ABSTRACT
Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms or DRESS Syndrome is a rare, serious and potentially fatal adverse drug reaction. It is characterized by widespread morbilliform and edematous skin lesions, associated with eosinophilia, lymphadenopathy and internal organ involvement and unusually associated with pulmonary symptoms. We report a 47-year-old male with DRESS syndrome, manifested with typical skin lesions and extensive pulmonary involvement, responding satisfactorily to systemic corticosteroids.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/chemically induced , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/pathology , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/pathology , Penicillin G Benzathine/adverse effects , Dipyrone/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/drug therapy , Antipyretics/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effectsABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: La reacción a drogas con eosinofilia y síntomas sistémicos (DRESS) es una rara enfermedad que puede ser letal. OBJETIVOS: Describir los hallazgos clínicos, de laboratorio e histopatológicos en pacientes con DRESS. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de fichas clínicas de pacientes con DRESS entre los años 2007 y 2017 con score regiSCAR mayor o igual a caso probable. RESULTADOS: Se estudiaron 24 pacientes: 14 fueron mujeres (58,3%), 2 tuvieron enfermedad autoinmune (8,3%), la edad promedio fue 45,04 años DS 17,2 (16-78). Los medicamentos frecuentemente implicados fueron Lamotrigina (33,3%) y Carbamazepina (20,8%). La latencia fue 28 días DS 17,7 (10-90). La clínica más frecuente fue prurito 87,5%, fiebre 75%, edema facial 62,5% y adenopatías 45,8%. En laboratorio lo más alterado fueron pruebas hepáticas (70,8%) y eosinofilia (45,8%). 11 pacientes (45,8%) presentaron eosinófilos en la histopatología y 21 pacientes (87,5%) fueron tratados con corticoides. La mortalidad fue 11,1% (2 pacientes, por causas distintas a DRESS). DISCUSIÓN: DRESS es una reacción adversa a medicamentos severa con variados hallazgos clínicos y analíticos que requieren de su conocimiento para no retrasar el diagnóstico y su tratamiento.
INTRODUCCIÓN: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare disease that can be lethal. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical, laboratory and histopathological findings in patients with DRESS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of clinical records of patients with DRESS between 2007 and 2017 with RegiSCAR score greater than or equal to probable case. RESULTS: 24 patients were studied: 14 were women (58.3%), 2 had autoimmune diseases (8.3%), the average age was 45.04 ± 17.2 years (16-78). The medications frequently implicated were Lamotrigine (33.3%) and Carbamazepine (20.8%). The latency was 28 ± 17.7 days (10-90). The most frequent symptoms were 87.5% pruritus, fever 75%, facial edema 62.5% and lymphadenopathies 45.8%. In the laboratory, the most disturbed were liver tests (70.8%) and eosinophilia (45.8%). 11 patients (45.8%) presented eosino-phils in histopathology and 21 patients (87.5%) were treated with corticosteroids. Mortality was 11.1% (2 patients) due to other causes than DRESS. DISCUSSION: DRESS is an adverse reaction to severe medications with a varied clinical and la-boratory finding, requiring knowledge in order to not to delay diagnosis and treatment.Key words: DRESS; Eosinophilia; ADR, Drug rash
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Young Adult , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/pathology , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/epidemiology , Autoimmune Diseases , Clinical Evolution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/complications , Eosinophilia , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/therapyABSTRACT
SUMMARY Objective: To review the hypersensitivity reaction to drugs known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS syndrome), based on a case report. We also intend to discuss the difficulty and importance of disease recognition, since none of the changes is pathognomonic of this disease and failure to identify it may have disastrous consequences for the patient. Method: To describe this case report, in addition to the information collected for clinical assessment, a literature review was performed in the PubMed and Bireme databases in order to retrieve the latest information published in literature on DRESS syndrome. Results: The case of a 20-year old patient is reported. After anamnesis, physical examination and laboratory tests a diagnosis of DRESS syndrome was performed, characterized by rash, hematologic alterations, lymphadenopathy and lesions in target organ. This is a rare syndrome, whose frequency varies according to the drug used and the immune status of the patient, being more often associated with the use of anticonvulsants. Conclusion: The approach and discussion of the topic are of paramount importance, in view of the potential lethality of this treatable syndrome. Recognizing the occurrence of DRESS syndrome and starting treatment as soon as possible is crucial to reduce the risk of mortality and improve prognosis.
RESUMO Objetivo: fazer uma revisão da reação de hipersensibilidade a drogas denominada reação a drogas com eosinofilia e sintomas sistêmicos (síndrome DRESS), com base em um relato de caso clínico. Pretende-se ainda discutir a dificuldade e importância de seu reconhecimento, uma vez que nenhuma alteração dessa doença é patognomônica e sua não identificação pode trazer consequências desastrosas para o paciente. Método: para descrever este relato, além das informações coletadas no caso clínico, uma revisão da literatura nas bases de dados PubMed e Bireme foi realizada com o intuito de rever as informações mais recentes publicadas na literatura acerca da síndrome DRESS. Resultados: relatou-se o caso de uma paciente de 20 anos de idade que, após anamnese, exame físico e exames laboratoriais, foi diagnosticada com síndrome DRESS, caracterizada por erupção cutânea, alterações hematológicas, linfonodomegalia e lesões em órgão-alvo. É uma síndrome rara, cuja frequência varia conforme a droga utilizada e o estado imunológico do indivíduo, sendo mais associada ao uso de anticonvulsivantes. Conclusão: a abordagem e discussão do tema são de extrema importância, tendo em vista o potencial de letalidade dessa síndrome, que possui tratamento. Reconhecer precocemente a DRESS e instituir terapêutica é fundamental para reduzir o risco de mortalidade e melhorar o prognóstico.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Young Adult , Eosinophilia/chemically induced , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/etiology , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/pathology , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Eosinophilia/pathology , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/pathology , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/pathology , Anticonvulsants/adverse effectsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare and potentially fatal adverse drug reaction associated with skin rash, fever, eosinophilia, and multiple organ injury. A number of pharmacological agents are known to cause DRESS syndrome such as allopurinol, anticonvulsants, vancomycin, trimethoprime-sulfamethoxazole, and pyrimethamine-sulfadiazine. Here, we describe two patients who developed DRESS syndrome during ocular treatment. The first case was being treated for late postoperative endophthalmitis with topical antibiotics, intravenous cephalothin, meropenem, and intravitreal injection of vancomycin and ceftazidime before symptoms developed. We were unable to identify the causal drug owing to the large number of medications concurrently administered. The second case presented with DRESS syndrome symptoms during ocular toxoplasmosis treatment. In this case, a clearer association with pyrimethamine-sulfadiazine was observed. As a result of the regular prescription of pharmacological agents associated with DRESS syndrome, ophthalmologists should be aware of the potentially serious complications of DRESS syndrome.
RESUMO Síndrome DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) é uma reação adversa a medicamentos rara e potencialmente fatal, associada à rash cutâneo, febre, eosinofilia e lesão de múltiplos órgãos. Algumas drogas podem desencadeá-la, como: alopurinol, anticonvulsivantes, vancomicina, sulfametoxazol-trimetoprim, sulfadiazina-pirimetamina, entre outras. Descrevemos dois casos que desenvolverem DRESS síndrome durante tratamento ocular. O primeiro caso apresentou os sintomas durante tratamento para endoftalmite pós-operatória tardia com antibióticos tópicos, cefalotina e meropenem intravenosos e injeção intravítrea de vancomicina e ceftazidima; não podemos identificar a droga causadora, pois múltiplas medicações foram utilizadas. O segundo caso desenvolveu os sintomas durante tratamento clássico para toxoplasmose ocular, então a associação com sulfadiazina-pirimetamina foi mais clara. Como muitos oftalmologistas prescrevem regularmente drogas que podem desencadear a síndrome DRESS, esse diagnóstico deve ser lembrado já que pode levar a sérias complicações.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/pathology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antiprotozoal Agents/adverse effects , Skin/pathology , Biopsy , Toxoplasmosis, Ocular/drug therapy , Endophthalmitis/drug therapy , Intravitreal Injections/adverse effects , Fever/pathologyABSTRACT
Introduction: The reported literature about the types of cutaneous adverse antibiotic reactions (ATB-CAR) and the responsible antimicrobial class is scarce. Aim: to describe the clinical and histopathological profile of these reactions, and potential associations between different types of ATB-CAR and causal antibiotic class in a tertiary hospital in Chile. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional retrospective study performed at the Hospital of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Results: A total of 58 patients were included. The most common type of ATB-CAR was morbilliform (n: 37, 63.8%). The antibiotics most frequently involved were the penicillins and cephalosporins (n: 34, 69.3%). The most common histological pattern in all types of ATB-CAR was superficial perivascular dermatitis with or without spongiosis. There was significant association between urticarial, morbilliform, DRESS and PEGA types, with the use of penicillins, cephalosporins, cotrimoxazole, and lincomycin, respectively (n: 4,100%, n: 15, 40.5%, n: 2; 50%, n: 1, 50%, p < 0.05, respectively). Discussion: This is the first description of the ATB-CAR patterns in South American hospitalized patients. Both clinical and histopathological patterns of ATB-CAR are similar to other published series, however the types of causal antibiotics are different.
Introducción: La literatura médica reportada acerca de los tipos de reacciones cutáneas adversas a antimicrobianos (ATM-cRAM) y la clase de antimicrobiano responsable es escasa. Objetivo: Describir el perfil clínico e histopatológico de estas reacciones, y establecer posibles asociaciones entre los distintos tipos de ATM-cRAM y la clase de antimicrobiano causal, en un hospital terciario en Chile. Material y Método: Estudio transversal analítico retrospectivo realizado en el Hospital de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Resultados: Fue incluido un total de 58 pacientes. El tipo más frecuente de ATM-cRAM fue el morbiliforme (n: 37; 63,8%). Los antimicrobianos más frecuentemente implicados fueron penicilinas y cefalosporinas (n: 34; 69,3%). El patrón histopatológico más frecuente en todos los tipos de ATM-cRAM fue el de dermatitis perivascular superficial, con o sin espongiosis. Hubo asociación significativa entre las ATM-cRAM tipo urticaria, morbiliforme, DRESS y PEGA, con el uso de penicilinas, cefalosporinas, cotrimoxazol y lincomicina, respectivamente (n: 4,100%; n: 15, 40,5%; n: 2; 50%; n: 1; 50%, p < 0,05, respectivamente). Discusión: Este estudio corresponde a la primera descripción de los patrones de ATM-cRAM en pacientes hospitalizados sudamericanos. Tanto los patrones clínicos como histopatológicos de ATM-cRAM son similares a otras series publicadas; sin embargo, los tipos de antimicrobianos causales no coinciden con lo previamente descrito.