Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet ; 44(9): 891-898, Sept. 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1423291

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effect of neuromodulatory drugs on the intensity of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women. Data sources: Searches were carried out in the PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, Lilacs, OpenGrey, and Clinical Trials databases. Selection of studies: The searches were carried out by two of the authors, not delimiting publication date or original language. The following descriptors were used: chronic pelvic pain in women OR endometriosis, associated with MESH/ENTREE/DeCS: gabapentinoids, gabapentin, amitriptyline, antidepressant, pregabalin, anticonvulsant, sertraline, duloxetine, nortriptyline, citalopram, imipramine, venlafaxine, neuromodulation drugs, acyclic pelvic pain, serotonin, noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants, with the Boolean operator OR. Case reports and systematic reviews were excluded. Data collection: The following data were extracted: author, year of publication, setting, type of study, sample size, intervention details, follow-up time, and results. Data synthesis: A total of 218 articles were found, with 79 being excluded because they were repeated, leaving 139 articles for analysis: 90 were excluded in the analysis of the titles, 37 after reading the abstract, and 4 after reading the articles in full, and 1 could not be found, therefore, leaving 7 articles that were included in the review. Conclusion: Most of the studies analyzed have shown pain improvement with the help of neuromodulators for chronic pain. However, no improvement was found in the study with the highest statistical power. There is still not enough evidence that neuromodulatory drugs reduce the intensity of pain in women with CPP.


Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito de drogas neuromoduladoras na intensidade da dor pélvica crônica em mulheres. Fontes de dados: As buscas foram realizadas nas bases de dados PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, Lilacs, OpenGrey e Clinical Trials. Seleção dos estudos: As buscas foram realizadas por dois dos autores, não delimitando data de publicação ou idioma de publicação. Foram usados os seguintes descritores: chronic pelvic pain in women OR endometriosis, associated with MESH/ENTREE/DeCS: gabapentinoids, gabapentin, amitriptyline, antidepressant, pregabalin, anticonvulsant, sertraline, duloxetine, nortriptyline, citalopram, imipramine, venlafaxine, neuromodulation drugs, acyclic pelvic pain, serotonin, noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors e tricyclic antidepressants, com o operador booleano OR. Relatos de caso e revisões sistemáticas foram excluídos. Coleta de dados: Foram extraídos os seguintes dados: autor, ano de publicação, local de origem, tipo de estudo, tamanho da amostra, detalhes da intervenção, tempo de seguimento e resultados. Síntese dos dados: Foram encontrados 218 artigos, sendo 79 deles excluídos por serem repetidos, restando 139 artigos para análise, dos quais 90 foram excluídos na análise dos títulos, 37 após a leitura do resumo e 4 após a leitura dos artigos na íntegra, e 1 não foi encontrado, restando, então, 7 artigos que foram incluídos na revisão. Conclusão: A maioria dos estudos analisados mostrou melhora da dor crônica com auxílio de neuromoduladores. No entanto, nenhuma melhora foi encontrada no artigo com maior poder estatístico. Ainda não há evidências suficientes de que drogas neuromoduladoras reduzam a intensidade da dor pélvica crônica em mulheres.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Behavior , Pelvic Pain , Sertraline/therapeutic use , Gabapentin/therapeutic use
2.
Rev. bras. oftalmol ; 80(3): e0005, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1280120

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of gabapentin in the management of neuropathic pain in patients with keratoconus, who were treated with fast (10 minutes) epi-off corneal crosslinking (CXL). Methods: This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. The sample comprised patients with bilateral progressive keratoconus, aged 12 years or older, who underwent a bilateral epi-off corneal CXL (fast - 10 minutes) procedure. One group was given placebo orally, and the other group received gabapentin 600 mg orally, both preoperatively. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied to record postoperative pain up to 48 hours after procedure. The study was conducted at the Belotto Stock Centro Oftalmológico, in the city of Joaçaba, Santa Catarina, Brazil, from June 2018 to September 2019. Results: At no point in the study significant differences were observed between groups, in terms of pain intensity measured by means of the VAS questionnaire, or of opioid use (Paco®), though opioid consumption was 21% lower in the group receiving gabapentin. Conclusion: We concluded gabapentin has no efficacy in postoperative pain control after epi-off corneal CXL (fast - 10 minutes). Although there was no statistically significant difference, the group that received gabapentin suffered less pain, resulting in lower opioid consumption. UTN number: U1111-1256-0330.


RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia do uso da gabapentina no manejo da dor neuropática em pacientes portadores de ceratocone submetidos ao tratamento de crosslinking corneano epi-off fast de 10 minutos. Métodos: Tratou-se de pesquisa prospectiva, duplo-cega, randomizada. A amostra foi composta de pacientes com ceratocone progressivo bilateral, a partir dos 12 anos de idade, submetidos ao procedimento de crosslinking corneano acelerado epi-off fast de 10 minutos bilateral. Um grupo recebeu placebo via oral e o outro, gabapentina 600mg, via oral, ambos no pré-operatório. A Escala Visual Analógica foi aplicada para registrar a dor pós-operatória até 48 horas após o procedimento. A pesquisa foi realizada no período de junho de 2018 a setembro de 2019 em um centro oftalmológico. Resultados: Não foram observadas diferenças estatísticas significativas para ambos os grupos, tanto na intensidade da dor medida pela Escala Visual Analógica, como na redução do uso do opioide (Paco®), em qualquer horário analisado durante um período de 48 horas. No entanto, houve redução de 21% no consumo de opioides pelo grupo que fez uso da gabapentina. Conclusão: A gabapentina não demonstrou eficácia no controle da dor no pós-operatório do crosslinking corneano epi-off fast de 10 minutos. No entanto, observou-se que, mesmo não havendo diferença estatisticamente significativa, houve diminuição da dor no grupo em que foi usada a gabapentina, resultando na redução do consumo de opioides. Número UTN: U1111-1256-0330.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Cross-Linking Reagents/therapeutic use , Keratoconus/therapy , Riboflavin/therapeutic use , Ultraviolet Rays , Pain Measurement , Double-Blind Method , Administration, Oral , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Collagen/metabolism , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Cornea/metabolism , Eye Pain/drug therapy , Gabapentin/administration & dosage , Gabapentin/therapeutic use , Analgesics/therapeutic use
3.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, CONASS, ColecionaSUS, SES-GO | ID: biblio-1358039

ABSTRACT

Tecnologia: Pregabalina, drogas não-opioides disponíveis no SUS, treinamento físico no solo ou em meio aquático. Indicação: Tratamento da fibromialgia. Pergunta: Há diferenças de eficácia e segurança entre a Pregabalina e as outras drogas não opioides ou terapias disponíveis no SUS para tratamento da dor crônica relacionada à fibromialgia? Métodos: Levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado nas bases eletrônicas PUBMED e Cochrane Database, seguindo estratégias de buscas predefinidas, com busca adicional na página eletrônica da Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias em Saúde. Avaliou-se a qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas com Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews versão 2 (AMSTAR-II). Resultados: Foram selecionadas e incluídas 6 revisões sistemáticas. Conclusão: A afirmação de eficácia da Gabapentina, Amitriptilina e Memantina para tratamento da fibromialgia é pouco confiável, pois as evidências são de nível 3, provenientes de ensaios clínicos de baixa qualidade metodológica. Pregabalina é eficaz para reduzir a dor em curto prazo (risco absoluto é 50%, nível 1 de evidência), mas não em longo prazo. O treinamento físico, relatado como única estratégia eficaz para tratamento da fibromialgia nas diretrizes do SUS, não tem efeito clinicamente importante sobre a dor


Technology: Pregabalin, non-opioid drugs available in Brazilian Public Health System, aquatic exercise or exercise on land. Indication: Treatment of fibromyalgia. Question: Are there differences in efficacy and safety between Pregabalin and other non-opioid drugs or therapies available in the SUS for the treatment of chronic pain related to fibromyalgia? Methods: A bibliographic survey was carried out in the electronic databases PUBMED and Cochrane Database, following pre-defined search strategies, with an additional search on the website of the National Commission for the Incorporation of Health Technologies. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was evaluated with Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews version 2 (AMSTAR-II). Results: Six systematic reviews were selected and included. Conclusion: There is not confidence about effectiveness of Gabapentin, Amitriptyline and Memantine for fibromyalgia treatment (level 3 of evidence, from clinical trials of low methodological quality). Pregabalin, in the short term, is effective for reducing pain (absolut risk is 50%, level 1 of evidence), but not in the long term. Physical training, reported as the only effective strategy for treating fibromyalgia in Brazilian Public Health System guidelines, has no clinically important effect on pain.


Subject(s)
Humans , Exercise , Memantine/therapeutic use , Fibromyalgia/drug therapy , Pregabalin/therapeutic use , Gabapentin/therapeutic use , Amitriptyline/therapeutic use , Efficacy , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
4.
Dolor ; 30(72): 20-24, nov. 2020.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1362442

ABSTRACT

El síndrome de dolor crónico postmastectomía es frecuente en pacientes sometidas a cirugía por cáncer de mamas, llegando a ser invalidante en casos severos. Existen distintos factores de riesgo para que éste se presente, siendo el dolor agudo postoperatorio el único en el cual podemos intervenir. La importancia de implementar estrategias de prevención en el periodo perioperatorio es fundamental. En la mantención de la anestesia general, la utilización de propofol se asocia con menor incidencia de dolor agudo postoperatorio. El uso de anestésicos locales, ya sea por vía tópica, subcutánea y sistémica, ha demostrado su beneficio para disminuir el dolor agudo. No obstante, solo el uso tópico y endovenoso ha sido útil para reducir el dolor hasta 3 meses postcirugía. Técnicas de analgesia regional, como el bloqueo PEC I y II, bloqueo paravertebral y bloqueo del erector de la espina han demostrado ser útiles para reducir el dolor agudo; pero solo el bloqueo paravertebral ha demostrado su utilidad en reducir el dolor hasta 1 año postcirugía. El uso de gabapentina, pregabalina y ketamina desde el periodo preoperatorio disminuyen la incidencia de dolor agudo postoperatorio. En tanto, la venlafaxina y dexmedetomidina demostraron su utilidad para reducir el dolor crónico.


Postmastectomy chronic pain syndrome is common in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer, becoming invalidating in severe cases. There are different risk factors for this to occur, with acute post-operative pain being the only one in which we can intervene. The importance of implementing prevention strategies in the perioperative period is essential. In the maintenance of general anesthesia, the use of propofol is associated with a lower incidence of acute post-operative pain. The use of local anesthetics, whether topically, subcutaneously and systemically, has shown its benefit in reducing acute pain. However, only topical and endovenous use has been useful to reduce pain up to 3 months after surgery. Regional analgesia techniques, such as PEC I and II block, paravertebral block, and spinal erector block have been shown to reduce acute pain; but only the paravertebral block has shown its usefulness in reducing pain up to 1 year after surgery. The use of gabapentin, pregabalin and ketamine from the preoperative period reduce the incidence of acute postoperative pain. Meanwhile, venlafaxine and dexmedetomidine proved useful in reducing chronic pain.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Chronic Pain/prevention & control , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Mastectomy/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Propofol/therapeutic use , Dexmedetomidine/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/etiology , Pregabalin/therapeutic use , Gabapentin/therapeutic use , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Anesthetics, Local
6.
Rev. cuba. anestesiol. reanim ; 18(2): e550, mayo.-ago. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1093106

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El dolor posoperatorio en la cirugía de tórax y hemiabdomen superior tiene un fuerte componente neuropático, por ello se le asocia con evolución hacia el dolor crónico. Sobre esta base se aplican los anticonvulsivantes como parte del tratamiento multimodal. Objetivos: Evaluar la efectividad analgésica y seguridad de la gabapentina en el tratamiento del dolor tras cirugía de tórax y abdomen superior. Método: Se realizó un estudio causiexperimental, comparativo y prospectivo con los pacientes anunciados para cirugía de abdomen superior y tórax, en el periodo de 2015 a 2017. Se incluyeron 30 pacientes divididos en 2 grupos. El grupo Grupo G: (n=14) recibió tratamiento con gabapentina 100 mg vía oral el día antes de la intervención y cada 12 h en el posoperatorio hasta las 24 h. El Grupo C: (n=16) recibió la analgesia convencional pautada para este tipo de intervención. Resultados: La muestra fue homogénea para la edad y el sexo. Los niveles de intensidad del dolor fueron menores en el grupo de gabapentina y esta diferencia se hace más significativa a las 24 h de la cirugía. Ello se corresponde con menor necesidad de analgesia de rescate (71 por ciento vs 100 por ciento). Las complicaciones asociadas resultaron más frecuentes en el grupo estudio a expensas de las náuseas, aunque sin diferencias significativas. Conclusiones: El empleo de gabapentina en el perioperatorio garantiza mejor control del dolor con escasas complicaciones(AU)


Introduction: Post-operative pain in upper thorax and hemiabdomen surgery has a solid neuropathic component; it is therefore associated with evolution towards chronic pain. On this basis, anticonvulsants are applied as part of the multimodal treatment. Objectives: To evaluate analgesic effectiveness and safety of gabapentin for management of pain after thorax and upper abdomen surgery. Method: A quasiexperimental, comparative and prospective study was conducted with the patients announced for surgery of the upper abdomen and thorax, in the period from 2015 to 2017. Thirty patients divided into 2 groups were included. The Group G (n=14) received treatment with gabapentin 100 mg orally the day before the intervention and every 12 h in the postoperative period until 24 h. The Group C (n=16) received the conventional analgesia prescribed for this type of intervention. Results: The sample was homogeneous regarding age and sex. Pain intensity levels were lower in the gabapentin group and this difference becomes more significant 24 hours after surgery. This corresponds to a lower need for rescue analgesia (71 percent vs. 100 percent). Associated complications were more frequent in the study group at the expense of nausea, although there were no significant differences. Conclusions: The use of gabapentin in the perioperative period guarantees better pain control with few complications(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Gabapentin/therapeutic use , Abdomen/surgery , Prospective Studies , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/methods
7.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Clín. Méd ; 17(2): 110-112, abr.-jun. 2019. ilus., tab.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1026531

ABSTRACT

A vasculopatia livedoide é uma doença rara caracterizada pela oclusão da microvasculatura da derme, originando lesões maculosas que, posteriormente, podem evoluir para úlceras e cicatrizes atróficas. Como um fenômeno vaso-oclusivo, o tratamento geralmente é realizado com antiplaquetários e fibrinolíticos. O presente relato descreve o caso de uma paciente refratária à terapia convencional, que obteve regressão da doença utilizando a rivaroxabana, um fármaco inibidor seletivo do fator Xa. (AU)


Livedoid vasculopathy is a rare disease characterized by occlusion of the dermis microvasculature, leading to spotted lesions that can later develop into ulcers and atrophic scars. As a vaso- occlusive phenomenon, treatment is usually performed with antiplatelet and fibrinolytic agents. The present report describes the case of a female patient refractory to conventional therapy who presented disease remission using rivaroxaban, a selective factor Xa inhibitor drug. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Skin Diseases, Vascular/drug therapy , Thrombotic Microangiopathies/drug therapy , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Livedoid Vasculopathy , Paresthesia , Pentoxifylline/therapeutic use , Polyneuropathies/diagnosis , Thrombosis/complications , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Biopsy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Nifedipine/therapeutic use , Fibromyalgia , Skin Diseases, Vascular/complications , Skin Diseases, Vascular/diagnosis , Connective Tissue Diseases/complications , Lower Extremity/injuries , Electromyography , Thrombotic Microangiopathies/complications , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Foot/pathology , Diverticular Diseases , Smokers , Gabapentin/therapeutic use , Analgesics/therapeutic use
8.
Rev. medica electron ; 41(2): 445-453, mar.-abr. 2019.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1004280

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN La tos crónica en los adultos puede ser causada por muchas causas, existen cuatro principales: el síndrome de tos de la vía aérea superior, enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico, reflujo laringofaríngeo, asma bronquial, y bronquitis eosinofílica no asmática. Todos los pacientes deben evaluarse clínicamente con espirometria, y comenzar con tratamiento empírico. Otras causas potenciales incluyen el uso de inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de la angiotensina, cambios medioambientales, uso del tabaco, enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, y la apnea obstructiva del sueño. La radiografía del tórax puede orientar hacia causas infecciosas, inflamatorias, y malignas. Los pacientes con tos crónica refractaria pueden remitirse a la consulta especializada de un neumólogo u otorrinolaringólogo, además de un ensayo terapéutico con gabapentin, pregabalin, y psicoterapia.


