Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
2.
Acta Medica Iranica. 2008; 46 (3): 256-268
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-85608

ABSTRACT

In the present health care environment, cost-benefit analysis is extremely important. In this screening program, the minimal cost of screening dipstick urinalysis in 1601 asymptomatic school children was determined. The process of screening was similar to all the studies. The minimal cost utilizing 3 general physicians was calculated. Costs were determined by using current charge for supplies ordered to perform tests, charges for tests performed by a commercial laboratory, and the cost of a final evaluation by a pediatric nephrologist. Initial abnormal urinalysis was found in 4.7% [76/1601] of patients. Upon retesting 1.37% [22/1601] of patients were calculated to have a persistent abnormality. The calculated cost was 1/530/000 Rials [164.5 $] to initially screen all 1601 patients with a dipstick urinalysis or 850 Rials [0.09 $] per patient. The calculated cost to evaluate the 22 patients with any persistent abnormality on repeat dipstick urinalysis was 246/840 Rials [26.5 $] or 11.220 Rials [1.2 $] per patient. This is the calculated cost for a single screening of 1601 asymptomatic pediatric patients. Multiple screening dipstick urinalysis in asymptomatic pediatric are costly and should be discontinued. We purpose that a single screening dipstick urinalysis be obtained at school entry age, between 6 and 7 years old, in all asymptomatic children


Subject(s)
Humans , Urinalysis/instrumentation , Urinalysis/standards , Urinalysis/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/standards , Health Care Surveys/economics , Health Care Surveys/standards , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening , Mass Screening/standards , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data
3.
Gac. méd. boliv ; 28(1): 9-9, 2005.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-411910

ABSTRACT

Es un trabajo prospectivo en un periodo de 6 meses. El objetivo principal es conocer la percepcion del paciente respeto a la calidad que ofrece el Hospital Clinico VIEDMA, en la ciudad de Cohabamba. Se realizaron 1200 encuestas distribuidas en los diferentes Consultorios Medicos, Servicios Auxiliares y de Diagnostico. Los resultados mostraron que en general los usuarios se encuentran satisfechos con el servicio otorgado, llegando a promedios de mas del 80 porciento; algunas espeialidades y consultorios, incluso superan este porcentaje. Sin embargo este promedio puedes ser menor uando se trato otorgado y la perepcion del tratamiento recibido en algunos consultorios, llegando a influir en el resultado final de la encuest. Este trabajo servira para iniciarirulos de calidad


Subject(s)
Quality of Health Care/classification , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality of Health Care/standards , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Information Management , Patient Care/classification , Patient Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care/history , Patient Care/standards , Health Care Surveys/classification , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Surveys/methods , Health Care Surveys/standards
4.
Cuad. Hosp. Clín ; 46(1): 72-78, 2000.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-313619

ABSTRACT

Propuesta para la aplicaicon, análisis ye valuación de encuestas de opinion de los usuarios sonbre los servicios prestados en los hospitales como herramienta pa la mejora continua de la claidad


Subject(s)
Health Care Surveys/classification , Health Care Surveys/methods , Health Care Surveys/standards , Data Collection/classification , Data Collection/instrumentation , Data Collection/methods , Data Collection/standards , Hospitals
5.
Prensa méd. argent ; 86(7): 657-62, sept. 1999. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-242301

ABSTRACT

Cuantificar prácticas preventivas realizadas en CEMIC Saavedra, ver si existe diferencia en éstas entre aquellos pacientes que poseen o no médico de cabecera. Encuestas autoadministradas a una muestra de conveniencia, realizadas a afiliados que concurrieron en forma programada y no programada a consultorios externos de todas las especialidades existentes en el Centro. Se obtuvieron 154 encuestas de pacientes de ambos sexos mayores de 17 años. Se realizan menos prácticas preventivas que las recomendadas internacionalmente en la población estudiada. Los pacientes que poseen médico de cabecera y éste es clínico o médico de familia, tienen realizadas más prácticas preventivas que el resto


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Preventive Medicine , Preventive Medicine/education , Preventive Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Surveys/methods , Health Care Surveys/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL