ABSTRACT
Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ionizing radiation from high energy X-ray on fluoride release, surface roughness, flexural strength, and surface chemical composition of the materials. The study groups comprised five different restorative materials: Beautifil II, GCP Glass Fill, Amalgomer CR, Zirconomer, and Fuji IX GP. Twenty disk-shaped specimens (8x2 mm) for fluoride release and 20 bar-shaped specimens (25 x 2x 2 mm) for flexural strength were prepared from each material. Each material group was divided into two subgroups: irradiated (IR) and non-irradiated (Non-IR). The specimens from IR groups were irradiated with 1.8 Gy/day for 39 days (total IR = 70.2 Gy). The amount of fluoride released into deionized water was measured using a fluoride ion-selective electrode and ion analyzer after 24 hours and on days 2, 3, 7, 15, 21, 28, 35, and 39 (n = 10). The flexural strength was evaluated using the three-point bending test (n = 10). After the period of measurement of fluoride release, seven specimens (n = 7) from each group were randomly selected to evaluate surface roughness using AFM and one specimen was randomly selected for the SEM and EDS analyses. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p = 0.05). The irradiation significantly increased fluoride release and surface roughness for Amalgomer CR and Zirconomer groups (p < 0.05). No significant change in flexural strength of the materials was observed after irradiation (p > 0.05). The ionizing radiation altered the amount of fluoride release and surface roughness of only Amalgomer CR and Zirconomer. The effect could be related to the chemical compositions of materials.
Subject(s)
Apatites/radiation effects , Radiation, Ionizing , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/radiation effects , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Fluorides/chemistry , Glass Ionomer Cements/radiation effects , Apatites/chemistry , Reference Values , Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Zirconium/radiation effects , Zirconium/chemistry , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Statistics, Nonparametric , Composite Resins/chemistry , Flexural Strength , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistryABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the impact of radiotherapy on enamel around restorations of glass ionomer cement (GIC) and fluoride tooth paste (FTP). Material and Methods: Eighty enamel blocks were made and randomly distributed into two groups, according to the fluoride therapy, non-fluoride tooth paste (NFTP) and FTP (n=40) and in subgroups in conformity with radiation dose (0, 10, 30 and 60 Gy). Roughness and microhardness enamel analyses were conducted before radiotherapy. Enamel cavities were made and restored with two GIC (Ketac Molar Easy Mix or Vitremer). Enamel blocks were submitted to 10, 30 and 60 Gy. Then, artificial enamel caries lesions were created by a pH-cycling procedure and FTP or NFTP were used as treatment. The restored enamel blocks were submitted to final roughness and microhardness analyses. Roughness increase (ΔR) and hardness loss (ΔH) values of enamel were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey test (p=0.05). Results: The irradiated enamel group showed statistically higher ΔR (0.44 ±0.2) and ΔH (99.26±7.0) values compared to non-irradiated group (ΔR = 0.051±0.02; ΔH=66.16±12.7) when a resin-modified GIC and NFTP were used. Conclusion: Higher radiation dose increased dissolution of bovine enamel. The use of GIC associated with FTP decreased roughness and increased enamel hardness after radiotherapy.
Subject(s)
Radiotherapy/methods , Tooth Remineralization/adverse effects , In Vitro Techniques/methods , Dental Enamel , Glass Ionomer Cements/radiation effects , Brazil , Analysis of Variance , Hardness Tests/methodsABSTRACT
This study evaluated the effects of the photoactivation source and restorative material on the development of caries-like lesions on human enamel after an in vitro pH challenge. Enamel cavities were prepared in 36 blocks, which were assigned to two groups according to the restorative material: resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and composite resin (CR). Samples were exposed to quartz-tungsten-halogen lamp, argon-ion laser, or light-emitting diode (n = 6). The Knoop microhardness (KHN) values of the top surface of all materials were evaluated. Restored enamel blocks were thermocycled and subjected to 10 demineralization-remineralization cycles at 37°C. KHN analysis of the superficial enamel was performed by four indentations located 100 mm from the restoration margin. The material KHN was not affected by the photoactivation source. No significant difference in KHN was noted between CR and RMGI. The enamel surface around RMGI exhibited a higher KHN (272.8 KHN) than the enamel around CR (93.3 KHN), regardless of the photoactivation source. Enamel demineralization around the dental restoration was not influenced by the photoactivation source. Less enamel demineralization was observed around the RMGI than around the CR restoration.
