ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objectives: to evaluate the quality of life of nursing professionals who work in a central sterile processing department. Methods: a descriptive, quantitative, exploratory study, conducted with 82 nursing professionals working in the Central Sterile Processing Department of a University Hospital, from September to November 2017. A semi-structured instrument and the questionnaire "Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36" were used. Results: most of the participants were female, married, aged 31-40 years; 47.6% with 6-10 years of profession, and 82.9% reported working in CSPD for 1-5 years. The most affected quality of life domains were Pain, Vitality, General Health Status and Social Aspects. Conclusions: This study showed a need for rethinking and re-creating the labor dynamics in CSPD to improve the quality of life of these nursing professionals.
RESUMEN Objetivos: evaluar la calidad de vida de los profesionales de enfermería que actúan en una central de materiales y esterilización. Métodos: estudio exploratorio, descriptivo, cuantitativo, realizado con 82 profesionales de enfermería que actuaban en una central de materiales y esterilización (CME) de un Hospital Universitario, en el período de septiembre a noviembre de 2017. Se utilizó un instrumento semiestructurado y el cuestionario Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36. Resultados: los participantes eran, en su mayoría, del sexo femenino, estaban casados y en el grupo de edad de 31-40 años; El 47,6% tenía entre 6-10 años de profesión y el 82,9% mencionó el tiempo de servicio en CME de 1-5 años. Los Dominios de calidad de vida más frecuentes fueron Dolor, Vitalidad, Estado General de Salud y Aspectos Sociales. Conclusiones: El estudio reveló que es necesario repensar y recrear la dinámica del trabajo en CME para que se mejore la calidad de vida de esos profesionales de enfermería.
RESUMO Objetivos: avaliar a qualidade de vida dos profissionais de enfermagem que atuam em uma central de materiais e esterilização (CME). Métodos: estudo exploratório, descritivo, quantitativo, realizado com 82 profissionais da enfermagem que atuavam na central de materiais e esterilização de um hospital universitário, no período de setembro a novembro de 2017. Foi aplicado um instrumento semiestruturado e um questionário, "Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36". Resultados: os participantes eram, em maioria, do sexo feminino, casados, na faixa etária de 31-40 anos; 47,6% tinham de 6-10 anos de profissão e 82,9% referiram tempo de serviço em CME de 1-5 anos. Os domínios de qualidade de vida mais atingidos foram Dor, Vitalidade, Estado Geral de Saúde e Aspectos Sociais. Conclusões: O estudo mostrou que é preciso repensar e recriar a dinâmica do trabalho em CME na perspectiva de melhorar a qualidade de vida desses profissionais de enfermagem.
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life/psychology , Central Supply, Hospital/standards , Disinfection/organization & administration , Nurses/psychology , Central Supply, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Job SatisfactionSubject(s)
Humans , Central Supply, Hospital/organization & administration , Surgery Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital , Sterilization/instrumentation , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Materials Management, Hospital , Central Supply, Hospital/standards , Anesthesia , Surgery Department, Hospital/standards , Surgery Department, Hospital , Postoperative Complications , Nursing Care , Disinfection/standards , Health Information Management , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Patient PositioningABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To develop quality indicators for assessing the performance of central sterile supply department. (CSSD). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Quality indicators for sterilization in CSSD were searched by literature review and by current situation analysis by 79 infection control nurses (ICNs) and 83 heads of CSSD. Quality indicators were drafted and subsequently validated by 5 experts. The feasibility and applicability of the quality indicators were tested in 37 ICNs and 34 heads of CSSD. The quality indicators were finally refined by a forum of 5 experts and 5 representatives from CSSD. RESULTS: A total of 30 quality indicators were developed. These include 9 indicators for structure, 12 for process and 9 for output of CSSD. The quality indicators were deemed appropriate for the assessment of the quality of CSSD in Thailand. CONCLUSION: Thirty indicators were developed for assessing the quality of CSSD.