A Comparison of the Operative Techniques and the Postoperative Complications for Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Implantation

Abstract Introduction Bone anchored hearing aids (BAHA) represent a useful surgical option for patients with single sided deafness. Objectives To compare multiple techniques for BAHA implantation regarding postoperative complications, operative time, and duration between the surgery and the first use of the BAHA. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of all patients receiving implantation of a BAHA from August of 2008 to October of 2014. Data collected included: patient age, gender, side operated, abutment length, operative time, duration until first use of the BAHA, operative technique, and postoperative complications. The statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey pairwise comparison, chi-square, and paired t-test. Statistical significance was determined using a level of p< 0.05. Results A total of 88 patients (43 female and 45 male) were included in the data analysis. A total of 80 complications were documented, and these complications were classified according to the Holgers criteria. A significant difference in the total postoperative complications existed between the six techniques used (ANOVA; p< 0.01). In addition, there was also a significant difference among the six techniques employed regarding the operative time (ANOVA; p< 0.01). The average time duration until fitting of the BAHA processor among the various techniques trended toward but did not reach statistical significance (ANOVA; p= 0.16). Conclusions Significant differences in the operative outcomes exist among the various techniques for BAHA implantation. Based on the statistical analysis of our data, the BAHA Attract system (Cochlear Ltd., Sidney, Australia) requires greater operative time, but it is associated with less postoperative complications than percutaneous techniques and its processor may be fitted significantly sooner.

Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation / Preservação auditiva e implante coclear de acordo com a abordagem da orelha interna: avaliação multicêntrica

INTRODUCTION: Electroacoustic stimulation is an excellent option for people with residual hearing in the low frequencies, who obtain insufficient benefit with hearing aids. To be effective, the subject's residual hearing should be preserved during cochlear implant surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the hearing preservation in patients that underwent implant placement and to compare the results in accordance with the approach to the inner ear. METHODS: 19 subjects underwent a soft surgical technique, and the electrode MED-EL FLEX(tm) EAS, designed to be atraumatic, was used. We evaluated pre- and postoperative tonal audiometric tests with an average of 18.4 months after implantation, to measure the rate of hearing preservation. RESULTS: 17 patients had total or partial preservation of residual hearing; 5 had total hearing preservation and two individuals had no preservation of hearing. The insertion of the electrode occurred through a cochleostomy in 3 patients, and in 2 of these there was no hearing preservation; the other 16 patients experienced electrode insertion through a round window approach. All patients benefited from the cochlear implant, even those who are only using electrical stimulation. CONCLUSION: The hearing preservation occurred in 89.4% of cases. There was no significant difference between the forms of inner ear approach. .

INTRODUÇÃO: A estimulação eletroacústica é uma excelente opção para pessoas com audição residual nas baixas frequências, que obtêm benefício insuficiente com aparelhos auditivos. Para ser eficaz, a audição residual deve ser preservada durante a cirurgia de implante coclear. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a preservação auditiva de pacientes implantados e comparar os resultados de acordo com a abordagem da orelha interna. MÉTODO: 19 indivíduos foram implantados com uma técnica cirúrgica para preservação auditiva, tendo sido utilizado o eletrodo MED-EL FLEXTM EAS, concebido para ser atraumático. Foram avaliados os exames audiométricos tonais no pré e pós-operatório, com uma média de 18,4 meses após o implante para medir a taxa de preservação da audição residual. RESULTADOS: 17 pacientes tiveram preservação total ou parcial da audição residual; cinco obtiveram preservação da audição total e dois indivíduos não tiveram preservação da audição. A inserção do eletrodo ocorreu por cocleostomia em 3 pacientes; em 2 destes pacientes não houve preservação da audição. Os outros 16 pacientes foram submetidos à abordagem pela janela redonda. Todos os pacientes foram beneficiados com o implante coclear, mesmo aqueles pacientes que utilizando apenas estimulação elétrica. CONCLUSÃO: A preservação auditiva ocorreu em 89,4% dos casos. Não houve diferença significativa entre as formas de abordagem da orelha interna. .