La simulación puede mejorar la seguridad de los pacientes sometidos a procedimientos endoscópicos gastrointestinales bajo sedación / Simulation can improve patients’ security in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation

background: Appropriate sedation is crucial for a successful gastrointestinal endoscopy procedure (GEP); however, this is associated with adverse events, therefore adequate capacitation in this subject is mandatory. Simulation is an excellent teaching tool but its use in the setting of sedation teaching for GEP has not bee explored. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a simulation course on sedation for GEP procedures done by endoscopist. Methods: A checklist to assess the endoscopists’ sedation performance for GEP was developed. This checklist was used to assess the sedations’ quality before and after a high fidelity sedation simulation course for GEP. Differences before/after the intervention was calculated using the McNemar’s test. A p ≤ 0,05 was considered significant. Results: All participants were assessed 15 times pre and post intervention. After the simulation, there was a significant improvement in patients’ airway assessment, in the level of awareness about patients’ condition during the procedure and in the monitoring after the procedure. All participants considered simulation should be compulsory before obtaining a license to sedate patients. Conclusions: The implementation of a sedation course based on simulation cases directed to endoscopists improved patient safety and sedations’ quality during the procedure. Simulation should be considered as a valid teaching tool, which is an enormous challenge to the anaesthesiologists.

Introducción: Una adecuada sedación contribuye al éxito de un procedimiento endoscópico gastrointestinal (PEG); sin embargo, esto puede estar asociado a eventos adversos, siendo importante la capacitación al respecto. La simulación es una excelente herramienta docente, pero su uso en la enseñanza de sedación para PEG no ha sido explorada. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el impacto de un curso de sedación para PEG dirigido a endoscopistas basado en simulación. Materiales y Métodos: Se diseño una lista de cotejo para evaluar la calidad de la sedación impartida por endoscopistas durante PEG. Con dicho instrumento se determinó la calidad de la sedación antes y después de un curso de simulación de alta fidelidad sobre sedación para PEG. La magnitud de las diferencias secundario a la intervención se calcularon utilizando el test de McNemar. Una p ≤ 0,05 se consideró significativa. Resultados: Todos los participantes fueron evaluados 15 veces antes y después de la intervención. Después de la intervención, mejoró significativamente la evaluación de vía aérea, el nivel de alerta por las condiciones del paciente durante el procedimiento y el seguimiento posterior. Todos los participantes consideraron que la simulación debería ser obligatoria antes de obtener privilegios clínicos. Conclusiones: La implementación de un curso de sedación basados en simulación dirigidos a endoscopistas mejora la calidad de esta y la seguridad del paciente durante el procedimiento. La simulación debe ser considerada como una estrategia de enseñanza válida en este contexto lo que plantea un gran desafío a todos los anestesiólogos.

The Box Simulator Is Useful for Training Novice Endoscopists in Basic Endoscopic Techniques

PURPOSE: The present study was aimed at evaluating the usefulness of box simulators for training novice endoscopists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An explanation of the goals, contents, and features of the simulator was given to study participants. The participants then received "hands-on training" in gastrointestinal endoscopy techniques using a box simulator. Subsequently, they were asked to answer 19 structured questions about the simulator. Ratings were scored on a scale from 1 to 5 for questions concerning their first impression of the simulator. Questions on the usefulness of the simulator and the training course were answered as "agree", "disagree", or "no opinion". RESULTS: A total of 32 participants filled out the questionnaire. The mean scores on the simulator's usefulness, features, and realistic movements before the training were between 1.5 and 2.0. There were no significant differences between the mean values of the scores given by novice users compared to non-novice users. However, after receiving training on the simulator, 90.6% of the participants considered the box simulator a generally useful tool for learning basic endoscopic techniques, and 90.6% agreed that the simulator was useful for improving hand-eye coordination. CONCLUSION: Box simulators may be useful for training novice endoscopists in basic gastrointestinal endoscopic techniques.