Subject(s)
Humans , Curing Lights, Dental , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Dental Enamel/radiation effects , Glass Ionomer Cements/radiation effects , Tooth Demineralization/etiology , Analysis of Variance , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Hardness Tests , Materials Testing , Photochemical Processes , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Aim: This study compared the microleakage of light cure glass ionomer and flowable compomer as pit and fissure sealant, with and without tooth preparation. Materials and Methods: One hundred premolars that were extracted for orthodontic purpose were used. After adequate storage and surface debridement, the teeth were randomly divided into four groups. In Group I and III, the occlusal surfaces were left intact, while in Group II and Group IV, tooth surfaces were prepared. Teeth in Group I and Group II were sealed with Light cure glass ionomer, whereas flowable compomer was used to seal teeth in Group III and IV. The sealed teeth were then immersed in dye. Subsequently, buccolingual sections were made and each section was examined under stereomicroscope for microleakage followed by scoring. Results: In group I, microleakage score ranged from 2 to 4 with mean of 3.64 (±0.757), while in group II the range was observed to be 1-4 with mean of 2.88 (±1.236). Group III recorded a range of 0-4 with the mean of 2.20 (±1.443) while 0-2 and 0.60 (±0.707) being the range and mean observed, respectively, for group IV. Conclusion: Flowable compomer placed after tooth preparation showed better penetration and less marginal leakage than the light cure glass ionomer.
Subject(s)
Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Coloring Agents/diagnosis , Compomers/chemistry , Compomers/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental , Dental Leakage/classification , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Glass Ionomer Cements/radiation effects , Humans , Materials Testing , Methylene Blue/diagnosis , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Pit and Fissure Sealants/chemistry , Pit and Fissure Sealants/radiation effects , Resin Cements/chemistry , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Resins, Synthetic/chemistry , Resins, Synthetic/radiation effects , Temperature , Time Factors , Tooth Preparation/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the microhardness of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RMGICs) photoactivated with a blue light-emitting diode (LED) curing light. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty specimens were distributed in 3 groups: Fuji II LC Improved/GC (RM1), Vitremer/3M ESPE (RM2) and Filtek Z250/ 3M ESPE (RM3). Two commercial light-curing units were used to polymerize the materials: LED/Ultrablue IS and a halogen light/XL3000 (QTH). After 24 h, Knoop microhardness test was performed. Data were submitted to three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at a pre-set alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: At the top surface, no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) in the microhardness was seen when the LED and QTH lights were used for all materials. At the bottom surface, microhardness mean value of RM2 was significantly higher when the QTH light was used (p<0.05). For RM1, statistically significant higher values (p<0.05) were seen when the LED light was used. No statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was seen at the bottom surface for RM3, irrespective of the light used. Top-to-bottom surface comparison showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) for both RMGICs, regardless of the light used. For RM3, microhardness mean value at the top was significantly higher (p<0.05) than bottom microhardness when both curing units were used. CONCLUSION: The microhardness values seen when a LED light was used varied depending on the restorative material tested.
Subject(s)
Curing Lights, Dental , Glass Ionomer Cements/radiation effects , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Halogens , Hardness , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives , Materials Testing , Resins, Synthetic/radiation effects , Semiconductors , Surface PropertiesABSTRACT
The Light Emitting Diodes (LED) technology has been used to photoactivate composite resins and there is a great number of published studies in this area. However, there are no studies regarding resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RMGIC), which also need photoactivation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate water sorption of two RMGIC photoactivated with LED and to compare this property to that obtained with a halogen light curing unit. A resin composite was used as control. Five specimens of 15.0 mm in diameter x 1.0 mm in height were prepared for each combination of material (Fuji II LC Improved, Vitremer, and Filtek Z250) and curing unit (Radii and Optilight Plus) and transferred to desiccators until a constant mass was obtained. Then the specimens were immersed into deionized water for 7 days, weighed and reconditioned to a constant mass in desiccators. Water sorption was calculated based on weight and volume of specimens. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05). Specimens photocured with LED presented significantly more water sorption than those photocured with halogen light. The RMGIC absorbed statistically significant more water than the resin composite. The type of light curing unit affected water sorption characteristics of the RMGIC.
