Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 9(2): 115-119, Apr.-June 2010. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-578074

ABSTRACT

Aim: To test the hypothesis that gold-coated orthodontic accessories used for canine traction are less cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel. Methods: Six different orthodontic accessories were evaluated, three of them made from stainless steel (1 – bracket, 2 – button, 3 – mesh pad) and three made from a gold-coated alloy (4 – small mesh pad, 5 button, 6 – big mesh pad). Three control groups were also analyzed: Positive control (C+), consisting of Tween 80 cell detergent;Negative control (C-), consisting of PBS; and Cell control (CC), consisting of cells not exposed to any material. Dye-uptake technique, in which neutral red dye is incorporated into viable cells, was used to assess the cytotoxicity of the accessories. Viable cell counting was performed using a spectrophotometer. Data were analyzed statistically by A NOVA and Tukey’s test. Results:Statistically significant differences (P< 0.05) were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups 4-6. However, no differences were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups C- and CC, and neither between Groups 4-6 and Group C+. Conclusions: The tested hypothesis was not confirmed since gold-coated orthodontic accessories were found to be more cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel.


Subject(s)
Humans , Stainless Steel/toxicity , Fibroblasts/metabolism , Gold Alloys/toxicity , Culture Media/analysis , Orthodontic Appliances , Tooth, Impacted , Analysis of Variance , Cuspid , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Spectrophotometers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL