Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Yonsei Medical Journal ; : 994-998, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-113976

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is an important cause of nosocomial diarrhea. Diagnostic methods for detection of C. difficile infection (CDI) are shifting to molecular techniques, which are faster and more sensitive than conventional methods. Although recent advances in these methods have been made in terms of their cost-benefit, ease of use, and turnaround time, anaerobic culture remains an important method for detection of CDI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In efforts to evaluate a novel chromogenic medium for the detection of C. difficile (chromID CD agar), 289 fecal specimens were analyzed using two other culture media of blood agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose-egg yolk agar while enzyme immunosorbent assay and polymerase chain reaction-based assay were used for toxin detection. RESULTS: ChromID showed the highest detection rate among the three culture media. Both positive rate and sensitivity were higher from chromID than other culture media. ChromID was better at detecting toxin producing C. difficile at 24 h and showed the highest detection rate at both 24 h and 48 h. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous use of toxin assay and anaerobic culture has been considered as the most accurate and sensitive diagnostic approach of CDI. Utilization of a more rapid and sensitive chromogenic medium will aid in the dianogsis of CDI.


Subject(s)
Chromogenic Compounds/chemistry , Clostridioides difficile/chemistry , Culture Media/chemistry
2.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-20960

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a disease of unknown aetiology in which exacerbations are sometimes linked to intestinal colonization by toxin-producing Clostridium difficile. We undertook this study to detect and quantitatively assess C. difficile in the stool of patients with UC using real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and to compare it with healthy individuals. METHODS: A total of 37 consecutive patients with UC (26 male, mean age 41.3 yr) and 36 healthy adult volunteers (20 male, mean age 36.4), none of whom had received antibiotics within two months prior to faecal collection, were included in the study. Faecal DNA was extracted, quantitative PCR (qPCR) carried out using primers to amplify species-specific segments of 16S rDNA of C. difficile, and expressed as relative fold difference against amplification of highly conserved (universal) segments. Toxins A and B were assayed by ELISA. RESULTS: Quantitative PCR detected C. difficile sensitively, and spiking with increasing numbers of the organism resulted in linear increase in amplification (R(2)=0.974). C. difficile was detected by qPCR in faeces of 20 of 36 healthy volunteers and 34 of 37 patients with UC. Relatively greater amplification of C. difficile (fold difference) was noted in UC compared to controls (P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in C. difficile amplification between patients with proctitis, left sided colitis and pancolitis, or between active and quiescent colitis. Toxin was detected in the faeces of 8 of 37 patients with UC compared to 2 of 36 healthy volunteers. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Findings of this study showed overgrowth of C. difficile in the stool of Indian patients with UC. However, its relevance to disease pathogenesis and severity in a tropical country like India needs to be investigated further.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Clostridioides difficile/chemistry , Colitis, Ulcerative/microbiology , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Feces/microbiology , Humans , India , Male , Middle Aged , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL