Distribution characteristics and correlation analysis of GJB2 variation in patients with auditory neuropathy / 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

Objective:To elucidate the correlation between the GJB2 gene and auditory neuropathy, aiming to provide valuable insights for genetic counseling of affected individuals and their families. Methods:The general information, audiological data（including pure tone audiometry, distorted otoacoustic emission, auditory brainstem response, electrocochlography）, imaging data and genetic test data of 117 auditory neuropathy patients, and the patients with GJB2 gene mutation were screened out for the correlation analysis of auditory neuropathy. Results:Total of 16 patients were found to have GJB2 gene mutations, all of which were pathogenic or likely pathogenic.was Among them, one patient had compound heterozygous variants GJB2[c. 427C>T][c. 358_360del], exhibiting total deafness. One was GJB2[c. 299_300delAT][c. 35_36insG]compound heterozygous variants, the audiological findings were severe hearing loss.The remaining 14 patients with GJB2 gene variants exhibited typical auditory neuropathy. Conclusion:In this study, the relationship between GJB2 gene and auditory neuropathy was preliminarily analyzed,and explained the possible pathogenic mechanism of GJB2 gene variants that may be related to auditory neuropathy.

Genetic characteristic analysis of slight-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss in children / 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

Objective:To analyze genetic factors and phenotype characteristics in pediatric population with slight-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Methods:Children with slight-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss of and their parents, enrolled from the Chinese Deafness Genome Project, were studied. Hearing levels were assessed using pure tone audiometry, behavioral audiometry, auditory steady state response（ASSR）, auditory brainstem response（ABR） thresholds, and deformed partial otoacoustic emission（DPOAE）. Classification of hearing loss is according to the 2022 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics（ACMG） Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hearing Loss. Whole exome sequencing（WES） and deafness gene Panel testing were performed on peripheral venous blood from probands and validations were performed on their parents by Sanger sequencing. Results:All 134 patients had childhood onset, exhibiting bilateral symmetrical slight-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss, as indicated by audiological examinations. Of the 134 patients, 29（21.6%） had a family history of hearing loss, and the rest were sporadic patients. Genetic causative genes were identified in 66（49.3%） patients. A total of 11 causative genes were detected, of which GJB2 was causative in 34 cases（51.5%）, STRC in 10 cases（15.1%）, MPZL2 gene in six cases（9.1%）, and USH2A in five cases（7.6%）.The most common gene detected in slight-to-moderate hearing loss was GJB2, with c. 109G>A homozygous mutation found in 16 cases（47.1%） and c. 109G>A compound heterozygous mutation in 9 cases（26.5%）. Conclusion:This study provides a crucial genetic theory reference for early screening and detection of mild to moderate hearing loss in children, highlighting the predominance of recessive inheritance and the significance of gene like GJB2, STRC, MPZL2, USH2A.

Results of combined newborn hearing and deafness gene screening in Yuncheng area of Shanxi Province / 中华医学遗传学杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To analyze the clinical significance of combined newborn hearing and deafness gene screening in Yuncheng area of Shanxi Province.@*METHODS@#Results of audiological examinations, including transient evoked otoacoustic emission and automatic discriminative auditory brainstem evoked potentials, for 6 723 newborns born in Yuncheng area from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. Those who failed one of the tests were considered to have failed the examination. A deafness-related gene testing kit was used to detect 15 hot spot variants of common deafness-associated genes in China including GJB2, SLC26A4, GJB3, and mtDNA12S rRNA. Neonates who had passed the audiological examinations and those who had not were compared using a chi-square test.@*RESULTS@#Among the 6 723 neonates, 363 (5.40%) were found to carry variants. These have included 166 cases (2.47%) with GJB2 gene variants, 136 cases (2.03%) with SLC26A4 gene variants, 26 cases (0.39%) with mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene variants, and 33 cases (0.49%) with GJB3 gene variants. Among the 6 723 neonates, 267 had failed initial hearing screening, among which 244 had accepted a re-examination, for which 14 cases (5.73%) had failed again. This has yielded an approximate prevalence of hearing disorder of 0.21% (14/6 723). Among 230 newborns who had passed the re-examination, 10 (4.34%) were found to have carried a variant. By contrast, 4 out of the 14 neonates (28.57%) who had failed the re-examination had carried a variant, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#Genetic screening can provide an effective supplement to newborn hearing screening, and the combined screening can provide a best model for the prevention of hearing loss, which can enable early detection of deafness risks, targeted prevention measures, and genetic counseling to provide accurate prognosis for the newborns.

