Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Rev. bras. cir. plást ; 30(2): 182-189, 2015. tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1000

ABSTRACT

Introdução: A reconstrução da mama imediata pós-mastectomia, com implante de silicone é um método simples, porém, pode evoluir com complicações e remoção do implante. O objetivo do estudo foi analisar as complicações pós-operatórias e buscar relação entre estas e a remoção do implante. Método: No período de 4 anos, foram estudados retrospectivamente 323 casos de reconstrução de mama imediata com implante de silicone após mastectomia total realizados no Institut Gustave-Roussy, França. Resultados: A complicação mais frequente foi a linfocele (34,9%), seguida da necrose cutânea com 22,9%, da infecção com 19,3% e do hematoma, com 13,3% dos casos. A remoção do implante foi mais frequente quando ocorreu algum tipo de complicação cirúrgica e maior quando ocorreu mais de um tipo de complicação. A complicação mais frequente nos casos de remoção do implante foi a infecção (75,0%). O expansor foi o implante que mais teve relação com remoção do implante. O uso de implantes de volume acima de 300 ml teve significativamente mais risco de remoção do implante. Conclusões: 1) A presença de complicação pós-operatória foi fator de risco para a remoção do implante. 2) O risco de remoção foi maior na presença de mais de um tipo de complicação 3) A infecção foi o principal tipo de complicação que se relacionou com a remoção 4) O expansor apresentou maior risco de complicações e de remoção do implante. 5) A utilização de implantes de volume maior do que 300 ml apresentou maior risco de remoção.


Introduction: Immediate breast reconstruction with silicone implants following mastectomy is a simple method, but can develop complications culminating in implant removal. The aim of this study was to analyze postoperative complications and evaluate their correlation with implant removal. Method: In a period of 4 years, 323 cases of immediate breast reconstruction with silicone implants following total mastectomy were retrospectively studied in the Institut Gustave-Roussy, France. Results: The most frequent complication was lymphocele (34.9%), followed by cutaneous necrosis (22.9%), infection (19.3%), and hematoma (13.3%). Implant removal was more frequent when a surgical complication occurred, and even more frequent when there was more than one type of complication. The most frequent complication leading to implant removal was infection (75.0%). The expander was the implant that had the highest correlation with implant removal. The use of implants with a volume greater than 300 ml was associated with a significantly higher risk of implant removal. Conclusions: 1) The presence of postoperative complications was a risk factor for implant removal. 2) The risk of removal was higher when more than one complication was present. 3) Infection was the main type of complication associated with implant removal. 4) The expander presented a higher risk of complications and implant removal. 5) The use of implants with a volume greater than 300 ml had a greater risk of need for removal.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , History, 21st Century , Postoperative Complications , Prostheses and Implants , Skin Neoplasms , Lymphocele , Retrospective Studies , Mammaplasty , Breast Implants , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Evaluation Study , Mammary Glands, Human , Necrosis , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prostheses and Implants/adverse effects , Prostheses and Implants/standards , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/complications , Breast , Breast/surgery , Lymphocele/surgery , Lymphocele/complications , Lymphocele/pathology , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Mammaplasty/methods , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Mammary Glands, Human/surgery , Necrosis/surgery , Necrosis/pathology
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 35(2): 164-170, Mar.-Apr. 2009. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-516958

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment of symptomatic pelvic lymphoceles (SPL) after performing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLA) simultaneously. MATERIAL AND METHODS:We analyzed, in a retrospective study, 250 patients who underwent RRP with PLA simultaneously. Only patients with SPL were treated using different non- and invasive procedures such as percutaneous aspiration, percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) with or without sclerotherapy, laparoscopic lymphocelectomy (LL) and open marsupialization (OM). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (21 percent) had postoperative subclinical pelvic lymphoceles. Thirty patients (12 percent) developed SPL. Fifteen patients with noninfected uniloculated lymphocele (NUL) healed spontaneously after performing PCD. The remaining seven patients required sclerotherapy with additional doxycycline. After performing PCD, NUL healed better and faster than noninfected multiloculated lymphocele (NML) (success rate: 80 percent vs. 16 percent, respectively). Twenty-seven percent of patients treated initially with PCD, with or without sclerotherapy had persistent lymphocele. All patients were successfully treated with LL. Only one patient had an abscess as a major complication of a persistent SPL after PCD and sclerotherapy and was treated via an open laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic NUL can be treated using PCD with or without sclerotherapy. If this therapy fails as first-line treatment, laparoscopic lymphocelectomy should be considered within a short period of time in order to achieve successful treatment. NML should be treated using a laparoscopic approach in centers where this type of expertise is available. Infected lymphoceles are drained externally. In these cases, percutaneous or open external drainage with adequate antibiotic coverage is preferable.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Drainage/methods , Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects , Lymphocele/therapy , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Sclerotherapy , Follow-Up Studies , Laparoscopy , Lymphocele/etiology , Lymphocele/pathology , Pelvis , Postoperative Period , Prostatectomy/methods , Retrospective Studies
3.
Bol. Asoc. Méd. P. R ; 83(8): 340-2, ago. 1991. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-108084

ABSTRACT

This article presents a case of a young, otherwise asymptomatic male patient with a parotid gland enlargement. The initial clinical history did not reveal any risk factors related with HIV infection. A fine needle aspiration biopsy of the lesion showed a benign cystic lymphoepithelial lesion of the parotid gland. This once unusual lesion of the salivary gland has been recently associated with infection by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and is presently encountered with increased frequency in the clinical practice. The knowledge of the association between these two entities led, in this case, to the diagnosis of HIV infection in an otherwise asymptomatic patient. Early detection of HIV infection is of vital importance since it has been demonstrated that prompt treatment of these patients with AZT slows down the progression of the disease


Subject(s)
Parotid Diseases/diagnosis , Lymphocele/diagnosis , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/diagnosis , Biopsy, Needle , Parotid Diseases/complications , Parotid Diseases/pathology , Parotid Gland/pathology , Parotid Gland , Lymphocele/complications , Lymphocele/pathology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/complications , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL