Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis in a cocaine user: diagnostic and therapeutic knowledge

Abstract Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL) is a chronic infection that can affect the skin and mucous membranes. We report a case of oral, nasopharyngeal, and penile lesions in a 35-year-old cocaine user. The patient presented with ulcerated lesions in 2014. Histopathologic analysis revealed amastigotes, and serological test results were positive for leishmaniasis. Systemic therapy with meglumine antimoniate was administered; however, the patient failed to present for follow-up. In 2018, he returned with nasal collapse, and another histopathologic test confirmed MCL. This case illustrates the importance of careful differential diagnosis of skin and mucous ulcers to identify the particular pathology.

Antimoniato de meglumine perilesional en leishmaniasis cutánea con falla terapéutica sistémica: serie de casos / Perilesional meglumine antimonate in cutaneous leishmaniasis with systemic therapeutic failure: series of cases

En Bolivia, los medicamentos utilizados para el tratamiento de la leishmaniasis cutánea son los antimoniales, de aplicación sistémica en dosis/kg peso, los cuales provocan efectos adversos por la aplicación en largos periodos y grandes volúmenes. La aplicación perilesional de antimonio tiene similar eficacia terapéutica que la sistémica. Sin embargo, no se cuenta con información documentada respecto a la eficacia del tratamiento perilesional en pacientes con falla terapéutica, posterior al tratamiento sistémico. El objetivo de esta serie de casos fue evaluar el tratamiento perilesional con glucantime, en pacientes con leishmaniasis cutánea y falla terapéutica, posterior a un primer ciclo de tratamiento sistémico con antimoniales. El estudio se realizó con once pacientes con leishmaniasis cutánea con falla terapéutica, posterior a la administración de un primer ciclo de tratamiento sistémico con glucantime procedentes de la zona tropical de Bolivia. Se consideró como falla terapéutica la persistencia de la lesión y presencia de parásitos obtenidos de los bordes de la lesión. La intervención perilesional consistió en la aplicación día por medio de glucantime en cinco sesiones. La inoculación se realizó sobre el borde de la lesión y la dosificación del medicamento se calculó multiplicando el área de la lesión por el factor 0.008. Todos los pacientes presentaron dolor local durante el momento de inoculación del medicamento, así como también presentaron un ligero agrandamiento del área de la lesión después de la primera aplicación del medicamento En las siguientes inoculaciones se observó la reducción progresiva del área de la lesión hasta su completa cicatrización.

In Bolivia, the drugs used for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis are the antimonials by systemic application in doses/kg/weight, which cause adverse effects due to the applications in long periods and large volumes. The perilesional application of antimony has similar therapeutic efficacy than the systemic one. However, there is no documented information regarding the efficacy of perilesional treatment in patients with therapeutic failure after systemic treatment. The aim of this series of cases was to evaluate the perilesional treatment with Glucantime, in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis and therapeutic failure, after a first cycle of systemic treatment with antimonials. The study was conducted with eleven patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis and therapeutic failure, after the administration of a first cycle of systemic treatment with Glucantime. From the tropical zone of Bolivia. The persistence of the lesion and the presence of parasites at the edge of the lesion were considered as therapeutic failure. The perilesional intervention consisted in the application past one day of glucantime in five sessions. The inoculation was performed on the edge of the lesion and the dosage of the medication was calculated by multiplying the area of the lesion by the factor 0.008. All the cases presented local pain during the time of inoculation of the drug, as well as a slight enlargement of the area of the lesion after the first inoculation of the drug. In the following inoculations the progressive reduction of the area of the lesion was observed until its complete healing.

A randomized, open-label clinical trial comparing the long-term effects of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for mucosal leishmaniasis

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) is difficult due to the toxicity and route of administration of standard drugs. Miltefosine is an oral agent used for leishmaniasis treatment; however, no data exist regarding its use for ML in Brazil. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of miltefosine for ML treatment compared to that of pentavalent antimonial in a pilot study. METHODS: We performed a randomized clinical trial with two parallel groups. The tested intervention consisted of miltefosine 1.3-2 mg/kg/day (two capsules) for 28 days or intravenous 20 mg SbV/kg/day of meglumine antimoniate (N-MA) for 30 days. The final endpoint was defined as complete healing of the lesion four years after treatment. We also analyzed an early endpoint at 90 days after treatment. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in this study: each experimental group comprised 20 patients. Applying a multivariate model in an intention-to-treat analysis, we observed that patients treated with miltefosine had a cure probability 2.08 times greater (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-4.18) than those treated with N-MA at 90 days after treatment. At the final endpoint, we observed no differences in cure probability between miltefosine and N-MA (relative risk = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.33-1.32). With respect to adverse reactions, significant differences between groups were related to gastrointestinal effects, which were more frequent in the miltefosine group. CONCLUSIONS: Miltefosine may be an interesting alternative for treating ML because of its oral administration and cure rate after long-term follow-up.

Successful treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with intralesional meglumine antimoniate: A case series

Abstract Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a high-morbidity, vector-borne disease endemic to Colombia. Unlike conventional systemic antileishmanial therapy, intralesional meglumine antimoniate administration has fewer adverse effects and can be as effective and safe. We describe 12 patients treated with intralesional meglumine antimoniate: seven with primary and five with recurrent lesions. The majority (11/12) met all cure criteria after 1-7 sessions of meglumine antimoniate administration (1-5 mL). Adverse effects comprised mainly of local pain and edema. Intralesional meglumine antimoniate administration could be an excellent alternative treatment for uncomplicated CL; however, controlled clinical trials are needed to test the efficacy and safety thereof.