Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 33(5): 448-453, Sept.-Oct. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-977448

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: Cardiac arrhythmias are a common challenge following open-heart surgeries. Hypomagnesemia is believed to be correlated with this condition. Prophylactic intravenous magnesium supplementation has been practiced for a long time in patients undergoing CABG. This study was designed in an attempt to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous routes in the prevention of hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia. Methods: In this interventional clinical study, 82 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. All patients were evaluated for baseline serum magnesium level and arrhythmias. One group received 1,600 mg of oral magnesium hydroxide through nasogastric (NG) tube prior to surgery, while the other group received 2 g of magnesium sulfate during the induction of anesthesia. The serum magnesium level was monitored for 48 hours after the operation. The difference in preoperative hypomagnesemia was non-significant (Sig: 0.576). Results: During the operation, the serum magnesium level peaked around 4 mg/dL, and no hypomagnesemia was detected in any patient. Although the curve of oral group declined parallel and below that of intravenous (IV) group, no significant differences were detected during postoperative monitoring. In addition, a prevalence of arrhythmia of 13.9% and 6.5% was noticed in IV and oral groups, respectively (OR: 0.428). Conclusion: Providing 1,600 mg of oral magnesium supplement to patients is as effective as 2,000 mg of magnesium sulfate IV in preventing hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia after CABG. Thus, the authors introduce this treatment regimen as a promising and cost-effective method.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Magnesium/administration & dosage , Magnesium/blood , Magnesium Hydroxide/administration & dosage , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Time Factors , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Administration, Intravenous , Magnesium Sulfate/administration & dosage
2.
Gut and Liver ; : 547-555, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-149093

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cholecystectomy is necessary for the treatment of symptomatic or complicated gallbladder (GB) stones, but oral litholysis with bile acids is an attractive alternative therapeutic option for asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of magnesium trihydrate of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) on gallstone dissolution and to investigate improvements in gallstone-related symptoms. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, phase 4 clinical study to determine the efficacy of orally administered magnesium trihydrate of UDCA and CDCA was performed from January 2011 to June 2013. The inclusion criteria were GB stone diameter or =50%, radiolucency on plain X-ray, and asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients. The patients were prescribed one capsule of magnesium trihydrate of UDCA and CDCA at breakfast and two capsules at bedtime for 6 months. The dissolution rate, response rate, and change in symptom score were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 237 subjects were enrolled, and 195 subjects completed the treatment. The dissolution rate was 45.1% and the response rate was 47.2% (92/195) after 6 months of administration of magnesium trihydrate of UDCA and CDCA. Only the stone diameter was significantly associated with the response rate. Both the symptom score and the number of patients with symptoms significantly decreased regardless of stone dissolution. Adverse events necessitating discontinuation of the drug, surgery, or endoscopic management occurred in 2.5% (6/237) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium trihydrate of UDCA and CDCA is a well-tolerated bile acid that showed similar efficacy for gallstone dissolution and improvement of gallstone-related symptoms as that shown in previous studies.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antacids/administration & dosage , Chenodeoxycholic Acid/administration & dosage , Cholagogues and Choleretics/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Combinations , Gallstones/drug therapy , Magnesium Hydroxide/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Solubility/drug effects , Ursodeoxycholic Acid/administration & dosage
3.
J. pediatr. (Rio J.) ; 87(1): 24-28, jan.-fev. 2011. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-576125

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Comparar a efetividade de dois medicamentos: hidróxido de magnésio e polietilenoglicol 4000 sem eletrólitos no tratamento da constipação intestinal crônica funcional em crianças. MÉTODOS: Trinta e oito crianças foram divididas, por processo randômico, em dois grupos para uso de polietilenoglicol 4000 sem eletrólitos ou de hidróxido de magnésio. As crianças foram acompanhadas em consultas periódicas até completarem 6 meses de tratamento. Em todas as consultas, foram investigados: consistência das fezes, frequência evacuatória, presença de escape fecal, dor abdominal, esforço evacuatório e aceitação desses fármacos. RESULTADOS: Dezessete crianças fizeram uso de polietilenoglicol, e 21 utilizaram o hidróxido de magnésio. Houve melhora clínica de todas as variáveis nos dois grupos, sem diferenças com significância estatística. Todas as crianças aceitaram o polietilenoglicol, enquanto 42,9 por cento recusaram o hidróxido de magnésio. CONCLUSÃO: Não houve diferença de efetividade no tratamento da constipação intestinal entre esses dois laxantes. Entretanto, a melhor aceitação do polietilenoglicol, por ser inodoro e insípido, torna-o melhor opção no tratamento da constipação intestinal crônica funcional.


OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of two drugs, polyethylene glycol 4000 without electrolytes and magnesium hydroxide, in the treatment of chronic functional constipation in children. METHODS: Thirty-eight children were randomly assigned to either of two groups, polyethylene glycol 4000 without electrolytes or magnesium hydroxide. The children were followed through periodic appointments until they reached 6 months of treatment. In each medical appointment the following aspects were evaluated: stool consistency, frequency of bowel movements, fecal incontinence, abdominal pain, straining and acceptance of the drugs. RESULTS: Seventeen children made use of polyethylene glycol and twenty-one received magnesium hydroxide. All variables analyzed improved for both groups, with no statistically significant differences. All children accepted polyethylene glycol, while 42.9 percent refused magnesium hydroxide. CONCLUSION: The two laxatives showed no difference in effectiveness for the treatment of constipation. However, due to its better acceptance, because it is odorless and tasteless, polyethylene glycol proved to be a better option for treating chronic functional constipation.


Subject(s)
Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Constipation/drug therapy , Laxatives/therapeutic use , Magnesium Hydroxide/therapeutic use , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Constipation/complications , Laxatives/administration & dosage , Magnesium Hydroxide/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
5.
Acta gastroenterol. latinoam ; 25(3): 145-52, 1995. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-159744

ABSTRACT

Se estudiaron en grupos de ratas Wistar, en stress por inmovilización más inmersión en agua a 18C, las groseras lesiones agudas gástricas sangrantes y su prevención con drogas citoprotectoras gástricas como: sucralfato, HOAI y Mg, magaldrato, hidrotalcita y misoprostol; asimismo, drogas antisecretoras gástricas como misoprostol (dosis antisecretora), somatostatina (octeotride), ranitidina, omeprazol y lanzoprazol. En otra experiencia, se estudió la secreción gástrica ácida en ratas con ligadura de píloro, donde fueron tratadas con las mismas drogas y dosis que en la experiencia anterior. Se comprobó que el modelo de stress 6 hs. dió una zona lesional gástrica de un 80 por ciento; el sucralfato, como droga citoprotectora, dio una protección parcial de la mucosa gástrica; en cambio, los bloqueantes de la bomba de protones, omeprazol y lanzoprazol dieron una zona gástrica cercana al 0 por ciento y por ende, postulamos su uso en terapia intensiva en la profilaxis de las lesiones agudas gástricas sangrantes en el stress.


Subject(s)
Animals , Rats , Female , Gastritis/prevention & control , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Stomach Ulcer/prevention & control , Gastric Acid , Aluminum Hydroxide/administration & dosage , Aluminum Hydroxide/therapeutic use , Magnesium Hydroxide/administration & dosage , Magnesium Hydroxide/therapeutic use , Misoprostol/administration & dosage , Misoprostol/therapeutic use , Omeprazole/administration & dosage , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Ranitidine/administration & dosage , Ranitidine/therapeutic use , Somatostatin/administration & dosage , Somatostatin/therapeutic use , Stress, Physiological , Sucralfate/administration & dosage , Sucralfate/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL