Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association [The]. 1996; 71 (1-2): 63-78
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-41481

ABSTRACT

Two hundred positive blood culture typhoid patients admitted to Embaba Fever Hospital, Giza province, were subjected to: 1] Careful history and thorough clinical examination. 2] Complete blood picture. 3] Widal agglutination teat. 4] Urine and stool cultures for Salmonellae. 5] To the isolates of the cultures, disk diffusion chloramphenicol susceptibility test, minimum inhibitory concentrations and chloramphenicol acetyl transferase test were performed. The dose of chloramphenicol was restricted to 50 mg per Kg body weight daily, whatever the route used; whether oral, rectal or intravenous. When fever did not drop up to 5 days or the patient presented with typhoid complications or the blood culture revealed resistant Salmonellae, quinolones or third generation, cephalosporins were administered. Measurement of the level of chloramphenicol in the blood was performed for every patient. Fifty [25%] patients were found to be resistant in vitro and in vivo to chloramphenicol. All their Salmonellae isolates were resistant to chloramphenicol the mean zone size was 10 mm, the mean inhibitory concentration was 64 microgram per ml. and all were positive for chloramphenicol acetyl transferase. There was no significant difference in the serum level of chloramphenicol between susceptible and resistant groups to the drug. Results were interpreted and discussed


Subject(s)
Humans , Chloramphenicol Resistance/physiology , Chloramphenicol/pharmacology , Treatment Failure
2.
Indian Pediatr ; 1992 Apr; 29(4): 443-8
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-14448

ABSTRACT

Forty six blood culture positive cases were studied during the current outbreak of multidrug resistant typhoid fever (MRTF). The present outbreak was caused by E1 phage type and organisms were resistant to all commonly used drugs for the treatment of typhoid fever, viz., chloramphenicol (78%), co-trimoxazole (76%) and ampicillin (68%). Treatment failures with chloramphenicol (45.5%) corroborated well with in vitro resistance. No treatment failure was seen with chloramphenicol and ceftriaxone, when these drugs were used in cases infected with sensitive strains. Among the alternative drugs used in cases with in vitro sensitivity, successful clinical response was seen with ceftriaxone (4/4) and cefotaxime (8/9) as compared to cephalexin (3/5) or a combination of cephalexin and furazolidone (9/12).


Subject(s)
Ampicillin Resistance/physiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Child , Chloramphenicol Resistance/physiology , Disease Outbreaks , Drug Resistance, Microbial/physiology , Humans , India/epidemiology , Salmonella Phages/drug effects , Salmonella typhi/drug effects , Tetracycline Resistance/physiology , Trimethoprim Resistance/physiology , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/pharmacology , Typhoid Fever/drug therapy , Urban Population
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL