ABSTRACT
O artigo trata da questão dos biobancos para pesquisa e dos aspectos jurídicos relacionados à proteção de dados genéticos dos sujeitos de pesquisa. Mais especificamente, além da definição de biobancos e dados genéticos, analisa-se os dados genéticos e testes genéticos e a relação médico-sujeito de pesquisa, bem como a proteção criminal da intimidade genética, sugerindo-se a criação de uma lei que regulamente a coleta, o acesso, a utilização e o armazenamento dos dados genéticos a fim de prevenir testes genéticos para fins médicos arbitrários (AU)
The article deals with the issue of biobanks for research and legal aspects related to the protection of genetic data of study subjects. More specifically, besides the definition of biobanks and genetic data, we analyze genetic data and genetic testing and the physician-subject relationship in research, as well as criminal protection of genetic privacy, suggesting the creation of a law that regulates the collection, access, use and storage of genetic data to prevent genetic testing for arbitrary medical purposes (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Genetic Testing/legislation & jurisprudence , Genetic Privacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Databases, Genetic/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
The finished version of the human genome sequence was completed in 2003, and this event initiated a revolution in medical practice, which is usually referred to as the age of genomic or personalized medicine. Genomic medicine aims to be predictive, personalized, preventive, and also participative (4Ps). It offers a new approach to several pathological conditions, although its impact so far has been more evident in mendelian diseases. This article briefly reviews the potential advantages of this approach, and also some issues that may arise in the attempt to apply the accumulated knowledge from genomic medicine to clinical practice in emerging countries. The advantages of applying genomic medicine into clinical practice are obvious, enabling prediction, prevention, and early diagnosis and treatment of several genetic disorders. However, there are also some issues, such as those related to: (a) the need for approval of a law equivalent to the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, which was approved in 2008 in the USA; (b) the need for private and public funding for genetics and genomics; (c) the need for development of innovative healthcare systems that may substantially cut costs (e.g. costs of periodic medical followup); (d) the need for new graduate and postgraduate curricula in which genomic medicine is emphasized; and (e) the need to adequately inform the population and possible consumers of genetic testing, with reference to the basic aspects of genomic medicine.