ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of nodal staging surgery before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). METHODS: A modified Markov model was constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of para-aortic staging surgery before definite CRT when no uptake is recorded in the para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) on PET/CT. Survival and complication rates were estimated based on the published literature. Cost data were obtained from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Strategies were compared using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity analyses were performed, including estimates for the performance of PET/CT, postoperative complication rate, and varying survival rates according to the radiation field. RESULTS: We compared two strategies: strategy 1, pelvic CRT for all patients; and strategy 2, nodal staging surgery followed by extended-field CRT when PALN metastasis was found and pelvic CRT otherwise. The ICER for strategy 2 compared to strategy 1 was $19,505 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Under deterministic sensitivity analyses, the model was relatively sensitive to survival reduction in patients who undergo pelvic CRT alone despite having occult PALN metastasis. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the case results, with a 91% probability of cost-effectiveness at the willingness-to-pay thresholds of $60,000/QALY. CONCLUSION: Nodal staging surgery before definite CRT may be cost-effective when PET/CT imaging shows no evidence of PALN metastasis. Prospective trials are warranted to transfer these results to guidelines.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Chemoradiotherapy/economics , Combined Modality Therapy/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Laparoscopy/economics , Lymph Node Excision/economics , Lymphatic Metastasis , Markov Chains , Multimodal Imaging/economics , Neoplasm Staging , Positron-Emission Tomography/economics , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/economicsABSTRACT
Objetivo Estimar la costo-efectividad de 18FDG-PET/CT comparado con CT seguido de 18FDG-PET/CT como prueba confirmatoria de un caso positivo en la evaluación al final del tratamiento en pacientes menores de 18 años con Linfoma Hodgkin (LH). Métodos Se construyó un árbol de decisión donde se comparó el uso de 18FDG-PET/CT con CT seguido de 18FDG-PET/CT como prueba confirmatoria de un caso positivo en la detección de lesión residual. El resultado se midió en Años de Vida Ganados (AVG). Se calculó la razón de costo-efectividad incremental. Se utilizó como umbral 3 veces el PIB per cápita por año AVG. Valores expresados en pesos colombianos de 2010 (1 US dólar = $ 1 897,89) Se realizaron análisis de sensibilidad univariados, bivariados y probabilísticos. Resultados Suponiendo un diferencial en AVG entre verdaderos positivos y falsos negativos de 13 meses, el costo de un AVG adicional con 18FDG-PET/CT comparado con CT seguido de 18FDG-PET/CT como prueba confirmatoria de un caso positivo en la evaluación al final del tratamiento en pacientes pediátricos con LH fue $ 34 508 590. Conclusión Si el diferencial de esperanza de vida entre verdaderos positivos y falsos negativos es de al menos un 1,03 años, el uso de 18FDG-PET/CT en la evaluación al final del tratamiento de pacientes pediátricos con LH, es una estrategia costo-efectiva para Colombia.
Objective Estimating the cost-effectiveness of 18FDG-PET/CT (positron emission tomography) compared to computer tomography (CT) followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case at the end of treatment in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients under 18 years-old. Methods A decision tree was built for comparing 18FDG-PET/CT to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case in detecting residual lesions; outcome was measured in life years gained (LYG). The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated; the threshold was 3 times the per capita GDP per LYG. Values were expressed in Colombian pesos for 2010 (1 US dollar=$ 1,897.89) and submitted to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results Assuming a difference of 13 months in true positives' life expectancy compared to that for false negatives, the cost of an additional LYG with 18FDG-PET/CT compared to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case when evaluating the end of pediatric HL patients' treatment was $ 34,508,590 (COP). Conclusion If differential life-expectancy between true positives and false negatives is at least 1.03 years, then using 18FDG-PET/CT for evaluating the end of HL pediatric patients' therapy is a cost-effective strategy for Colombia.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Multimodal Imaging/economics , Positron-Emission Tomography/economics , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Colombia , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Fluorine Radioisotopes/economics , /economics , Hodgkin Disease/pathology , Hodgkin Disease , Hodgkin Disease , Life Expectancy , Neoplasm, Residual/diagnosis , Neoplasm, Residual/economics , Prognosis , Radiopharmaceuticals/economicsABSTRACT
A tomografia de emissão de pósitrons (PET) é de uso recente no Brasil e há necessidade de se estimar os custos do procedimento, de forma a subsidiar estudos de avaliação econômica sobre a tecnologia. O trabalho analisou o processo de produção da PET-TC utilizando 18 F-FDG e estimou seus custos na perspectiva de um provedor público de serviços de saúde. Utilizou- se a técnica de microcustos, com identificação, quantificação e valoração de todos os insumos consumidos na produção do procedimento. As estimativas de custo consideraram a observação de 85 exames realizados no Instituto Nacional de Câncer, de março/julho de 2012. O caso de referência considerou pacientes oncológicos adultos, volume de produção de 5 exames/dia e uso de uma dose de 18 F-FDG por paciente. Os custos unitários do procedimento foram de R$ 3.150,30, na perspectiva salarial da carreira de Ciência & Tecnologia, e de R$ 2.927,19 na do Ministério da Saúde. O elemento de maior impacto nos custos correspondeu ao volume diário de produção dos exames. Foram explorados elementos que podem impactar no custo do exame nas instituições públicas de saúde.
Positron emission tomography (PET) has been introduced recently in Brazil and requires costs analysis to support economic evaluation studies on its use. The current study analyzed the use of 18 F-FDG PET-CT and estimated its costs from the perspective of a public healthcare provider. The micro-costing technique was used, identifying, quantifying, and valuing all the inputs used to perform the procedure. Cost estimates considered 85 tests performed at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute from March to June 2012. Reference cases were defined as adult cancer patients, output of five tests per day, and one dose of 18 F-FDG per patient. Unit cost for the procedure was BRL 3,150.30 based on career wages under the Ministry of Science and Technology and BRL 2,927.19 based on Ministry of Health career wages. The factor with the heaviest cost impact was daily output of tests. Other factors that could impact the test’s cost in public healthcare institutions were also examined.
La tomografía por emisión de positrones (PET) es de uso reciente en Brasil y es necesario estimar sus costes, con el fin de subsidiar estudios de evaluación económica sobre esta tecnología. El trabajo examina el proceso de producción de PET-TC con 18F-FDG y se estimaron sus costes desde la perspectiva de un prestador público de servicios de salud. Se empleó la técnica de microcostes, con la identificación, cuantificación y valoración de los insumos consumidos en la producción del procedimiento. Las estimaciones consideran la observación de 85 exámenes entre marzo y julio de 2012. El “caso base” considera pacientes adultos de cáncer, con una producción de 5 exámenes/día y el uso de una dosis de 18F-FDG por paciente. Los costes unitarios del procedimiento fueron, respectivamente, R$ 3.150.30 y R$ 2.927.19, desde la perspectiva del Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología y del Ministerio de Salud. El volumen diario de producción fue el elemento de mayor impacto en los costes. Además, se analizaron los factores que pueden repercutir en el coste del examen en instituciones de salud pública.