Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 24(5): 441-8, 1991. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-99475

ABSTRACT

Since dot-ELISA has recently been reported to be a sensitive, simple and method, we have compared it with the conventional microplate ELISA method. Sera of 124 leprosy patients, 136 household and professional contacts, and 92 controls were tested for a antibodies against a Mycobacterium leprae antigen using dot-ELISA on nitrocellulose membrane filters and microplate ELISA. The sensitive of the techniques was similar for multibacillary patients, but dot-ELISA was less sensitive for paucibacillary patients although it was more specific (100%) than ELISA (93,4%). Of 21 household contacts that gave a response by ELISA, 3 were also positive by dot-ELISA; one of these 3 developed indeterminate leprosy 12 months later and the other was diagnosed as borderline lepromatous after 28 months. These data indicate that dot-ELISA has a high spedificity and can be a useful tool in field evaluation


Subject(s)
Humans , Antigens, Bacterial/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Glycolipids/immunology , Immunoblotting/methods , Immunoglobulin M/analysis , Leprosy/diagnosis , Leprosy, Borderline/diagnosis , Leprosy, Borderline/immunology , Leprosy, Borderline/transmission , Leprosy, Lepromatous/diagnosis , Leprosy, Lepromatous/immunology , Leprosy, Lepromatous/transmission , Leprosy, Tuberculoid/diagnosis , Leprosy, Tuberculoid/immunology , Leprosy, Tuberculoid/transmission , Leprosy/immunology , Leprosy/transmission , Predictive Value of Tests , Skin/immunology
2.
Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz ; 82(supl.2): 153-157, 1987. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-623777

ABSTRACT

We showed that a large fraction of lepromatous patients do harbor helper-type circulating T-cells that can be activated in vitro by Mycobacterium leprae. M. leprae and PPD triggered T-cell lines could be then obtained from both tuberculoid and lepromatous patients. The proliferative response of these helper T-cells is predominantly directed against epitopes shared by several species of mycobacteria, in lepromatous patients as well as in tuberculoid patients, but species specific T-cells are also present. When presented in the context of M. leprae, these cross reactive epitopes usually fail to stimulate the T-cell lines of lepromatous patients, because of the contamination of the lines by supressor T-cells actavable by M. leprae. In one lepromatous patient, PPD and M. leprae reactive T-cell lines and clones (of the CD4 phenotype), exhibited a strong cytotoxic activity to autologous target cells coated with antigen: the relevance of this phenomenon to the pathophysiology of lepromatous leprosy remains however unknown.


Subject(s)
Humans , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Leprosy, Tuberculoid/prevention & control , Leprosy, Tuberculoid/transmission , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antigens
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL