Prognostic importance of harvested lymph node number, metastatic lymph node number, and lymph node ratio in surgically managed laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma / Importância prognóstica do número de linfonodos coletados, número de linfonodos metastáticos e relação de linfonodos em carcinoma espinocelular de laringe tratado cirurgicamente

Abstract Introduction Lymph node metastasis is a well-known prognostic factor for laryngeal carcinoma. However, current nodal staging systems provide limited information regarding prognosis. Additional parameters should be considered to improve prognostic capacity. Objectives To assess the prognostic values of metastatic lymph node number, ipsilateral/contralateral harvested lymph nodes, and lymph node ratio in patients undergoing surgical treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods Seventy-four patients diagnosed with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma primarily managed surgically were included in this study. The patients' pathological and survival data were obtained from their medical records. The effects of harvested lymph nodes and lymph node ratio on disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed. Results Ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral evaluations of harvested lymph nodes showed no significant associations with prognosis. Lymph node ratio was significantly associated with overall survival when evaluated bilaterally. Metastatic lymph node number showed more suitable stratification than TNM classification. Conclusions Metastatic lymph node number and bilateral lymph node ratio parameters should be taken into consideration to improve the prognostic capacity of TNM.

Resumo Introdução A metástase linfonodal é um fator prognóstico bem conhecido para o carcinoma de laringe. Entretanto, os sistemas atuais de estadiamento nodal fornecem informações limitadas sobre o prognóstico. Parâmetros adicionais devem ser considerados para melhorar a capacidade prognóstica. Objetivos Avaliar os valores prognósticos do número de linfonodos metastáticos, linfonodos ipsilaterais /contralaterais coletados e relação de linfonodos em pacientes submetidos ao tratamento cirúrgico do carcinoma espinocelular da laringe. Método Foram incluídos neste estudo 75 pacientes com diagnóstico de carcinoma espinocelular da laringe, tratados primariamente por meio de cirurgia. Os dados histopatológicos e de sobrevida dos pacientes foram obtidos de seus prontuários médicos. Foram analisados os efeitos dos linfonodos coletados e da relação de linfonodos na sobrevida livre de doença, sobrevida doença-específica e sobrevida global. Resultados As avaliações ipsilateral, contralateral e bilateral dos linfonodos coletados não mostraram associações significativas com o prognóstico. A relação de linfonodos foi significantemente associada à sobrevida global quando avaliada bilateralmente. O número de linfonodos metastáticos mostrou estratificação mais adequada do que a classificação TNM-N. Conclusões Os parâmetros número de linfonodos metastáticos e relação de linfonodos bilateral devem ser levados em consideração para melhorar a capacidade prognóstica da classificação TNM.

Survival analysis of different methods for classification of lymph node metastases in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma / Análise de sobrevida com diferentes métodos de classificação de metástases em linfonodos em pacientes com carcinoma espinocelular oral

Introdução: Apesar dos avanços no estadiamento clínico do carcinoma espinocelular (CEC) oral a partir de sua extensão pelo sistema TNM, ainda há necessidade de métodos que classifiquem melhor a doença para predizer o prognóstico e indicar terapia adjuvante. Objetivos: Analisar a influência do número de linfonodos positivos (PN), razão de linfonodos (LNR) e probabilidade log de linfonodos positivos (LODDS) na sobrevida de pacientes com CEC de boca. Pacientes e Métodos: Dados clínico-patológicos de pacientes com CEC de boca tratados com fins curativos por cirurgia e esvaziamento cervical (ND) associado ou não a terapias adjuvantes de 1991 a 2015 foram avaliados retrospectivamente. O impacto do PN, LNR, LODDS e outras variáveis na sobrevida global (OS) e sobrevida livre de doença (DFS) foi avaliado por meio de análises univariada e multivariada. Resultados: Cento e dezenove pacientes foram incluídos neste estudo. Na análise univariada, o PN teve um impacto significativo na OS (p = 0,001) e DFS (p = 0,020), e o LNR teve um impacto estatisticamente significante na OS (p = 0,042). Na análise multivariada com outras variáveis clínicopatológicas relevantes, o PN foi o único fator significativamente independente com influência na OS (p = 0,017), mas não na DFS (p = 0,096). Conclusões: O estudo sugere que a NP é um indicador prognóstico independente para OS e DFS em pacientes com CEC de boca e tem o potencial de complementar a classificação AJCC (2017). O LNR tem potencial para ser um importante indicador prognóstico, mas os métodos para essa classificação requerem mais estudos. O LODDS não demonstrou potencial prognóstico(AU)