A tecnologia baseada em Diodos emissores de luz (LED) tem sido utilizada para a fotoativação de resinas compostas e existe um grande número de estudos publicados a este respeito. Entretanto, não existem estudos envolvendo cimentos de ionômero de vidro modificados por resina (CIVMR), que também necessitam fotoativação. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi o de avaliar a sorção de água de dois CIVMR fotoativados com LED e comparar essa propriedade com aquela obtida com unidade com lâmpada halógena. Uma resina composta foi utilizada como controle. Cinco espécimes com 15,0 mm diâmetro x 1,0 mm de altura foram preparados para cada combinação de material (Fuji II LC Improved, Vitremer e Filtek Z250) e fonte de luz (Radii e Optilight Plus) e transferidos a dessecadores até a obtenção de massa constante. Em seguida, os espécimes foram imersos em água deionizada por 7 dias, pesados e recondicionados a uma massa constante em dessecadores. A sorção de água foi calculada com base no peso e no volume dos espécimes. Os dados foram analisados por ANOVA a dois critérios e teste de Tukey (p < 0,05). Os espécimes fotoativados com LED apresentaram maior sorção de água que os fotoativados com lâmpada halógena. Os CIVMR absorveram mais água que a resina composta. O tipo de unidade de fotoativação afetou as características de sorção de água dos CIVMR.
Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Light , Water , Absorption , Analysis of Variance , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Glass Ionomer Cements/radiation effects , Halogens , Materials Testing , SpectrophotometryABSTRACT
Radiopacidade é uma das propriedades físicas requeridas para os cimentos endodônticos pela qual se avalia o preenchimento do sistema de canais radiculares. Rotineiramente utiliza-se o fotodensitômetro para a leitura de densidades em filmes radiográficos. A finalidade deste trabalho foi utilizar o sistema de imagem digital DIGORA, para determinar a radiopacidade de cinco cimentos endodônticos. Confeccionou-se 12 corpos de prova de 1,5 mm de espessura e 5 de diâmetro dos cimentos com e sem cones de guta-percha, e três fragmentos de dentina, que foram radiografados no sensor do Digora em 3 aparelhos de raios x: Dabi 50kV/4mAs, Siemens 60kV/3mAs e Dabi 70kV/2mAs, a uma distância de 40 cm. Após a leitura da placa de imagem no escaner a laser, o software do Digora 5.1 determinou a radiopacidade das áreas padronizadas fornecendo a média e o desvio-padräo da densidade radiográfica (níveis de cinza). Com os valores obtidos, a ordem dos cimentos do mais radiopaco para o memos foi: Vidrion, N-Rickert, Sealer 26, Endomethasone e Sealapex. Nos cimentos Sealer 26, Endomethasone e Sealapex a adiçäo de guta-percha aumentou a radiopacidade (em torno de 12 por cento), enquanto que nos outros dois houve a diminuiçäo (em torno de 4 por cento). A densidade radiográfica com 50 kV foi mais alta que com 60 e 70 kV devido a menor discriminaçäo dos níveis de cinza nesta quilovoltagem
Subject(s)
Root Canal Filling Materials/classification , Root Canal Filling Materials/radiation effects , Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement/radiation effects , Glass Ionomer Cements/radiation effects , Contrast Media/chemistry , Endodontics , Calcium Hydroxide/radiation effects , Radiography, Dental, Digital/classification , Radiography, Dental, Digital/methodsABSTRACT
Baseado na necessidade da reavaliaçäo de procedimentos clínicos empregando novas técnicas e equipamentos, esse experimento tem por objetivo observar os efeitos da irradiaçäo laser sobre a permeabilidade dentinária e marginal da superfície apical de dentes apicectomizados e retroobturados. Caninos permanentes, extraídos, tratados endodonticamente, tiveram os três milímetros finais das raízes seccionados, obedecendo o angulo de 180º onde foram preparadas cavidades para as obturaçöes retrógadas. os espécimes foram divididos em vinte e um grupos experimentais obedecendo aos seguintes critérios: tipo de material retroobturador - amálgama de prata, ionômero de vidro e resina fotopolimerizável - tipo de laser - Nd: YAG, CO² e Argônio - e momento da irradiaçäo - antes ou depois da retroobturaçäo...