ABSTRACT Although chronic cough in adults can be caused by many etiologies, four conditions account for most cases: upper airway cough syndrome, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, also known as laryngo- pharyngeal reflux disease, bronchial asthma, and non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis. All patients should be evaluated clinically with spirometry, and empiric treatment should be initiated. Other potential causes include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use, environmental triggers, tobacco use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. Chest radiography can rule out concerning infectious, inflammatory, and malignant thoracic conditions. Patients with refractory chronic cough should be referred to a pulmonologist or otolaryngologist in addition to a therapeutic trial of gabapentin, pregabalin, and psychotherapy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Cough/diagnosis , Cough/etiology , Cough/psychology , Cough/drug therapy , Cough/therapy , Cough/epidemiology , Asthma/diagnosis , Bronchitis/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pregabalin/therapeutic use , Gabapentin/therapeutic use
9.
Rev. bras. oftalmol ; 77(2): 95-97, mar.-abr. 2018. graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-899119

ABSTRACT

Resumo Neste artigo descrevemos como conduzimos com sucesso um caso de úlcera neurotrófica não responsivo à terapia convencional com o uso de lente de contato escleral e as vantagens desta terapêutica.


Abstract In this paper we describe how we successfully conducted a case of neurotrophic ulcer not responsive to conventional therapy using scleral contact lens and the advantages of this therapy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Corneal Ulcer/therapy , Contact Lenses , Ophthalmoscopy , Sclera , Tobramycin/therapeutic use , Trigeminal Nerve/physiopathology , Vitamin A/therapeutic use , Wound Healing , Ofloxacin/therapeutic use , Visual Acuity , Corneal Ulcer/diagnosis , Corneal Ulcer/etiology , Doxycycline/therapeutic use , Prosthesis Fitting , Cornea/innervation , Trigeminal Nerve Diseases/complications , Lubricant Eye Drops , Slit Lamp Microscopy , Gabapentin/therapeutic use , Saline Solution/therapeutic use , Hypesthesia
10.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; 67(3): 294-304, Mar.-June 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-843394

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objectives: Sternotomy for cardiac surgeries causes significant postoperative pain and when not properly managed may cause significant morbidity. As neuropathic pain is a significant component here, gabapentin and pregabalin may be effective in these patients and may reduce postoperative opioid consumption. The purpose of this systematic review was to find out efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin in acute postoperative pain after cardiac surgery. Methods: Published prospective human randomized clinical trials, which compared preoperative and/or postoperative gabapentin/pregabalin with placebo or no treatment for postoperative pain management after cardiac surgery has been included in this review. Results: Four RCTs each for gabapentin and pregabalin have been included in this systematic review. Three gabapentin and two pregabalin studies reported decrease in opioid consumption in cardiac surgical patients while one gabapentin and two pregabalin studies did not. Three RCTs each for gabapentin and pregabalin reported lower pain scores both during activity and rest. The drugs are not associated with any significant complications. Conclusion: Despite lower pain scores in the postoperative period, there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine use of gabapentin and pregabalin to reduce opioid consumption in the cardiac surgical patients.


Resumo Objetivos: A esternotomia para cirurgias cardíacas causa dor intensa no pós-operatório e quando não tratada adequadamente pode causar morbidade grave. Como nesse caso a dor neuropática é uma componente importante, gabapentina e pregabalina podem ser eficazes nesses pacientes e podem reduzir o consumo de opioides no pós-operatório. O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi avaliar a eficácia de gabapentina e pregabalina na dor aguda após cirurgia cardíaca. Métodos: Foram incluídos nesta revisão estudos clínicos prospectivos e randômicos com humanos, que compararam o uso de gabapentina/pregabalina nos períodos pré- e/ou pós-operatório com placebo ou nenhum tratamento para o controle da dor no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca. Resultados: Quatro ECRs de gabapentina e pregabalina foram incluídos nesta revisão sistemática. Três estudos de gabapentina e dois de pregabalina relataram diminuição do consumo de opioides em pacientes cirúrgicos cardíacos; um estudo de gabapentina e dois de pregabalina não relataram. Três ECRs de gabapentina e pregabalina relataram escores menores de dor, durante a atividade e o repouso. Os medicamentos não estão associados a complicações significativas. Conclusão: Embora os escores de dor tenham sido menores no pós-operatório, não há evidências suficientes para recomendar o uso rotineiro de gabapentina e pregabalina para reduzir o consumo de opioides em pacientes cirúrgicos cardíacos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Sternotomy , Pregabalin/therapeutic use , Gabapentin/therapeutic use , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL