Indications and complications prevention and management of phaseⅡ implantation of Provox Vega voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy / 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

Objective: To explore the indications and management of common postoperative complications of phase II tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) for Provox Vega voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. Methods: The clinical data of 20 patients undergoing phase II TEP for Provox Vega voice prosthesis in our hospital between May 2021 and January 2022 were analyzed. Among them, there were 19 males and 1 female, aged from 37 to 76 years, with an average age of (60.0±8.4)years. The surgical indications and the prevention and treatment of common postoperative complications were summarized. Descriptive analysis was used in this research. Results: The basic surgical indications were as following: after total laryngectomy, there was no stenosis of the stoma and esophagus entrance, no scar constitution, no mouth opening restriction, no stiffness and backward restraint of the neck after radiotherapy, and more than half a year apart surgery or radiotherapy. Among the 20 patients, 18 underwent implantation successfuly, 1 failed in the operation, and for 1 patient, the prosthesis was removed due to bleeding 1 week after implantation. The common postoperative complications included TEP fistula infection (2 cases), the TEP fistula bleeding(1 case), deep neck (prevertebral) abscess (1 case), granulation at the inner side of the TEP fistula (1 case), invagination of the prosthesis (2 cases) and leakage around the prosthesis (2 cases). All patients were cured with different interventions. Conclusions: The Provox Vega voice prosthesis is generally safe for phase Ⅱ implantatione, but implantation indications need to be established. Common postoperative complications can be solved through preventive and remedial interventions.

Current status and future prospects in prosthetic voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy.

Total laryngectomy or laryngopharyngectomy remains the procedure of choice for advanced-stage (UICC T3 and T4) laryngeal carcinoma around the world despite advances in conservative laryngeal surgery and radiotherapy. However, it has profound effects on respiration and deglutition, in addition to the most disabling effect-the loss of verbal communication. Successful voice restoration can be attained with any of three speech options, namely esophageal speech, electrolarynx, and tracheoesophageal (TO) speech using an artificial valve. Although, no single method is considered the best for every patient, the tracheoesophageal puncture has become the preferred method in the past decade. Several types of voice prostheses have been produced since the first prosthesis was introduced in 1980 by Blom and Singer. However, eventually all prostheses are confronted by the same problem, i.e., the development of a biofilm, leading to deterioration and ultimately to dysfunction of the prostheses, necessitating replacement. This article attempts to sum up the historical background as well as the current state of surgical voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy; we review the recent major advances as well as the future prospects. Data was collected by conducting a computer-aided search of the MEDLINE and PubMed databases, supplemented by hand searches of key journals. Over 50 articles published in the last three decades on the topic have been reviewed, out of which about 20 were found to be of relevance for this article.

Voice Restoration with Low Pressure Blom Singer Voice Prosthesis after Total Laryngectomy

The main problem after total laryngectomy is permanent loss of voice. Current methods of vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy include development of esophageal speech, use of artificial larynx, tracheoesophageal shunt operations and more recently surgical restoration of the voice with prosthesis. Primary voice restoration using Blom- Singer voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy and pharyngeal myotomy was performed in 187 patients between October 1992 and July 2000. There were 184 male and 3 female patients of average age 63.7 years (range 42-76). Mean follow up period was 62 months. Satisfactory speech was achieved in 156 patients (83.5%). During the follow-up period, we experienced complaints of insufficient voice in 31 (16.5%) patients, due to partial spasm in 17 and total spasm in the pharyngoesophageal segment in 14. Furthermore, 24 (12.8%) patients preferred esophageal speech or electro larynx because of low socioeconomic level. The overall success rate was 70.7%. In this study the results of the surgical technique and prosthesis insertion, as well as the associated complications and socioeconomic levels of the patients, are discussed.