ABSTRACT
Abstract Giant Osteosclerotic Lesions (GOLs) are a group of rarely reported intraosseous lesions. Their precise diagnosis is important since they can be confused with malignant neoplasms. Objective This retrospective study aimed to record and analyze the clinical and radiographic Giant Osteosclerotic Lesions (GOLs) detected in the maxillomandibular area of patients attending to our institution. Materials and Methods: Informed consent from the patients was obtained and those cases of 2.5 cm or larger lesions with radiopaque or mixed (radiolucid-radiopaque) appearance located in the maxillofacial bones were selected. Assessed parameters were: age, gender, radiographic aspect, shape, borders, size, location and relations to roots. Lesions were classified as radicular, apical, interradicular, interradicular-apical, radicular-apical or located in a previous teeth extraction area. Additionally, several osseous and dental developmental alterations (DDAs) were assessed. Results Seventeen radiopacities in 14 patients were found and were located almost exclusively in mandible and were two types: idiopathic osteosclerosis and condensing osteitis. GOLs were more frequent in females, and in the anterior and premolar zones. 94.2% of GOLs were qualified as idiopathic osteosclerosis and one case was condensing osteitis. All studied cases showed different osseous and dental developmental alterations (DDAs). The most common were: Microdontia, hypodontia, pulp stones, macrodontia and variations in the mental foramina. Conclusions GOLs must be differentiated from other radiopaque benign and malignant tumors. Condensing osteitis, was considered an anomalous osseous response induced by a chronic low-grade inflammatory stimulus. For development of idiopathic osteosclerosis, two possible mechanisms could be related. The first is modification of the normal turnover with excessive osseous deposition. The second mechanism will prevent the normal bone resorption, arresting the osseous breakdown process.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Osteosclerosis/diagnostic imaging , Mandibular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Maxillary Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Osteitis/pathology , Osteitis/diagnostic imaging , Osteosclerosis/pathology , Radiography, Panoramic , Mandibular Diseases/pathology , Maxillary Diseases/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , Middle AgedABSTRACT
En la actualidad, la principal causa por la que acuden los pacientes al odontólogo es el dolor dental, endonde la mayoría presenta un padecimiento pulpar o periapical irreversibles, que pueden estar asociados a factores traumáticos e irritativos. Sin embargo, pocosde ellos son asintomáticos, como la osteítis condensante que es escasamente mencionada en elámbito de la Endodoncia; por lo tanto, el objetivo de este caso clínico es el de proporcionar información acerca de la osteítis condensante siguiendo los lineamientos internacionales de Case Report (CARE). La osteítis condensante tiene una incidencia muy baja en pacientes y se debe diagnosticar correctamente al momento de tratar este tipo de lesiones con las diferentes herramientas de diagnóstico que se conocen. En este caso, se presenta un paciente del sexo femenino de 58 años de edad con un estado prediabético, que refiere un fractura del segundo molar inferior derecho, al cual radiográficamente se le encontróuna lesión periapical radiopaca en la raíz distal. Se muestra la secuencia del tratamiento, el manejo clínico y la rehabilitación.
At present, the main reason for patients to visit adentist is dental pain, where most of them presenta pulp or periapical irreversible condition, whichmay be associated with traumatic and irritative factors. However, few of them are asymptomatic as osteitiscondensing that is barely mentioned in thefield of endodontics. The aim of this case report isto provide information about the condensing osteitisfollowing international Case Report (CARE)guidelines. Condensing osteitis has a very low incidence in patients and should be correctly diagnosed with the different available diagnostic tools. In thiscase a 58-years-old female patient, with prediabeticstate, referred of a right lower second molar fracturewhich radiographically showed a radiopaque periapicallesion in the distal root of the molar. The sequence of treatment, clinical management and rehabilitation is presented.