Background: Despite the advances in the classification of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) based on its extension by the TNM system, there is still a need for methods to better segregate the patients to predict prognosis and indicate adjuvant therapy. Objectives: To analyze the influence of the number of positive lymph nodes (PN), lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in survival of patients with OSCC Methods: Clinicopathologic data from patients with OSCC who were treated with curative purposes by surgery and neck dissection (ND) with or without subsequent adjuvant therapies from 1991 to 2015 was retrospectively assessed. The impact of the PN, LNR, LODDS, and other variables on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: One hundred nineteen patients were included in this study. In the univariate analysis the PN had a significant impact on OS (p=0.001) and DFS (p=0.020), and the LNR had a significant impact on the OS (p=0.042). In the multivariate analysis with other relevant clinicopathologic variables, the PN was the only significantly independent factor influencing in the OS (p=0.017) but not in DFS (p=0.096). Conclusions: The PN is an independent prognostic indicator for OS and DFS in patients with OSCC and has the potential to aggregate the current AJCC classification. The LNR has potential to be an important prognostic indicator, but the methods for this classification require lapidation. The LODDS did not demonstrate prognostic potential(AU)

Cociente ganglionar como factor pronóstico de sobrevida. Recurrencia en carcinoma escamoso de cavidad oral / NODAL RATIO AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR OF SURVIVAL AND RECURRENCE IN ORAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

Antecedentes: El carcinoma escamoso de cavidad oral constituye una de las patologías de mayor frecuencia en cabeza y cuello. El tratamiento de elección es quirúrgico con altas tasas de control local. Sin embrago, se evidencian recidivas aún en etapas tempranas de la enfermedad, lo que lleva a la necesidad de identificar factores pronósticos confiables para mejorar la estadificación, tratamiento y seguimiento. El Cociente Ganglionar fue ratificado como herramienta pronóstica en otros tumores y validado en cavidad oral en un estudio multicéntrico dirigido por el Memorial Sloan Kettering Center de Nueva York. Objetivo: Validar en nuestro medio al Cociente ganglionar como factor pronóstico de sobrevida y recurrencia en carcinoma de cavidad oral. Lugar de aplicación: Hospital público de atención terciaria de tumores. Diseño: Cohorte Retrospectivo Institucional. Material y Métodos: Se recabó de manera retrospectiva información de historias clínicas, partes quirúrgicos e informes de anatomía patológica de un total de 92 pacientes. Se incluyeron aquellos con carcinoma escamoso de cavidad oral T 1-4 pN0-pN+ (pN1-2). Se calculó la sobrevida utilizando el método Kaplan-Meier y se realizó el análisis multivariado. Resultados: Un Cociente Ganglionar (CG.) mayor a 5% resultó estadísticamente significativo como factor pronóstico de sobrevida [HR 5,22(IC95% 1,86; 14;62) (p 0.002)] y recurrencia [HR 13.33 (IC95% 3.85; 46.16) No se evidenció diferencia pronóstica entre aquellos pacientes con vaciamientos pN0 y pN+ asociado a CG. menor a 5%. Pacientes pN1 y vaciamientos con recuento ganglionar total de 20 (1/20) podrían obtener un similar pronóstico al de pN0. Conclusiones: Fue posible ratificar al CG. como factor pronóstico y se plantea la posible utilidad del mismo en la indicación del tratamiento adyuvante

Background: Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma is one of the most common pathologies in head and neck surgery. Surgery is the treatment of choice with high rates of locoregional control. However, recurrences are seen even in early stages of the disease. This explains the need of new prognostic factors to provide a better staging, treatment and follow up. Nodal Ratio has been validated as a prognostic tool in other tumors and in oral cavity in a multicentric study by Memorial Sloan Kettering Center of Nueva York. Objective: To validate the Nodal Ratio as a prognostic factor in terms of survival and recurrence in oral cavity carcinoma in our medium. Design: Institutional retrospective cohort. Setting: Tertiary Public Hospital for treatment of tumours. Population and Methods: We retrospectively review 92 patient´s information from clinic histories, surgical protocols and pathologic informs. Inclusion criteria were squamous cell histopathology, T1-4 and pN0-N+ (pN1-2) stage. We calculate survival with Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis was done to determinate the independence value. Results: A Nodal Ratio higher than 5% was statistically significant as a prognostic factor of survival [HR 5,22(IC95% 1,86; 14;62) (p 0.002)] and recurrence [HR 13.33 (IC95% 3.85; 46.16) There was no prognostic difference between patients with pN0 dissections and those with pN+ dissections plus NR less than 5%. pN1 patients with nodal yields of 20 (1/20) or more could have the same forecast as a pN0. Conclusions: We were able to validate NR as a prognostic factor. We postulate the potential use in the indication of adjuvant therapy.

