ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Herpes zoster has been widely described in the context of different systemic autoimmune diseases but not dermatomyositis/polymyositis. Therefore, we analyzed the prevalence, risk factors and herpes zoster outcomes in this population. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study of herpes zoster infections in dermatomyositis/polymyositis patients was performed. The patients were followed at a tertiary center from 1991 to 2012. For the control group, each patient with herpes zoster was paired with two patients without herpes zoster. Patients were matched by gender and the type of myositis, age at myositis onset and disease duration. RESULTS: Of 230 patients, 24 (10.4%) had a histories of herpes zoster (19 with dermatomyositis and five with polymyositis, two-thirds female). The mean age of the patients with herpes zoster was 44.6±16.8 years. No difference between the groups was found regarding cumulative clinical manifestations. Disease activity, autoantibody, muscle and leukogram parameters were also comparable between the groups. No differences in immunosuppressive (alone or in association with other immunosuppressive therapies) or glucocorticoid (current use, medium dose and cumulative dose in the last two months) therapies were found between patients with and without herpes zoster. However, a higher proportion of patients in the herpes zoster group received chloroquine diphosphate compared to the control group. All of the patients received acyclovir; 58.3% of patients had postherpetic neuralgia and no cases of recurrence were reported. Furthermore, individuals who were taking high prednisone doses at the time of the herpes zoster diagnosis had reduced levels of postherpetic neuralgia. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that chloroquine diphosphate could predispose patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis to developing herpes zoster, particularly women and dermatomyositis patients. .
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Chloroquine/analogs & derivatives , Dermatomyositis/drug therapy , Herpes Zoster/chemically induced , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Chloroquine/adverse effects , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Dermatomyositis/complications , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Data is scarce regarding adverse events (AE) of biological therapy used in the management of Crohn's Disease (CD) among Brazilian patients. OBJECTIVES: To analyse AE prevalence and profile in patients with CD treated with Infliximab (IFX) or Adalimumab (ADA) and to verify whether there are differences between the two drugs. METHOD: Retrospective observational single-centre study of CD patients on biological therapy. Variables analysed: Demographic data, Montreal classification, biological agent administered, treatment duration, presence and type of AE and the need for treatment interruption. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were analysed, 25 treated with ADA and 24 with IFX. The groups were homogeneous in relation to the variables studied. The average follow-up period for the group treated with ADA was 19.3 months and 21.8 months for the IFX group (p = 0.585). Overall, 40% (n = 10) of patients taking ADA had AE compared with 50% (n = 12) of IFX users (p = 0.571). There was a tendency towards higher incidence of cutaneous and infusion reactions in the IFX group and higher incidence of infections in the ADA treated group, although without significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found in the AE prevalence and profile between ADA and IFX CD patients in the population studied. (AU)
INTRODUÇÃO: Há poucos dados sobre os eventos adversos (EA) da terapia biológica usada no tratamento da doença de Crohn (DC) entre os pacientes brasileiros. OBJETIVOS: Analisar a prevalência dos EA e o perfil dos pacientes com DC tratados com Infliximabe (IFX) ou Adalimumabe (ADA) e verificar se há diferenças entre esses dois fármacos. MÉTODO: Estudo observacional e retrospectivo de pacientes com DC em terapia biológica, realizado em centro único. As variáveis analisadas foram: dados demográficos, classificação de Montreal, agente biológico administrado, duração do tratamento, presença e tipo de EA e necessidade de interrupção do tratamento. RESULTADOS: Quarenta e nove pacientes foram analisados, 25 tratados com ADA e 24 com IFX. Os grupos eram homogêneos em relação às variáveis estudadas. O período médio de acompanhamento foi de 19,3 meses para o grupo tratado com ADA e de 21,8 meses para o grupo tratado com IFX (p = 0,585). No total, 40% dos pacientes (n = 10) que receberam ADA tiveram AE, em comparação com 50% dos pacientes (n = 12) que receberam IFX (p = 0,571). Houve uma maior incidência de reação cutânea e à infusão no grupo IFX e de infecções no grupo ADA, embora sem diferença significativa. CONCLUSÃO: Não houve diferença na prevalência de EA e no perfil dos pacientes com DC que receberam ADA e IFX. (AU)