A prospective study of genetic screening of 2 060 neonates by high-throughput sequencing / 中华医学遗传学杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To assess the value of genetic screening by high-throughput sequencing (HTS) for the early diagnosis of neonatal diseases.@*METHODS@#A total of 2 060 neonates born at Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital from March to September 2021 were selected as the study subjects. All neonates had undergone conventional tandem mass spectrometry metabolite analysis and fluorescent immunoassay analysis. HTS was carried out to detect the definite pathogenic variant sites with high-frequency of 135 disease-related genes. Candidate variants were verified by Sanger sequencing or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA).@*RESULTS@#Among the 2 060 newborns, 31 were diagnosed with genetic diseases, 557 were found to be carriers, and 1 472 were negative. Among the 31 neonates, 5 had G6PD, 19 had hereditary non-syndromic deafness due to variants of GJB2, GJB3 and MT-RNR1 genes, 2 had PAH gene variants, 1 had GAA gene variants, 1 had SMN1 gene variants, 2 had MTTL1 gene variants, and 1 had GH1 gene variants. Clinically, 1 child had Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), 1 had Glycogen storage disease II, 2 had congenital deafness, and 5 had G6PD deficiency. One mother was diagnosed with SMA. No patient was detected by conventional tandem mass spectrometry. Conventional fluorescence immunoassay had revealed 5 cases of G6PD deficiency (all positive by genetic screening) and 2 cases of hypothyroidism (identified as carriers). The most common variants identified in this region have involved DUOX2 (3.93%), ATP7B (2.48%), SLC26A4 (2.38%), GJB2 (2.33%), PAH (2.09%) and SLC22A5 genes (2.09%).@*CONCLUSION@#Neonatal genetic screening has a wide range of detection and high detection rate, which can significantly improve the efficacy of newborn screening when combined with conventional screening and facilitate secondary prevention for the affected children, diagnosis of family members and genetic counseling for the carriers.

Evaluation of electrocardiographic parameters in patients with hearing loss genotyped for the connexin 26 gene (GJB2) mutations / Avaliação dos parâmetros eletrocardiográficos em pacientes com perda auditiva genotipada para mutações do gene conexina 26 (GJB2)

Abstract Introduction: Several studies have associated congenital sensorineural hearing loss in children with prolongation of the cardiac parameter QTc. The cause of this association is unknown. At the same time, mutations in GJB2, which encodes connexin 26, are the most common cause of congenital hearing impairment. Objective: To compare electrocardiographic parameters (PR interval, QRS complex, and QTc interval) in patients with hearing loss who were tested for mutations in GJB2 and GJB6 to investigate whether these mutations affect electrical activity of the heart. Methods: 346 patients (176 males, 170 females) with sensorineural hearing loss of 30 dB HL or more, aged 21.8 ± 19.9 years (including 147 children <14 years), underwent both genetic study for GJB2 and GJB6 mutations and electrocardiography. Results: Mutations in GJB2, including homozygotes and heterozygotes, were found in 112 (32%) patients. There were no significant differences in ECG parameters between groups of patients with and without mutations in GJB2. No differences were observed either in men (mean PR with mutation: 155 ± 16.6 vs. 153.6 ± 30.1 without; QRS: 99.9 ± 9.9 vs. 101.1 ± 15.4; QTc: 414.9 ± 29.9 vs. 412.4 ± 25.7) or women (mean PR with: 148.7 ± 21 vs. 143.8 ± 22.8 without; QRS: 94.8 ± 7.6 vs. 92.9 ± 9.6; QTc: 416.8 ± 20.6 vs. 424.9 ± 22.8). In similar fashion, we did we find any significant differences between groups of children with and without GJB2 mutations (mean PR with: 126.3 ± 19.6 vs. 127 ± 19.7 without; QRS: 80.7 ± 9.5 vs. 79.4 ± 11.6; QTc: 419.7 ± 23.5 vs. 419.8 ± 24.8). Conclusion: No association was found between the presence of GJB2 mutations encoding connexin 26 in patients with hearing loss and their ECG parameters (PR, QRS, QTc).

Resumo Introdução: Vários estudos têm associado a perda auditiva neurossensorial congênita em crianças ao prolongamento do parâmetro cardíaco QTc. A causa dessa associação é desconhecida. Ao mesmo tempo, as mutações no GJB2, que codifica a conexina 26, são a causa mais comum de deficiência auditiva congênita. Objetivo: Comparar parâmetros eletrocardiográficos (intervalo PR, complexos QRS e intervalo QTc) em pacientes com perda auditiva que foram testados para mutações no GJB2 e GJB6 para investigar se essas mutações afetam a atividade elétrica do coração. Método: Foram submetidos a estudo genético para mutações de GJB2 e GJB6 e eletrocardiograma 346 pacientes (176 homens, 170 mulheres) com perda auditiva neurossensorial de 30 dB ou mais, com média de 21,8 ± 19,9 anos (incluindo 147 crianças <14 anos). Resultados: Mutações no GJB2, inclusive homozigóticos e heterozigóticos, foram encontradas em 112 (32%) pacientes. Não houve diferenças significativas nos parâmetros de ECG entre grupos de pacientes com e sem mutações no GJB2. Não foram observadas diferenças em homens (PR médio com mutação: 155 ± 16,6 vs. 153,6 ± 30,1 sem mutação; QRS: 99,9 ± 9,9 vs. 101,1 ± 15,4; QTc: 414,9 ± 29,9 vs. 412,4 ± 25,7) nem em mulheres (PR médio com: 148,7 ± 21 vs. 143,8 ± 22,8, sem; QRS: 94,8 ± 7,6 vs. 92,9 ± 9,6; QTc: 416,8 ± 20,6 vs. 424,9 ± 22,8). Da mesma forma, encontramos diferenças significativas entre os grupos de crianças com e sem mutações de GJB2 (PR médio com: 126,3 ± 19,6 vs. 127 ± 19,7, sem; QRS: 80,7 ± 9,5 vs. 79,4 ± 11,6; QTc: 419,7 ± 23,5 vs. 419,8 ± 24,8). Conclusão: Não foi encontrada associação entre a presença de mutações de GJB2 que codificam conexina 26 em pacientes com perda auditiva e seus parâmetros de ECG (PR, QRS, QTc).