Positive lymph node ratio ≥0.16 is an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer / 南方医科大学学报

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the value of positive lymph node ratio (LNR) in predicting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer.@*METHODS@#We retrieved the data of a total of 862 patients with esophageal cancer with complete clinical pathology data archived in SEER database in 2010 to 2015. The best cutoff point of LNR was selected using X-tile software. Univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazard models were used to assess the value of LNR in predicting the prognosis of patients after propensity score matching (PSM).@*RESULTS@#The best cut-off point of LNR determined using X-tile 3.6.1 software was 0.16. The patients with LNR < 0.16 and those with LNR≥0.16 showed significant differences in the number of positive lymph nodes, pathological type, T stage and M stage. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the two groups showed no significant difference in the clinical data or pathological parameters. Matched univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses showed that LNR, primary tumor site and M staging were all independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients, and among them LNR had the most significant predictive value (LNR < 0.16 LNR≥0.16: HR=1.827, 95% : 1.140-2.929; =0.000). The median survival time of patients with LNR < 0.16 was 31 months (95%: 22.556-39.444 months), as compared with 16 months (95%: 12.989-19.011) in patient with LNR≥0.16 (Log Rank χ=27.392, < 0.0001). LNR had a better accuracy than N stage for assessing the patients' prognosis with an area under the ROC curve of 0.617 (95%: 0.567-0.666), as compared with 0.515 (95%: 0.463-0.565) of N stage (=3.008, =0.0026).@*CONCLUSIONS@#LNR≥0.16 is an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer and has better prognostic value than N stage.

Prognostic impact of the lymph node metastatic ratio on 5-year survival of patients with rectal cancer not submitted to preoperative chemoradiation

Lymph node metastases are a major prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Inadequate lymph node resection is related to shorter survival. The lymph nodes ratio (LNR) has been used as a prognostic factor in patients with colon cancer. Few studies have evaluated the impact of LNR on the 5-year survival of patients with rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of LNR on the survival of patients with rectal cancer not submitted to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Ninety patients with rectal cancer excluding colon tumors, synchronous tumors, hereditary colorectal cancer and those undergoing preoperative chemoradiation. The patients were divided into three groups according t < 0.05). RESULTS: The 5-year survival was related to the Dukes classification, TNM, number of metastatic lymph nodes and LNR. A difference was observed in 5-year survival between the different classes of LNR. Patients classified as LNR-0 had a survival rate of 85%, while classes LNR-1 and LNR-2, 73 and 19%, respectively (p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the LNR has an impact on 5-year survival of patients with rectal cancer not submitted to neoadjuvant therapy. (AU)

Metástases linfonodais representam um dos principais fatores prognósticos no câncer colorretal. A ressecção linfonodal inadequada relaciona-se à menor sobrevida. A proporção entre linfonodos metastáticos (PLM) vem sendo utilizada como fator prognóstico em doentes com câncer de cólon. Poucos estudos avaliaram o impacto da PLM na sobrevida de doentes com câncer retal. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o impacto da PLM na sobrevida de doentes com câncer de reto não submetidos à quimioradioterapia pré-operatória. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos 90 doentes com adenocarcinoma retal excluindo-se tumores de cólon, tumores sincrônicos, câncer colorretal hereditário e aqueles submetidos a tratamento radioquimioterápico pré-operatório. Os doentes foram divididos em três grupos segundo a PLM: PLM-0, sem linfonodos comprometidos; PLM-1, 1 a 20% dos linfonodos comprometidos; e PLM-2, mais de 21% dos linfonodos comprometidos. A identificação do ponto de corte da amostra selecionada foi obtida a partir da curva de características de operação do receptor (curva ROC). A sobrevida foi avaliada pelo teste de Kaplan-Meier, a diferença entre os grupos pelo teste de Cox-Mantel e a correlação entre as variáveis pelo teste de Pearson, adotando-se um nível de significância de 5% (p<0,05). RESULTADOS: A sobrevida em cinco anos relacionou-se à classificação de Dukes, TNM, número de linfonodos metastáticos e PLM. Houve diferença na sobrevida ao compararem-se as diferentes classes de PLM. Doentes classificados como PLM-0 apresentaram sobrevida de 85%, enquanto os pertencentes às classes PLM-1 e PLM-2, de 73 e 19%, respectivamente (p=0,0001). CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados encontrados mostraram que a PLM tem impacto na sobrevida de doentes com câncer de reto não submetidos à neoadjuvância. (AU)