental evidence of pharmacological management of anchorage in Orthodontics: A systematic review

Introduction: Orthodontic anchorage is one of the most challenging aspects of Orthodontics. Preventing undesired movement of teeth could result in safer and less complicated orthodontic treatment. Recently, several reviews have been published about the effects of different molecules on bone physiology and the clinical side effects in Orthodontics. However, the effects of local application of these substances on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement have not been assessed.Objectives: The aim of this research was to analyze the scientific evidence published in the literature about the effects of different molecules on orthodontic anchorage.Methods: The literature was systematically reviewed using PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Cochrane databases from 2000 up to July 31st, 2014. Articles were independently selected by two different researchers based on previously established inclusion and exclusion criteria, with a concordance Kappa index of 0.86. The methodological quality of the reviewed papers was performed.Results: Search strategy identified 270 articles. Twenty-five of them were selected after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and only 11 qualified for final analysis. Molecules involved in orthodontic anchorage were divided into three main groups: osteoprotegerin (OPG), bisphosphonates (BPs) and other molecules (OMs).Conclusions: Different drugs are able to alter the bone remodeling cycle, influencing osteoclast function and, therefore, tooth movement. Thus, they could be used in order to provide maximal anchorage while preventing undesired movements. OPG was found the most effective molecule in blocking the action of osteoclasts, thereby reducing undesired movements.

Introdução: a ancoragem ortodôntica é um dos aspectos mais desafiadores da Ortodontia. A prevenção de movimentos dentários indesejados poderia resultar em um tratamento ortodôntico mais seguro e menos complexo. Recentemente, foram publicadas várias revisões de literatura sobre os efeitos de diferentes substâncias na fisiologia do tecido ósseo e os efeitos colaterais clínicos na Ortodontia. Porém, os efeitos da aplicação local dessas substâncias no grau de movimentação dentária ortodôntica não foram avaliados.Objetivos: o objetivo da presente pesquisa foi analisar a evidência científica publicada na literatura sobre os efeitos de diferentes substâncias na ancoragem ortodôntica.Métodos: a literatura foi sistematicamente revisada utilizando-se as bases de dados PubMed/Medline, Scopus e Cochrane, de 2000 a 31 de julho de 2014. Os artigos foram selecionados, de maneira independente, por dois pesquisadores diferentes, tendo como base critérios de inclusão e exclusão previamente estabelecidos, com um índice Kappa de concordância de 0,86. A qualidade metodológica dos artigos revisados foi analisada.Resultados: a estratégia de pesquisa identificou 270 artigos; 25 artigos foram selecionados após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão, mas apenas 11 foram qualificados para a análise final. As substâncias envolvidas na ancoragem ortodôntica foram divididas em três grupos principais: osteoprotegerina (OPG), bisfosfonatos (BFs) e outras substâncias (OSs).Conclusões: diferentes substâncias são capazes de alterar o ciclo de remodelação óssea, influenciando na função dos osteoclastos e, portanto, na movimentação dentária. Sendo assim, essas substâncias podem ser utilizadas para promover o máximo de ancoragem e prevenir movimentos indesejados. A OPG foi a substância mais eficaz no bloqueio da ação dos osteoclastos, reduzindo os movimentos indesejados.

Comparison of pharmacological and genetic inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2: effects on adult neurogenesis in the hippocampal dentate gyrus

Inducible cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) has received much attention because of its role in neuro-inflammation and synaptic plasticity. Even though COX-2 levels are high in healthy animals, the function of this factor in adult neurogenesis has not been clearly demonstrated. Therefore, we performed the present study to compare the effects of pharmacological and genetic inhibition of COX-2 on adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Physiological saline or the same volume containing celecoxib was administered perorally every day for 5 weeks using a feeding needle. Compared to the control, pharmacological and genetic inhibition of COX-2 reduced the appearance of nestin-immunoreactive neural stem cells, Ki67-positive nuclei, and doublecortin-immunoreactive neuroblasts in the dentate gyrus. In addition, a decrease in phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein (pCREB) at Ser133 was observed. Compared to pharmacological inhibition, genetic inhibition of COX-2 resulted in significant reduction of neural stem cells, cell proliferation, and neuroblast differentiation as well as pCREB levels. These results suggest that COX-2 is part of the molecular machinery that regulates neural stem cells, cell proliferation, and neuroblast differentiation during adult hippocampal neurogenesis via pCREB. Additionally, genetic inhibition of COX-2 strongly reduced neural stem cell populations, cell proliferation, and neuroblast differentiation in the dentate gyrus compared to pharmacological inhibition.

Effect of the celexoxib in microscopic changes of the esophageal mucosal of rats induced by esofagojejunostomy / Efeito do celecoxibe nas alterações microscópicas da mucosa esofágica de ratos causadas por esofagojejunostomia

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the protective effect of celecoxib in the esophageal mucosa in rats undergoing esofagojejunostomy. METHODS: Sixty male Wistar rats from the vivarium of the University of Health Sciences of Alagoas were used for the experiment. The animals were divided into four groups: Group I, 15 rats undergoing esofagojejunostomy with the use of celecoxib postoperatively; Group II, 15 rats undergoing esofagojejunostomy without the use of celecoxib; Group III, 15 rats undergoing celiotomy with bowel manipulation; and Group IV, 15 rats without surgery and using celecoxib. The observation period was 90 days. After the death of the animals, the distal segment of the esophagus was resected and sent for microscopic analysis. RESULTS: esofagojejunostomy caused macroscopic and microscopic esophagitis. Esophagitis was equal in both groups I and II. In groups III and IV esophageal lesions were not developed. CONCLUSIONS: celecoxib had neither protective nor inducing effect on esophagitis, but had a protective effect on dysplasia of the animals of group I. .

OBJETIVO: avaliar o efeito do celecoxibe como função protetora na mucosa esofágica, em ratos machos Wistar, submetidos à esofagojejunostomia. MÉTODOS: sessenta animais oriundos do biotério da Universidade de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas foram utilizados para o experimento. Os animais foram distribuídos em quatro grupos: Grupo I, 15 ratos que foram submetidos à esofagojejustomia e que utilizaram o celecoxibe no pós-operatório, Grupo II, 15 ratos submetidos à esofagojejunostomia sem uso de celecoxibe, Grupo III, 15 ratos submetidos à celiotomia com manipulação de alças, e Grupo IV, 15 ratos sem cirurgia e que utilizaram celecoxibe. O período de observação foi de 90 dias. Após a morte dos animais, o seguimento distal do esôfago foi ressecado e enviado para análise macro e microscópicas. RESULTADOS: a esofagojejunostomia causou esofagite macro e microscópica. A esofagite foi igual tanto no grupo I quanto no II. Nos animais dos grupos III e IV não foram desenvolvidas lesões esofagianas. CONCLUSÕES: o celecoxibe não teve efeito protetor nem indutor nas esofagites, mas obteve efeito protetor nas displasias dos animais do grupo I. .