ABSTRACT
As vias aéreas, constituídas por epitélio ciliado e secretor de muco, promovem ao trato respiratório mecanismo de defesa que livra esta superfície das partículas inaladas durante a respiração. É de fundamental importância o entendimento da fisiologia e dos mecanismos envolvidos com a atividade mucociliar. A literatura sugere que o NO, em especial o produzido pela expressão da iNOS, mantém a função mucociliar e a defesa imune da cavidade nasal. Objetivo: Avaliar o envolvimento do NO e das vias enzimáticas da produção do NO no transporte mucociliar, utilizando inibidores da NO sintase constitutiva e indutiva, L-NAME e aminoguanidina, respectivamente. Materiais e métodos: Preparações de palatos de rã foram imersos em soluções de ringer (controle), L-NAME ou aminoguanidina. Os palatos foram imersos nestas soluções por quatro períodos de 15 minutos. Medidas da velocidade do transporte mucociliar foram feitas antes e após cada exposição. Resultos: Palatos controles mantiveram estável a velocidade do transporte. O L-NAME aumentou, enquanto a aminoguanidina reduziu a velocidade de transporte do muco. Conclusão: O bloqueio inespecífico da cNOS com L-NAME e bloqueio relativamente específico da iNOS com aminoguanidina permitiu propor que dependendo da via o NO pode aumentar ou diminuir o transporte mucociliar em palatos de rã.
The airways are made up of ciliated epithelium which secretes mucous, protecting the respiratory tract from particles inhaled during breathing. Its is paramount to understand the physiology and the mechanisms involved in mucociliary activity. Literature suggests that Nitric oxide (NO), especially the one produced by iNOS expression, maintains the mucociliary function and the immune defense of the nasal cavity. AIM: to assess NO participation and the enzymatic pathways in the production of NO and mucociliary transport, using constructive and inductive NO synthetase inhibitors, L-NAME and aminoguanidine, respectively. Materials and methods: frog palates were prepared and immerse in ringer (control), L-NAME or aminoguanidine solutions. The palates were immerse in these solutions for four periods of 15 minutes. Mucociliary transport measures were carried out before and after each exposure. Results: control palates maintained stable their transportation speed. L-NAME increased, while aminoguanidine reduced mucous transportation velocity. Conclusion: unspecific cNOS block with L-NAME and relatively specific iNOS block with aminoguanidine results leads us to propose that depending on the pathway, the NO can increase or reduce mucociliary transport in frog palates.
Subject(s)
Animals , Mucociliary Clearance/drug effects , Nasal Mucosa/enzymology , Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II/antagonists & inhibitors , Nitric Oxide Synthase Type III/antagonists & inhibitors , Nitric Oxide/physiology , Anura , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Guanidines/pharmacology , Mucociliary Clearance/physiology , NG-Nitroarginine Methyl Ester/pharmacology , Nitric Oxide/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
The nature of the sub epithelial zone was established. S.E. shows IgG and IgM activity in tuberculoid group. Lepromatous group did not show any IgM or IgG response. IgE activity was seen in the lepromatous region in exudate and on the surfaces of Macrophages. Lysozyme activity was seen in the mucous acini of lepromatous leprosy.